1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Question of the Case Study
To what extent does the operation of Shell in the Niger Delta illustrate how corporate power drives environmental poverty and hinders human development?
Why this case matters?
Shell extracts oil from Niger Delta since 1958
The region now supplies 90% of Nigeria’s export earnings and 2/3 of gov revenue
But Niger Delta remains one of the poorest and most polluted regions
What is this case example of?
Resource curce
What is resource curse?
A state with abundant natural wealth but weak regulatory capacity, in which a powerful MNC operates with more effective control over environmental outcomes than the government meant to regulate it
Core dilemma
Oil revenue is main financial driver in Nigeria
Federal government has an incentive not to enforce environmental law too strictly against Shell and IOCs
But decades of spills and gas flaring degrade fishing and farming based livelihoods of Delta communities
So the poverty the oil economy was supposed to relieve is exacerbated
Key Facts
Shell in Nigeria since 1958
90% of export earnings
10 000 spills in Delta over past decade, several million barrels cumulative since 1958
Bayelsa state poverty rate 89% (national av 63%) 2022 NBS) - despite being where oil was first struck
UNEP investigation
14 month (2011)
sampled 4000 sites
In Ogoniland groundwater contaminated with benzene up to 1800 times the WHO drinking-water guideline
What is the core of the issue?
Weather MNCs operating in a state with weak regulatory enforcement, can be held to the same environmental and human-rights standards it would face in its home jurisdiction
Background to the Issue
first began in Niger Delta at Oloibiri in 1956
Key scale of the issue: