1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Perfection
That than which nothing greater can be conceived (Aquinas)
Omnipotence (Aquinas)
Ability to do anything logically possible
Omnipotence (Descartes)
Ability to do anything, unbound by logic and morality
Omnipotence (Process T)
God isn’t omnipotent, but rather ‘unsurpassably great’
Omnipotence in scripture
“God said ‘Let there be light’ and there was light” - Genesis 1:3
‘“Jesus looked at them and said
Explain the Paradox of the Stone
P1: If God can create a stone that He can’t lift then He can’t lift it
P2: If God can lift the stone then He can’t have created it
P3: Either way there’s something that God can’t do
P4: It is impossible to both create and lift the stone
P5: Therefore the concept of omnipotence is incoherent
C1: Therefore God is not omnipotent
Solution to Paradox of the Stone (Savage)
God has infinite lifting power and infinite creating power; God can both lift and create infinite stones; God can create a stone and then lift it without limitation
Paradox between omnipotence and supreme goodness
P1: To commit evil is to fail to be supremely good
P2: If God is supremely good, then God cannot committ evil
P3: Therefore, if God is supremely good, there is something that God cannot do
C1: Therefore, God cannot be both supremely good and omnipotent
Solution to paradox between omnipotence and supreme goodness
*Aquinas: There is no distinct power of ‘committing evil’; it is merely a privation/absence of good; failure is not a power/perfection so not having that doesn’t invalidate omnipotence
Vardy: God can commit evil (omnipotence) but chooses not to (supreme goodness)
Problem if morality is good because God wills it.
Tautology; if God’s will = good, then God’s will = God’s will
Problem if God wills what He wills because it is good
God would be bound to a standard of goodness greater than Him
Possible solutions/interpretations of ‘God wills what is good’
Kant/Avarroes - God’s perfect understanding of good → always wills what is good
Ockham - goodness is determined by what God wills
Aquinas - goodness is in God’s nature and cannot be separated from what He wills
Supreme goodness/omnibenevolence in scripture
“And Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.’” - Luke 18:19
“Give thanks to the Lord, for He is good and his love endures forever” - Psalms 118:1
God’s Agapé love
Originates from God - ‘God is love… He sent His one and only son into the world so that we might live through him’ - John 4:7-9
Unconditional
Sacrificial
Selfless
Motivational > emotional; primary example = crucifixion
Omniscience
Knowledge of all truths
Omniscience in scripture
“Great is our Lord and mighty in power; his understanding has no limit” - Psalm 147:5
“If our hearts condemn us, we know that God is greater than our hearts, and He knows everything” - 1 John 3:20
Problems with divine attribute of omniscience
Free will; if God is omniscient+eternal, and therefore God knows I do x, then I must do x, therefore I have no free will
Schleiermacher’s solution to omniscience vs free will
God knows what He will do because He knows us; God makes perfectly accurate predictions about our actions
Why believe that God is eternal/timeless?
Maintains God’s perfection and immutability
God’s plan cannot be thwarted or avoided
God knows everything a priori
Boethius’ solution to omniscience and free will
‘… to embrace simultaneously the whole of an unending life in one present’
Anselm’s four-dimensional solution to omniscience and free will
God is in all of time because all of time is in God
God perceives all time simultaneously
God learns what I do when I do it, but God’s K is never changeable;
God learns everything at once
I am still free because from my temporal perspective the future does not exist;
I don’t know what God knows
The only way I get from T1 -> T2 is by making choices
Similarities and differences between Boethius and Anselm
Compatibilism
Actions are free if they are internally motivated
Everlasting
Exists throughout all of time but not outside of time
Eternal
Existing outside of time, timeless
Swinburne’s solution to omniscience and free will
God exists for all of time but is not outside of time; everlasting