1/106
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Aim of loftus and palmers study
To investigate the effect of leading questions on memory recall in eyewitness testimony.
Background of loftus and Palmer
understanding how memory can be influenced by external factors, particularly when witnessing an event. Marshall found that people had difficulty estimating the speed of cars even if they knew that they would be asked about it.
Research Method in L&P
Lab Experiment
Design in L&P
Independent measures design
Verbs used in exp 1 in L and P
Smashed, hit, collided, bumped, Contacted
How many participants are in each experiment in Loftus and Palmers Study
Experiment 1: 45 students
Experiment 2 . 150 Students
Controls in Loftus and Palmers study
The same 7 films were shown
identical questions other than critical question
After each film, participants given questionare
Results for experiment 1 of Loftus
smashed- 40.5 mph
Contacted - 31.8 mph
Conclusion from Experiment 1 Of Loftus
-Results could be due to distorted memory by verbal label used to characterise the intensity of the crash in leading question
Variables in Experiment 2 for Loftus
IV: smashed, hit and control
DV: estimate of speed, recollection of broken glass
Results in Experiment 2 for Loftus
Smashed- 16/50
Hit- 7/50
Control- 6/50
Conclusion for Experiment 2 for Loftus
The first information obtained from perceiving an event, the second is information gotten from after the event and overtime the two sources may integrate in a way that they're unable to tell which source the informations from
Background for Grants study
Godden and Baddeley- asked to listen to 40 unrelated words either on the beach, or under water / then they were tested in the same (matching) or different (mismatching) conditions
Method of Grants study
Lab Experiment
Design for Grants Study
Independent measures
Variables in Grants study
IV: silent / noisy conditions & matching / mismatching
DV: recall on multiple Choice and Short answer questions.
Sample and sampling method for Grants Study
39 participants aged 17-56 (17 female, 23 male)
opportunity Sampling by 8 members of psychology class randomly assigned to conditions
Background noise in grants study
university cafe with occasional distinct words/phrases, general conversation, sounds of movement of chairs and dishes etc
What was the article on in grants study
Article on Psychoimmunology
Controls in Grants study
A break of 2 minutes between end of study the test to minimise recall from short-term memory.
Results of Grants study
Short Answer: Silent/Silent- 6.7, Noisy/Silent- 4.6
Multiple Choice: matching-14.3, mismatching- 12.7
Conclusions for grants study
context affects retrieval in both SAQ and MCQ tests students should study in quiet surroundings, as exams are typically held in silence.
Study and testing in the same environment leads to enhanced performance.
Background for Morays study
Cherrys cocktail party phenomenon using dichotic listening.
Cherry found that those who shadowed a message in one ear, were unaware of the content of the message in the other ear
Aim for Morays Study
Exp 1. To investigate the amount of information P’s could recognise from a rejected message
Exp 2. To investigate the effect of hearing one’s own name in the rejected message
Exp 3. To investigate the effects of instructions to identify a specific target in the rejected message
Sample in morays study
Exp 2- 12
Exp 3- 28
method in moray
Lab Experiment
design in moray
Exp 1- Repeated Measures
Exp 2- Repeated Measures
Exp 3- Independent Measures
summary of procedure in exp 1 morays study
A word list was repeated 35 times in the rejected (unattended) ear while participants shadowed a passage. Afterward, participants completed a recall test followed by a recognition test containing control words.
7 from the shadowed passage, 7 from the rejected passage ,7 from neither passage
variables in experiment 2 of morays study
IV: Whether the instruction in the rejected message was affective (the participant's name) or non-affective (not their name).
DV: The number of instructions recalled by the participants
summary of procedure in experiment 2 of morays study
Participants shadowed ten short passages of light fiction.
Rejected messages were played in the other ear which were not attended to, Moray wanted to find out of these messages would be heard if it included their name.
Results of Experiment 2 in Morays study
Affective instructions: 20/39
Non-affective instructions: 4/36
Variables in Experiment 3 in morays study
IV: Instructions given before shadowing (one group told they would be asked questions about the content of the rejected message vs. one group told to remember all the digits they could hear).
DV: The number of digits correctly recalled from the rejected message.
Conclusion for morays study
Moray believes when we focus our attention on one message we create an attentional block on the rejected message.
When we direct our attention to a message from one ear and reject a message from the other ear, almost none of the verbal content of the rejected message is able to get through this block.
Background of simon and chabris
Change blindness is a perceptual phenomenon that occurs when a change in a visual stimulus is introduced and the observer does not notice it.
method in simon and chabris
Lab Experiment
design in simon and chabris
Independent Measures
Sample and Sampling Techniques in Simon and Chabris study
192 participants
Each participant either volunteered to participate without compensation, received a large candy bar for participating, or was paid a single fee for participating ( Self Selected)
Variables in simon and chabris study
IV: white / black team
umbrella woman / gorilla
Easy / Hard Task -told to keep either a silent mental count of the total number of passes made by the attended team (Easy condition) or separate silent mental counts of the number of bounce passes and aerial passes made by the attended team
Opaque / Transparent Task
DV: number of participants that noticed unexpected event
Controls in Simon and Chabris Study
All experimenters trained to ensure that they were conducting the experiment in the same way
Written standardised instructions were given so all were asked the same questions and given same instructions
All participants tested individually
All watched either the transparent or the opaque video - duration of unexpected event/whole video was the same
Four video tapes, each 75 seconds in duration were created. Each tape showed two teams of three players
After 44-48 seconds of action either of two unexpected events occurred
Results in Simon and Chabris study
54% noticed the unexpected event
noticed: opaque condition (67%) than the transparent condition (42%)
noticed: easy (64%) than the hard (45%) condition
Conclusions in simon and chabris study
Individuals fail to notice an ongoing and highly salient but unexpected event if they are engaged in a primary monitoring task
The level of inattentional blindness depends on the difficulty of the primary task.
Individuals are more likely to notice unexpected events if these events are visually similar to the events they are paying attention to
Background for Banduras Study
Skinner (1938) introduced the idea of reinforcement to the Law of Effect. Operant conditioning is learning due to the consequences of behaviour, through positive reinforcement (rewards) or negative reinforcement (when you take something pleasant away).
Social learning theory : People observe a model carrying out a behaviour, Information about the behaviour is stored in memory and In a similar situation behaviour may be imitated. The behaviour may be reinforced by it’s consequences
Variables in Bandura Study
IV : Aggressive / Non-Aggressive
Gender of Child
Gender of model
DV : imitative physical / verbal aggressive behaviour
non imitative aggressive behaviour
non aggressive behaviour
partially imitated aggression
sample and sampling technique in banduras study
72 children (Stanford University nursery school)
36 boys & 36 girls ages 37 months - 69 months
opportunity sampling
controls in banduras study
Matched participants – matched on Pre-existing levels of aggression using 5 point scale
Ensuring all P’s have a level of aggression before being observed by the researcher.
Control group.
Double blind control.
Results in Banduras study
Boys in the aggressive model condition showed more aggressive responses if the model was male (mean average of 22.0) in comparison to if the model was female (mean average 12.4)
Girls in the aggressive model condition showed more imitative physical aggressive responses if the model was male (mean average of7.2), in comparison to if the model was female (mean average 5.5)
Children in the aggressive model condition made more aggressive response (the mean aggression score being 13.7), than children in the non-aggressive model condition (mean aggression score 6.7)
Conclusions in Banduras study
Observation and imitation may be important influences on behaviour, new behaviour may be learned this way without conditioning
Male models appear to have a greater influence on children’s behaviour
Background for Chaneys study
medical adherence in children especially with asthma has be seen as problematic.
Only 30% to 70% compliance with the regular administration of asthmatic medication.
Watt et al proposed that making the inhalers a more positive experience would improve medical adherence in young asthmatics.
Skinner
Method for Chaneys study
Field experiment
Design in chaneys study
Repeated Measures Design
Variables in Chaneys study
IV: Children used Breath-a-Tech
Children used funhaler
DV: The amount of adherence
Sample and sampling technique in Chaneys study
32 children, 22 males and 10 females aged 1.5-6 years from Australia (7 clinics)
Random Sampling Technique
Results in Chaneys study
59% used breath-a-tech day before
81% used funhaler day before
22/30 used funhaler successfully
3/30 breath-a-tech using successfully
68% of Children reported pleasure when using funnaler
Conclusion in Chaneys study
lmproved adherence, combined with satisfactory delivery characteristics, suggest that the Funhaler may be useful for management of young asthmatics.
background theories for Kohlberg Study
Freud-psychodynamic theory
Skinners-behaviourist theory
Piagets-cognitive theory
Theories explained in background of kohlbergs study
Freud-believed that behaviour can be explained through forces of the mind ; much of which is in the unconscious
Skinner- Moral development is shaped by our environment (external factors).
Piaget-moral reasoning develops through childhood and is completed by adolescence and young peoples morality is affected by authority
Three levels of moral development in kohlbergs Study
Pre Conventional
Conventional
Post conventional
Six Stages of moral development in Kohlbergs Study
Punishment and Obedience Orientation
Instrumental relavist Orientation
Good boy Good girl Orientation
Law and Order Orientation
Social Contract Orientation
Universal Principle Orientation
Sample in Kohlbergs study
75 American Boys from Canada, Taiwan, UK, Mexico and Turkey from ages 10-16 to 22-28 with three year intervals (cross cultural and cross sectional)
Controls in Kohlberg study
45 minutes long
9 dilemmas
Individual interviews
Results in kohlbergs study
Taiwanese boys aged 10-13 tended to give 'classic' Stage-2 responses.
Participants progressed through the stages one at a time and always in the same order.
A child at an earlier stage of development tends to move forward when confronted with the views of a child one stage further along
middle class children were found to be more advanced in moral judgement than matched lower class children.
No important differences were found in the development of moral thinking amongst religion
Conclusions in kohlbergs study
individuals go through the stages one at a time and they are in a fixed order, but some Individuals may not reach the final stage.
He also concluded that the order of stages is universal across all cultures.
middle-class children move more quickly and further through the stages compared to working-class children. This could be because of education. School children may be reminded of the importance of virtues, are able to practice good habits
Background for lees study
Freud- The super ego is morality principle , ID ego and superego
Piaget- proposed that we move through specific stages in our cognitive development linearly
Aim for lees study
To compare cross-cultural moral evaluations of lying and truth telling in situations involving pro social and antisocial behaviours in both collectivist and individualistic societies.
Method used for lees study
cross-cultural
cross-sectional
lab experiment & quasi experiment
independent measures design-either in physical or social condition
repeated measure design-given both prosocial and anti social stories
Sample of lees study
120 Chinese children of ages 7, 9 and 11
108 Canadian children of age 7, 9 and 11
Variables in lees study
IV- social story(involving a character whos actions may affect other people) Or physical story(involving objects)
Prosocial(child doing a good deed) Or antisocial(child carrying out a bad deed)
Lying or truth telling
DV- Rating given to story of characters deed
Rating given to what character said
controls used in lees study
children randomly assigned to prosocial or anti social conditions
a randomised table was used to determine order of stories to control for order effects
counterbalancing- half of the participants in each condition were read stories in a predetermined order and other, the opposite predetermined order
each story accompanied by picture so child can see what was happening

Results in Lees study
Both groups rated lying in antisocial situations negatively and truth telling positively
Chinese and Canadian children differed in their evaluations of lying and truth telling in prosocial situations
chinese children rated lying in prosocial situations significantly more positively than canadian (even more significant in older age groups in chinese children)