1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
How can cell signaling be classified based on the distance a signal travels from the signaling cell to the responding cell?
Endocrine
Secreted by distant cells (signal travels long distance)
Paracrine
Secreted by neighboring cells (signal travels short distance, local)
Autocrine
Signaling cell = responding cell (self-regulation)
Contact-dependent
Physical contact between membrane proteins on signaling cell and responding cell
Synaptic
Both close and far travel distance for signal
Electrical signal from distance
Very local chemical signal at synapse (example of paracrine)

How does the chemical nature of a signaling molecule (hydrophilic vs. hydrophobic) determine where its receptor must be located?
Thinking question: What differences in signal sequences and protein sorting pathways would you predict for each of their receptor proteins?
Hydrophilic signaling molecules are not permeable to membranes so rely on cell-surface receptors
Cell-surface receptors would contain an ER import signal and enter the endomembrane system involving entry into the ER, golgi and finally the plasma membrane via exocytosis
Hydrophobic signaling molecules are permeable to membranes so use intracellular receptors
Intracellular receptors located in cytosol would not contain a signal sequence. Intracellular receptors located in nucleus would contain a nuclear localization signal (NLS)

How is a receptor recognizing its signaling molecule similar to an enzyme recognizing its substrate?
Interactions between receptor and signaling molecule (ligand) are specific
Similar to enzyme binding substrate:
Same types of non-covalent interactions
Shape and chemical complementarity of receptor binding site to signaling molecule
How does the distance a signal travels impact the required binding affinity of its receptor?
For example, which of these should have a higher (“tighter”) binding affinity – chemical synaptic (paracrine/local signaling) or endocrine signaling (distant signaling)?
The further the distance a signal travels the higher the binding affinity of its receptor.
Endocrine signaling needs a higher binding affinity than chemical synaptic (paracrine) signaling.
In endocrine signaling, the signal is distributed throughout the body so there is a lower signal concentration at the receptor so there needs to be tight binding. In contrast, there is a high signal concentration at the receptor in the synapse, so binding doesn’t need to be as tight.

What are the main types of "molecular switches" used in cell signaling, and why are reversible "switches" essential for relaying signals inside the cell?
Molecular switches only have two conformations – ON or OFF. Only the ON conformation can interact with other proteins to relay signals.
Examples: protein phosphorylation, G-proteins (explained next flashcard)
Reversible molecular switches are essential because signaling pathways need to be turned on and turned off – activate pathway when signal arrives or inactivate pathway when signal disappears (respond to changes in environment)

What two things do all G-proteins do?? How do those two things make it a perfect molecular switch? What can't G-proteins do??
G-proteins do two things:
Bind GTP
Hydrolyze GTP to GDP (GTPase activity, it is an enzyme)
Perfect molecular switch:
2 conformations – GTP bound (ON) or GDP bound (OFF)
Reversible switch – can change between two conformations to be ON or OFF
G-proteins do not:
Phosphorylate GDP to GTP!

Why are amplification steps required for a strong cellular response? How would you identify if a step in a cascade is an amplification step?
When a signal binds to its receptor it is a 1:1 relationship. But amplification steps allow one protein/molecule to be activated and then many copies of the next molecule/protein to be produced in the cascade to create a strong response.
Amplification step can be identified if one step leads to the next step producing a lot of molecules/proteins thereby amplifying the signal (not a 1:1 relationship)

What are the key second messengers, and what allows them to be used to rapidly amplify and also end a cellular response?
Key second messengers: cAMP, Ca2+
Lots of starting material present to generate these second messengers = rapidly amplify signal. E.g. lots of ATP in cells to generate cAMP or lots of Ca2+ stored in smooth ER in muscles
Second messengers can be rapidly broken down/removed = end cellular response

What determines how rapidly a cell responds to a signal?Â
Speed of response = delivery of signal to receptor + reaction in cell
Reaction is main factor:
Change proteins already present in cell = fast response to signal
Change gene expression which produces new proteins = slow response to signal (but often longer-lasting)

Would you expect a faster or slower response from a hydrophobic signaling molecule? Why?
Hydrophobic signaling molecules cross plasma membrane and activate intracellular receptors. This usually results in changes in gene expression leading to a slower response.
Example: cortisol.

What three factors determine what response a cell has to a signal, and how can different cell types have different responses to the same signaling molecule?
Receptor for signal (no receptor, no response)
Type of receptor (determines which kinase is activated)
Targets present in that cell type
Different cell types will express different proteins. A kinase is often at end of signaling pathway so kinase will phosphorylate different target proteins specific to cell type = different response

Summary of basic steps in cell signaling :)
