1/58
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Comparative Politics
study and comparison of
domestic policies, political institutions, power struggles
across different countries
general patters and tests theories
why political systems differ
Ex: why SK developed a stable democracy when NK didn’t
domestic internal choices produce different outcomes
Comparative method
analytical technique
compare 2+ countries (cases)
formulate hypothesis, isolate key variables, draw general conclusions
primary tool to test cause and effect in real world
cant conduct lab experiment
Ex: Tocqueville contrasts post revolution stability in France and US to determine that political decentralization is explanatory variable
Correlation V Causation
Correlation is association between two variables
Causation means a change in one variable changes the other
Don’t confuse correlation with causation
leads to flawed policy or theories
confounding variables can be present
Ex: Economic development correlates with democracy/stability but does not cause it unless social and political change present
The State
Centralized political organization that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force over a specific territory
Webber
foundation of political authority
provides security
institutions needed to have policy
Ex: Modern French state developed through gaining territorial control and bureaucratic expansion (over centuries)
Sovereignty
Legal authority and ability of a state to govern independent of external and internal rivals
execute policies
Modern: state has autonomy over domestic affairs
Ex: UK has legal sovereignty over territory though some power seceded to scotland, wales and formally EU
State Building
Deliberate support of effective institutions
For public order, prevent collapse
Fukuyama: balance of scope (function) and strength (capacity)
Ex: South Korea built strong capacity after war, leading to economic development and infrastructure
Neo- patrimonialism
Formal bureaucratic structures
Informal personal patronage
distribute state resources to loyal elites
Erodes state capacity b/c lose legal equality
leaders divert public funds/offices for own political gain
Ex: Zaire (DNC) under Mobutu Sese Seko, state predatory because enriched elites at expense of people
revenue from state controlled mines
Bureaucratic Rational State
explicit and equal rule of law
meritocratic civil service
Weber: most efficient and predictable political authority, long term economic growth
Ex: Historic civil service exam in China (merit based bueracracy)
Weak state
Struggles with basic government functions
enforcing law, collect taxes, manage economy, public infrastructure
Weak state capacity
Political instability from corruption and third party protection rackets
Ex: Weakness of local judiciaries/law enforcement allow drug cartels to challenge state authority in Mexico
Failed State
central political authority collapses
lose monopoly of force
widespread violence (civil wars)
humanitarian crisis
regional fragmentation
Still recognized internationally
Ex: Somalia in the 90s, state failure led to fragmented authority
Phantom State
internal domestic sovereignty
lacks external recognition
proves external recognition not needed for legitimacy
Ex: Somaliland broke away from Somalia and operates with sovereignty but not recognized
Nation
Human community bound by shared cultural historical or political ties that collectively desire self governance through a independent state
Imagined community
creates solidarity
willing to sacrifice for group
Ex: Poland maintained distinct culture and desire for self- determination even when split or consolidated
Nationalism
ideology
nation should be self governing
political state should align with national group
Wimmer: can be constructive or destructive
civic or ethnic
public goods and equality
inside/outside tension leads to violence
Ex: Anti-colonial movements in Africa/Asia used this to unite diverse populations against imperial rule
Ethnic Nationalism
national membership through shared customs, ethnic ancestry
ethnicity is ascriptive
exclude minorities from membership
Ex: Imperial Germany/ other European states’ identities relied on shared language and blood decent
Civic nationalism
national membership through shared politics, values, laws, citizenship
inclusive foundation
political stability in multi-ethnic states (equality)
Ex: Post- revolutionary France’s identity centered on principles of liberty, equality, citizenship
Slef-Determination
political principle
nation/ people have right to choose form of gov
Why european empires dismantled
Modern nation state relies on it
Ex: Kosovo declared political independence from Serbia (2008) b/c majority Albanian population, invoking this principle
Secession
Formal withdrawal of region from an existing state
Establish new independent state
Frequently leads to national conflict
Ex: South Sudan voted to leave Sudan (2011) after decades of civil war
Irredentism
Political campaign or foreign policy
seek to annex territories
grounds of common ethnicity or historical possession
Triggers interstate wars
Ex: Russia’s annexation of Crimea (2014) or Ukraine (present) justified by claims of reuniting Russian speaking populations
Democracy and Democratization
political system
power is exercised directly or indirectly by the public
through periodic, competitive, and fair elections
Individual freedom and equality
Hold leaders accountable to people
Ex: Ancient Athens through direct citizen assemblies. Spread globally in 19th and 20th centuries through representative systems
Liberal Democracy
political system/ regime
competitive elections
extensive guarantees for individual civil liberties, checks and balances, rule of law
majority rule can’t be used to oppress minorities or opposition
Ex: UK, Germany, Japan protect free speech, independent courts, regular party change
Electoral Democracy
political system
regular multiparty elections
lacks deep protections for civil liberties, judicial independence, rule of law
“procedural/hybrid” democracy
executive overreach and weak rights
Ex: Post Apartheid South Africa has free elections but single party dominance and inequality creates governing challenges
Democratization
political transition
autocratic regime to stable democratic system
Historically in waves through globe
Driven by economic modernization, civil society, international pressure, elite negotiations
Ex: Poland transitioned to a democracy when trade union negotiated end of single party rule
Modernization Theory
theoretical model
economic development leads to social shifts
urbanization, education, large middle class
fosters democratic rule
Inglehart & Welzel: industrial growth shifts values from survival to self expression
demand for democratic institutions
Ex: South Korea’s post war industrialization expanded educated urban middle class who then demanded democracy
Authoritarianism
Political regime
small group exercises power over state without constitutional responsibility to public
Limit political pluralism and participation
Relies on co-optation, clientelism, propaganda, selective representation
Ex: Mexico under PRI maintained rule through corporatist co-optation and controlled elections
Totalitarianism
extreme political regime
authoritarianism with ideological state
total control over all aspects of public and private life
no independent civil society
terror and state violence
all encompassing ideology
Ex: Stalin in USSR controlled through mass purges, media censorship, mandatory ideological alignment
Resource Curse
phenomenon
countries rich in valuable natural resources more likely to be autocratic
weak governance
low economic diversity
leaders/state funded by resources not taxes
no accountability to public
Ex: Nigeria and Venezuela have oil wealth and rampant corruption (clientelism), undermine other economic sectors, and no democratic accountability
Competitive Authoritarianism
hybrid regime
formal democratic institutions exist
incumbents abuse resources
media, courts (stacked or legal battles), gerrymandering
create doubt in democratic institutions
Playing field tilted in their party’s favor
Levitsky & Way: differ from dictatorships b/c opposition can contest power just unfair
Ex: Hungary under Orban, regular elections but his party used above methods to disadvantage opposition
Collective Action
coordinated activity
achieve common political, economic, social goal
Olson: suffers from free rider problem
rational actors decide to enjoy public goods without risking cost of participation
Ex: Strikes require coordination (like union) to overcome risk of job loss
Social Movement
organized network of people
sustained collective action
Lee: leverage political opportunities, organizations, and framing outside of legislative channels
Ex: Anti-Apartheid movement in South Africa organized mass boycotts, strikes, international support over decades
Civil Society
social organizations
voluntary
autonomous and independent of state control
check on state power
creates social trust and democratic participation
Ex: Unions, student groups, etc. provided infrastructure for democratic transition of Tunisia during Arab Spring
Non-Violent Protests
political action
relies on unarmed tactics to achieve political objective
marches, strikes, boycotts, disobedience
Chenoweth: 2x more successful than armed rebellion
attracts more participation
regime defections
Ex: Solidarity movement in Poland organized strikes and civil resistance forcing democracy negotiations
Social Media
communication platforms
enable decentralized rapid diffusion of information
Tucker: initially liberation tech for mobilization
autocrats learned how to manipulate by fear, friction, flooding
Ex: Arab spring, in Egypt, activists used social media to organize but regime shut down internet and flooded with propaganda
Presidentialism
democratic system
head of government and state is combined
fixed terms
directly elected
independent of legislature
executive stability
democratic accountability
risk gridlock between exec and legislature
winner take all politics
Ex: Brazil’s system of exec affairs head and fragmented multi-party congress
Parliamentarism
democratic system
prime minister is head of gov
directly elected legislature
they choose and hold PM accountable
Reduces gridlock (more efficient)
if party fractures creates instability
vote of confidence can keep or change PM
Ex: UK uses system where leader of majority party in House of Commons becomes PM
Semi- Presidentialism
hybrid democratic system
directly elected president
foreign power
Legislative appointed Prime minister
domestic power
flexible governance
risks cohabitation- gridlock in executive branch
when two figures from different parties
Ex: France has this system, when gridlocked contributes to protests
Single Member District (SMD) plurality
electoral system
candidate who receives the most votes wins the seat
plurality- don’t need majority, can be 2+ candidates
single member district
Duverger’s Law- system naturally encourage 2 party system
stable
minor third parties almost never win
Ex: UK uses system for house of commons, normally legislative majority for Labour or Conservative parties
Proportional Representation (PR)
electoral system
percentage of votes party receives in a district is proportional to the seats they win
multi member districts
reflect minority votes
encourage parties to work together
closed list PR system give party rulers control over candidate selection (no primaries)
Ex: Germany uses system so parties with 5+% of electoral vote have fair representation
Majority runoff
electoral system
candidate needs absolute majority
second round (runoff) between top choices
McClintock: Increase legitimacy and moderation
Ex: France famously uses this system, two candidates have to moderate in second round to win votes
Democratic Backsliding
degradation of democratic institutions
checks and balances, electoral laws, courts, media
civil liberty decline
state-led by popularly elected leaders
gradual so harder to identify and resist
replaced military coups
Ex: Orban in Hungary
Third wave Autocratization
Global trend
21st century
decline in democratic quality
rise in authoritarian rule
incremental legal erosion from within democracies
not coups
Ex: Eastern europe (Orban), latin america (Chavez- Ven.), and South Asia (Modi-India) all experienced exec overreach and weakened checks in last decades
Executive Takeover
elected exec dismantles checks on power
uses legal/ constitutional methods
increased exec power
Svolik: voters consent to democratic decline in return for partisan victories
polarization driven
Ex: Chavez in Venezuela constitutionally rewrote rules to consolidate presidential power
Polarization
division of society
ideological, social, political
mutually antagonistic and stubborn
High levels enable democratic erosion
partisans rather win than protect democracy
Ex: Polarization in Turkey forced voters to choose between partisan religious identity and democratic checks, incumbent could expand executive authority
Political Economy
interaction of state power and markets
allocation of economic resources
tradeoff between freedom and equality
framework of state dictates how wealth is made and distributed
influences stability and capacity
Ex: state led economic development in China and market led development in western europe
differing growth trajectories
Public Goods
goods/services secured or provided by the state
indivisible and equally available regardless of individuals contributions (non-excludable)
Private markets under provide non-excludable goods
infrastructure, defense, public health
state provides instead
Test for state capacity
Ex: All of the above examples in western europe are state funded
Economic Libralism
economic system
individual economic freedom
protects private property
more important that state intervention
free market allocates resources
max market efficiency and individual choice
minimal state regulation and taxes
higher income inequality
Ex: Thatcherite market deregulation in UK privatized state enterprises and cut taxes
Communism
economic system
state eliminates private property
no free market
central state planning for all economic activity
total economic equality
state in theory redistributes fairly
historically turns into authoritarian control and inefficient
Ex: USSR planned economy by setting prices, production quotas, resource allocation
Social Democracy
economic system
accepts private property
market competition
state intervention
progressive taxes
welfare programs
limits on inequality
strong state capacity to fund social programs
Ex: Sweden has private and competitive corporations and alot of unions, high social spending
State Led Development
economic strategy
state investments in private sectors, subsidizes industries, manages international trade
rapid growth
Karma: world bank acknowledged success in east asia
Ex: South korea directed growth towards private manufacturing firms (like Samsung) to build export industries
State Capitalism
economic system
for profit businesses owned and controlled by state
authoritarian control
Milanovic: “political capitalism” drives economic growth while maintaining political control
Ex: In China massive state omened enterprises dominate major sectors (energy, banking, etc.) alongside private firms
Neo Libralism
economic system
promotes free market capitalism
deregulation, private state assets, low taxes, reduced gov spending
Washinton consensus in 1980s
international financial institutions supported all should follow system
backlash b/c led to inequality
without established strength, reduction in scope led to weakened states
Ex: Latin American states in 90s opened markets under consensus
Welfare State
state funded public institutions and programs
creates social stability
protect citizens from economic risks
ex: old age
socialize risk across all of society
Expands purchasing power of lower/middle class
Ex: Germany provides universal healthcare, unemployment insurance, pensions
Inequality
unequal distribution of income, wealth, opportunity
among people or groups
Gini index
high inequality erodes social trust
more polarization
risks democratic erosion
Ex: South Africa
Colonialism
formal practice
imperial power establishes direct control over foreign territory
imposed arbitrary boarders
extractive economies
dependent on commodities
weak state institutions left over
Ex: British rule in nigeria created weak government and extractive economy based on oil
Dependent Development
Economic condition
developing nation depend on industrial nation
for investment, manufactured goods, technology
Limits economic sovereignty
have to import manufactured products and export commodities at a loss
Ex: Latin American economies (20th century) exported agricultural products to industrial nations
Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI)
developmental strategy
mercantilist (balance of trade)
state uses tariffs and subsidies to block foreign imports
grow domestic manufacturing
Built industrial capacity in Latin America
created inefficient domestic industries unable to compete globally
Ex: Mexico placed strict tariffs to build domestic private and state owned manufacturers
Inclusive institutions
political and economic rules
enforce private property rights, competition, and public investment
unbiased legal contracts
Acemoglu and Robinson: creative destruction (innovation)
long term economic growth
Ex: Compare nogles US to Nogles Mexico, disparity across boarder bc of inclusive v extractive institutions
Political Globalization
Expansion of politics
international institutions, supranational orgs
reduce sovereignty
global rights standards
prevent war
democratic deficit
Ex: EU
Economic Globalization
expansion of economic institutions
international trade, currency, foreign direct investment, global supply chains
Milanovic: income growth for asian middle class and global 1%, stagnation for western working class
Ex: World bank, ITC
Societal Globalization
Expansion of people and ideas
migration, culture, media, values
global civil society
nationalist backlash
cultural homogenization
Ex: Diaspora communities maintain ties with origin nations because of globalization