Red Light Theory of Administrative Law (A. V. Dicey)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

A.V. Dicey

Legal scholar known for his principles of the rule of law, which underpin administrative law

2
New cards

How many administrative law principles does Dicey have?

3

3
New cards

Dicey principle 1

No Punishment Except for Breach of Law

4
New cards

No Punishment Except for Breach of Law

State authorities cannot impose punishment, restrict rights, or limit freedoms unless authorized by explicit law

5
New cards

Dicey principle 2

Equality before the law

6
New cards

Equality before the law

Every individual, regardless of rank or authority, is subject to ordinary law and courts

7
New cards

Dicey principle 3

Constitutional law derived from judicial decisions

8
New cards

Constitutional law derived from judicial decisions

Right derived and developed from court interpretation and application

9
New cards

Dicey’s opinion on Conseil d'État

Rejected its separate system opposed to empowerment of courts

10
New cards

Core tenets of Dicean model

Regular law supremacy

Legal backing required

Equality before ordinary courts

11
New cards

Dicey’s stance on discretion

Rejects, fearing abuse of power or illogical rulings

12
New cards

Realist critique of Dicean model

When courts enforce statutory boundaries, executive uses its legislative controls to legitimise their actions

13
New cards

Political and functional critique of Dicean model

Operating a social state requires significant administrative discretion and Dicey’s opposition to discretion creates friction

14
New cards

Systemic failures of Dicean model

Judicial bias against state action

Attenuation of electoral accountability

15
New cards

21st c. rule of law v. Dicey

Redefines Dicey's model by recognising necessity of and legistimising discretion