1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Interviews (structured)
Strict script of questions
Interviews (unstructured)
Conversational, follow-up q’s, more open
Aspects of interviews
Costly (interviewer training, salary, travel)
Often qualitative which can be subjective
Concerned with interviewer bias that affects participant responses and interpretation of participant answers
Phone surveys
Structured or unstructured
Easy to get random sample
Cheaper
Fewer social desirability concerns
Questionnaires
Paper or electronic
Cheapest
Surface level info., breadth v. depth (interviews)
Extremely common
Advantages of questionnaires
Easy to administer (quick to administer and score, lots of info., requires fewer resources)
Can assess non-observable variables (ex. self-esteem, attitudes, and beliefs)
Can assess variables that you cannot (ethically) manipulate (ex. sexual behaviour, gender, etc.)
Disadvantages of questionnaires
Accuracy is often low
People lack insight (ex. their own weaknesses, friends beliefs)
Forget previous behaviour (ex. frequency of sex)
Socially desirable responding (ex. lying)
If assessing the IV, cannot demonstrate causation
Questionnaires often used when assessing…
Demographics (ex. sex, age)
Attitudes and beliefs
Past behavior
Unobservable current behavior
Motivation and emotion
Personality traits
How to clearly define variable (survey construction)
Should reflect research q.
May include different operations of same variable (ex. conscientiousness: tidiness, paying bills, following rules)
How to develop valid survey q’s (survey construction)
Should be easy to understand
Avoid technical terms (conditioning, schizophrenia)
Avoid vague or imprecise terms (“health problems”)
Avoid long or run-on q’s
Avoid double barrelled q’s (a q that asks 2 things at once)
Avoid leading q’s (ex. “are you in favour of eliminating the wasteful expenses of the budget”)
Avoid negative wording (ex. “are you opposed to not allowing gays and lesbians to legally marry?)
How do participant answer your q’s (survey construction)
Open-ended and closed-ended
Open-ended questions
Allow participants to respond however they want
Advantages: Tends to improve much more info. (people might not actually provide it)
Drawbacks: Need time to decide how to score responses, takes time to analyse
Closed-ended questions
Advantages: Easy to score
Drawbacks: Might neglect important info., and gives a limited # of responses (ex. favourite color), won’t obtain tangential info. (ex. “do you think this park should be built?” — does not assess why they think that)
Rating scales
Respondents pick number on a scale (ex. satisfied/not satisfied, no pain/extreme pain)
Likert scale
Need to consider # of response options (5-7 is sufficient)
How to label the scales
Anchors
How to label a scale; labels are known as anchors (ex. how much TV do you watch study)
How to assemble a survey (survey construction)
Organised in a way that’s easy for participants to understand (is it viewable on diff. devices)
Order matters (q’s can bias responses to later q’s)
Place more uncomfortable/personal q’s near the end
Demographic items are rarely biased and thus go last