I/O Psych, chap 8 Training/ Onboarding

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

I/O Psych, chapter 8 Training/ Onboarding

77 Terms

1
New cards

Training Needs assessment

Process of Organizations identifying what needs to be trained, who needs training, and cons of the organization support (such as money). Considered best practice for starting a training program within an organization

2
New cards
<p>Training process (4 steps)</p>

Training process (4 steps)

knowt flashcard image
3
New cards

Organizational analyis

Identification of a set of organizational issues that can either help or hurt the effectiveness of a program.

4
New cards
<p>How to do an Organizational Analysis (First 3 steps)</p>

How to do an Organizational Analysis (First 3 steps)

1.) Find out why the organization wants to do a training program. List general goals. Explain how this training will address those goals and why the organization is interested in this specific training. It needs to align with the organization's strategies and objectives.

2.) Identify the workers who need this training.

Ex: Development team or managers

3.) Identify resources needed/availible for training

-Training budget

-Identify trainers (Outside consultants, internal trainers, expert employees).

-Place/ Facility and equipment needed to conduct training (conference room, virtual)

5
New cards
<p>How to do an Organizational Analysis (Last 2 steps)</p>

How to do an Organizational Analysis (Last 2 steps)

4.) Workplace culture. There needs to be support for content being trained by supervisors. Cannot train something no one cares about.

5.) Competitors and legal. Do Competitors have this training too, making them better? Think about MANDT. What laws are put into places as to how it should be trained. Ex: Wheel chair training for relias.

6
New cards

Training Needs Assessment process

1.) Organizational Analysis. What resources o we have for training? Like Money, internal trainers, facilitated. And does the workplace culture support / want to do this training.

2.) Job Analysis: KSA’s needed to perform job. List critical incidents employees can face at work.

3.) Person Analysis: Employees skill set, KSAs employees need to be trained on. List training goals.

4.) Demographic analysis: Background and experience of those being trained. Are they motivated to learn?

7
New cards

Job Analysis

Identifying which tasks employees currently perform on their job and KSA needed to do those tasks.

8
New cards
<p>Person Analysis</p>

Person Analysis

Identifying what the currently employee can actually do and what KSA’s they currently possess.

Ways to see what they know:

  • Employee performance ratings

  • Customer ratings

  • Test

  • Interview their supervisors.


9
New cards

Google'‘s “Project Oxygen” Name Goal and Data taken

Goal: Train managers how to be a better boss

Data taken: Performance reviews, nominations for manager awards, feedback surveys, interview with bosses.

10
New cards
<p>Google'‘s “Project Oxygen” 8 behaviors for managers</p>

Google'‘s “Project Oxygen” 8 behaviors for managers

  1. Be a good coach

  2. Empower the team to avoid micromanaging

  3. Express interest in employees' well-being

  4. Be productive and results-oriented

  5. Be a good communicator and listen to team members

  6. Help employees with career development

  7. Illustrate a clear goal from the start for the team

  8. Having the technical skills to guide the team


11
New cards

Training goals

A specific statement that tells us the purpose of training/ what employees are expected to learn by the end of training.

12
New cards

How to get training goals

  1. What the job analysis says that an employee should know / be able to do

  2. What the person analysis says the specific employee already knows / is able to do.


13
New cards
<p>Demographic analyis</p>

Demographic analyis

Identifying the people that need to be trained. Know their education, age, how tech savvy they are, are they motivated to learn, and what their personality like?

Ex: Typical Comop employee: Gen X, immigrant from Africa, not tech savvy, and a willingness to learn practical skills.

14
New cards
<p>Transfer of training</p>

Transfer of training

The degree that training leads to improvement at work. How applicable it is IRL.

15
New cards

individual and organizational characteristics on training motivation and training outcomes.

knowt flashcard image
16
New cards
<p>Learning self efficacy</p>

Learning self efficacy

A person’s internal belief that they can actually do well and master the training material.

  • Can be tested via Core Self evaluation (CSE)


17
New cards

Reasons (2) that individual differences matter in training

1.) Everyone learns differently so we need to find an approach that works for them. Ex: Visual, auditory, or kinetic

2.) A wide variety of individual differences in a group can be difficult for a training. Such as if a group has 60% beginners while the other 40% is advance.

18
New cards

5 Individual differences determinants that effect learning

  1. Cognitive ability (“g:)

  2. Big 5 personality (specifically Conscientiousness, openness, and extroversion).

  3. Learning Self efficacy.

  4. Learning style

  5. Meta-cognitive Skill


19
New cards

Goal orientation

Goals a person has when learning. An individual difference

2 types:

  • Learning goal orientation

  • Performance goal orientation


20
New cards
<p>Learning goal orientation</p>

Learning goal orientation

Focusing on mastering the training material for ones self

21
New cards
<p>Performance goal orientation</p>

Performance goal orientation

Internal urge to do well on outcomes, to prove one’s competence to others and avoid criticism of their performance.

22
New cards
<p>Meta-cognitive skills</p>

Meta-cognitive skills

The ability of learners to take a step back and assess their own learning and mastery of the material.

  • Low meta-cognitive causes people to overestimate their abilities.They might even discount negative results or feedback.

  • Short assessments can help them improve.


23
New cards
<p>Identical Elements</p>

Identical Elements

The degree to which the context of the training is transferable / similar to IRL

24
New cards

Psychological Fidelity and the 3 types

When training elicits the KSA’s needed for job.

  • Physical fidelity

  • Transfer through principles

  • Transfer Climate


25
New cards
<p>Physical fidelity</p>

Physical fidelity

(A psychology fidelity) When training resembles physical aspects of the job.

Ex: Using a simulation for deep oil drilling job instead of classroom lecture.

26
New cards
<p>Transfer through principles</p>

Transfer through principles

(A psychology fidelity) Training employees to understand why they should perform their job a certain way and the principles behind the actions for the job. Allowing them to think critically and handle unique situations better

27
New cards
<p>Transfer climate</p>

Transfer climate

(A psychology fidelity) When workplace culture (between employees) reinforce things taught in training in IRL.

Ex: In training, nurses are taught to give meds with milk or apple sauce. But IRL, the hospital only has water. SO nurses give them the pills with only water

28
New cards

Trainee Motivation

How motivated a learner is to gain the KSA’s provided to succeed in training

29
New cards

Ways organization can enhance learning transfer (5)

  1. Physical fidelity

  2. Transfer through principles

  3. Transfer climate

  4. Treat errors in training as a natural part of learning

  5. Cognitive ability and conscientiousness


30
New cards

Massed Learning

Training delivered in 1 (or more) condensed sessions.

*Provides faster deliver of new knowledge or skill

31
New cards

Meaningfulness

The degree of relevance of training to workplace/learner

  • High in hazardous workplace like construction for safety training.


32
New cards
<p>Spaced learning</p>

Spaced learning

Training delivered in small sessions over a long period of time.

  • This is better than mass because it allows learners to organize and integrate what they learned.


33
New cards

Feedback

Trainer gives learners information about how well they are doing and how close their knowledge is to their results.

  • Great for those with low Meta cognition.


34
New cards
<p>Learning Schema</p>

Learning Schema

A framework for organizing learning content. Allows learner to see the big picture.

Ex: In class, we get syllabus

  • A better schematics (fitting/organizing material in head), the closer to an expert one becomes.


35
New cards

Overlearning

A training approach where the trainee practices a behavior so much that it becomes automatic. Learning in stressful conditions ensures correct performance during emergency situations. This requires a lot of training time.

Ex: Nuclear power plant worker

36
New cards
<p>Machine Simulator</p>

Machine Simulator

An environment that reflects the job situation as closely as possible both psychologically and physically. Safer and allows learners to experience critical infrequent occurring situations.

Ex: Pilots training in a Machine cockpit simulation

37
New cards

Debriefing

After training, trainees discuss the program to tell us (or others) what happened, what could’ve been done better and what they learned.

38
New cards

Lecture (Training method)

Oral presentation of information. Can be done with or without feedback and discussion. This is best for large groups.

  • most frequently used training method.


39
New cards
<p>Programmed instructions (Training method)</p>

Programmed instructions (Training method)

Presenting training materials in modules. At the end of a module, must pass quiz to move on to the next. Ex: Relias.

Two types:

  • Linear Programmed instruction

  • Branching programmed instruction


40
New cards
<p>Improvement of technology in sophisticated Analytics (Pros and Cons)</p>

Improvement of technology in sophisticated Analytics (Pros and Cons)

Pros:

  • Organizations training can be assessed quickly via collection of metrics (such as sales and productivity).

  • Training evaluation can happen quickly, giving learner immediate feedback.

  • Follow-up surveys are given to learners to ask about their learning experience or recommend specific training based on past behavior.


Cons:

  • Learner control, they get choices about training features. Doing activities that are potentially unhelpful instead of actually learning.

Ex1: How much feedback they want.

Ex2: How much training content do they want to do.


41
New cards

Behavior modeling training

There is a model that gets observed. Then learner role-play in a similar situation. Then gets feedback from trainer and other learners. Usually used in a supervisor training. Showing positive and negative models help with job transfer.

Ex: MANDT physical training.

42
New cards

Diversity training

Training geared toward working with a diverse group of employees. A long with sensitivity to different groups.

Results of this training:

  1. Increase in trainee motivation/attitude

  2. Increase skills/behaviors

  3. Increased cognition/knowledge.



43
New cards

Developmental association centers (MGMT development Training method)

Centers that give feedback and development plan for managers

44
New cards

Executive coaching (MGMT development Training method)

1 on 1 coaching for manager and coach on their own or at the company’s expense. Typically discussing challenges at work.

  • When managers coached employees, this Leaders to an increase of sale goals/productivity.

Ex: Mentor Matt

45
New cards

Case Study Analysis (MGMT development Training method)

In-depth analysis of a business case.

46
New cards

Business Games / Simulation (MGMT development Training method)

Friendly competition between business teams to improve business decisions.

EX:Jssapordy

47
New cards

Role-playing (MGMT development Training method)

Individuals act out challenging work situations to enhance their ability in future situations

48
New cards
<p>Cross cultural training (MGMT development Training method)</p>

Cross cultural training (MGMT development Training method)

Training to develop their skills working with overseas assignments.

Includes:

  • Culture awareness insensitivity

  • Language training


49
New cards
<p>Onboarding</p>

Onboarding

New employees go through a process to become more familiar with tasks and social demands of their new role

50
New cards

New Employee Orientation (NEO)

Training process that gives new employees basic information to help them prepare to contribute to the organization ASAP

51
New cards

Reaction ( criteria for Training effectiveness)

How employees perceive the training. Do they like it? Is it appropriate IRL

52
New cards

Learning ( criteria for Training effectiveness)

Trainee displays indicators / signs of learning material during training session. Do they actually gain knowledge/skills?

  • This can be measured by test and assessments


53
New cards

Behavior ( criteria for Training effectiveness)

Determines if the training leads to changes in on-the-job behavior.

  • Measured by performance ratings or other job performance indicators.


54
New cards

Results ( criteria for Training effectiveness)

Determines if the training leads to a change in the organization’s performance such as profitability.

55
New cards

Threats to experimental validity

Any compounding factors that can affect our ability to interpret results of a study correctly such as a training evaluation.

56
New cards

Threats to internal validity (Defintion)

Any factors that causes us to be concerned with the accuracy of the results obtained from this experiment.

57
New cards
<p>First 6 threats to internal validity</p>

First 6 threats to internal validity

  1. History: An event that happens between pretest and post test. Ex: Pay rasies or lay offs.

  2. Maturation. Participants changes between pretest and post test. Ex1: Kids entering puberty. Ex2: Workers starting the position and gaining more skills before post test.

  3. Testing: Pretest affects post test. Understanding the pretest can give learners the upper hand with understanding the key learning goals. Ex: PSAT and SAT

  4. Instrumentation: Change in test measures between test. Ex1: Change in evaluator/ supervisor grading the test more lenient or more severe. Ex2: Evaluated uses different non-equivalent test.

  5. Statistical regressions to the mean: An individual might score much lowered or much higher on post test. Could be because of a random factor like a good or bad day. It’s a mess because it affects who we should give remedial training or determine high potentials are.

  6. Differential Selections of participants: Non-random assignment of training or control conditions. Causing any differences between groups could be caused by training or other factors. Ex: Group 1 is San Francisco and group 2 is Seattle. Since it is not random, any difference can be because of other factors.


58
New cards
<p>Last 5 threats to internal validity</p>

Last 5 threats to internal validity

7. Experimental mortality: When a bunch of participants drop out of a study. Ex1: Someone died. Ex2: Huge Layoffs / series of staff quit.

  1. Compensatory equalization of treatments: When someone outside the training group / program does something “Special” for those in the control group. Ex1: An executive manager decides to give “perks” to those in the control group who did not get the opportunity to take the training.

  2. Compensatory rivalry between respondents receiving less-desirable treatments: When individuals in the control group realize they are not getting the training/ in the experiment. Ex1: Training for elementary school teachers gets new technology, but the others across town didn’t get it and found out. Then the control group tries harder to prove a point.

  3. Resentful demoralization of respondents receiving less-desirable treatments: Those in the control group resent the fact they cannot receive the training and decide to perform worse as a result.

  4. Diffusion of treatment: During the training, the experimental group returns to work, then trains the control group on details about their training.

  • This could cause issues because the control group will then perform as well as the experimental group.


59
New cards

Threats to external validity (2)

Any factors that causes us to be concerned if the training evaluation can be generalized to other settings.

  1. Reactive effects of pre-testing: Learners preformed better because during the pre-test they paid great attention to the material related to it during the training sessions.

  2. Reactive effects of the experimental setting: When people in the experiment know they are part of a study and tries harder (like the Hawthorne effect)


60
New cards

Experimental Rigor

The degree to how close an experiment is to the true experimental design.

  • You increase this with elements such as control group, random association, and pre-test.


61
New cards

Training evaluation design options

  1. Experimental vs control

  2. Random assignment

  3. Pre-test compared to post test


62
New cards

How to help those with a low self-efficacy and external locus of control

Break up training into smaller steps.

63
New cards

Factors that help trainee motivation

  • More money

  • satisfaction for doing job well

  • to get a promotion

  • do one’s job better


64
New cards

Goal setting theory

People perform best when they are given a specific difficult goal.

  • You can do this with SMART goals


65
New cards

SMART Goals

Specific

Measurable

Attainable (Aggressive and achievable)

Relevant

Timely

66
New cards

Expectancy / VIE theory

High effort → Good Performance → Great/Desirable outcome

67
New cards

Reinforcement theory

Actions/ learning efforts → Desirable outcome

68
New cards

Social learning theory

Learning by observing others

69
New cards

On the job training (OJT)

Employee trains coworker (new hire) a job while still doing all their own tasks and responsibilities.

  • This can build resentment


70
New cards
<p>Program instruction (Pros and cons)</p>

Program instruction (Pros and cons)

Pros:

  • Learners can go at their own pace

  • Gives feedback to learners. Great for those with poor cognitive skills


Cons:

  • Costly to develop (especially branching approach) unless there already made module.

  • Some learners preference physical trainers over books/CPU


71
New cards

Best practices with program instructions

Program instructions used in conjunction with physical training. This frees up trainers time and address the learner’s needs.

72
New cards

Diversity training effect on learners:

  1. Training that involved social interaction had a greater effect.

  1. Other diverse initiatives are in place.

  2. Training focused on skill and awareness

  3. Conducted over a period of time (learners like this more).


73
New cards

Goals for new hire orientation

  1. Communicate information about the job and organization

  2. Acquire essential job and safety skills.

  3. Discuss norms and attitudes within the organizational culture

  4. Understanding of how things are done in the organization

  5. Outline of who does what in the organization.


74
New cards

NEO notes

  • Employees prefer coming in and being told how great the organization is.

  • New employees are nervous. Make them comfortable.

  • If paperwork can be done in advance, do it.

  • Valued people are motivated people.


75
New cards

Evaluating on boarding program (4 levels)

Level 1: Assess employees’ reaction to the program

Level 2: Knowledge they have at the end of the on boarding

Level 3: Their behaviors

Level 4: Business outcomes associated with the program.

76
New cards

Benefits of e-learning

  • Easy to use

  • distributed to employees around the world

  • Convenient


77
New cards

Reasons organization don’t evaluate training programs (3)

  1. Some organizations don’t see the need to formally evaluate. Especially if people are happy.

  2. Some trainers want to avoid evaluation of training

  3. Can be time consuming and challenging. Most trainers are not trained how to do a proper evaluation.