PY 322: Respondent and Operant Conditioning Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/38

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering key definitions, principles, and historical studies of Operant Conditioning and Respondent Conditioning for PY 322.

39 Terms

1
New cards

Positive (+)

The addition or presentation of a stimulus to the environment.

2
New cards

Negative (-)

The removal or termination of a stimulus from the environment.

3
New cards

Reinforcement

Behavioral procedures or relations that increase the future frequency of a behavior.

4
New cards

Punishment

Behavioral procedures or relations that decrease the future frequency of a behavior.

5
New cards

Target of Reinforcement

A specific behavior to which reinforcement is applied, never a person or an animal.

6
New cards

Conditioning

A term synonymous with learning.

7
New cards

Operant Conditioning

A learning process defined by stimulus-response relationships where consequential stimuli (reinforcing or punishing) immediately follow a response, resulting in an increase or decrease in the future frequency of that response.

8
New cards

Law of Effect

A principle formulated by Edward Thorndike through puzzle box experiments, stating that responses made immediately prior to pleasant events are more likely to be repeated, while responses made prior to unpleasant events are more likely to diminish.

9
New cards

Behavioral Principles

Basic scientific laws derived from empirical research that describe functional relations between a behavior and its controlling environmental variable(s).

10
New cards

Positive Reinforcer

A stimulus that increases the future frequency of a response when its presentation follows that response.

11
New cards

Positive Reinforcement Contingency

The response-contingent presentation of a positive reinforcer resulting in an increased future frequency of that response.

12
New cards

Negative Reinforcer

An aversive stimulus that increases the future frequency of a response when its removal or termination follows that response.

13
New cards

Punisher

A stimulus that decreases the future frequency of a response when its presentation follows that response.

14
New cards

Positive Punishment Contingency

The response-contingent presentation of a punisher resulting in a decreased future frequency of that response.

15
New cards

Negative Punishment Contingency

The response-contingent removal of a reinforcer resulting in a decreased future frequency of that response.

16
New cards

Behavioral Contingency

The interrelationship between the occasion for a response, the response itself, and the outcome or consequence of that response.

17
New cards

Operant Extinction

The process of discontinuing the positive or negative reinforcement contingency for a previously reinforced response, causing the response frequency to decrease over time.

18
New cards

Extinction Burst

An initial, temporary increase in the intensity, frequency, or duration of a behavior immediately after reinforcement is withdrawn.

19
New cards

The Immediacy Principle

The rule that reinforcement is most effective when delivered immediately after a response, ideally with a 0 s0\,\text{s} delay, no longer than 1 s1\,\text{s} for immediate reinforcement standard, and within 60 s60\,\text{s} or less to alter behavior without verbal rules.

20
New cards

Delayed Reinforcement

The delivery of a reinforcer between 1 s1\,\text{s} and 60 s60\,\text{s} (or delayed delivery after 60 s60\,\text{s}) post-response, requiring the learner to understand behavioral contingencies.

21
New cards

Superstitious Behavior

Idiosyncratic behaviors that arise from arbitrary pairings of responses and consequences when delayed reinforcement inadvertently reinforces an unintended response.

22
New cards

Automaticity of Reinforcement

The principle that behavior is modified by consequences regardless of whether the individual has explicit cognitive awareness or understanding of the reinforcement contingency.

23
New cards

Rule

An explicit verbal description of a behavioral contingency.

24
New cards

Rule-Governed Behavior

Behavior under the control of a rule, where an individual learns through verbal statements or the experiences of others without directly contacting environmental consequences.

25
New cards

Contingency-Shaped Behavior

Behavior under the control of a direct-acting contingency where the learner directly experiences contact with environmental consequences.

26
New cards

Contingency Contract

A formal rule statement describing the desired or undesired behavior, the occasion when the behavior should or should not occur, and the added outcome for that behavior.

27
New cards

Self-Management

The implementation of a contingency contract where the person whose behavior is targeted performs one or more components of that contract across a six-step process.

28
New cards

Unconditioned Stimulus (US)

A stimulus that elicits a response without previous pairing with another stimulus.

29
New cards

Unconditioned Response (UR)

A response elicited by an unconditioned stimulus.

30
New cards

Conditioned Stimulus (CS)

A stimulus that elicits a response because of previous pairing with another stimulus.

31
New cards

Conditioned Response (CR)

A response elicited by a conditioned stimulus.

32
New cards

Respondent Conditioning

A learning process based on stimulus-stimulus pairing in which a neutral stimulus (NS) is paired with an unconditioned stimulus (US) until it becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) that elicits a conditioned response (CR).

33
New cards

Ivan Pavlov

The physiologist who accidentally discovered respondent conditioning in 19011901 during canine endocrine system experiments after noticing dogs salivated at the sight of the lab assistant.

34
New cards

Higher-Order Respondent Conditioning

The process of establishing a new conditioned stimulus by pairing a neutral stimulus with an already established conditioned stimulus.

35
New cards

Little Albert Experiment

A 19201920 study conducted by John B. Watson and his assistant that conditioned an infant to fear a white rat and furry objects by pairing the rat with a loud noise produced by striking an iron bar with a hammer.

36
New cards

Respondent Extinction

The process of repeatedly presenting a conditioned stimulus without pairing it with the unconditioned stimulus (or an established CS), causing the conditioned stimulus to lose its eliciting power.

37
New cards

Systematic Desensitization

A therapeutic behavior change procedure that combines relaxation techniques with a structured hierarchy of fear-producing stimuli arranged from least to most frightening.

38
New cards

In-Vivo Systematic Desensitization

An application of systematic desensitization where the client uses relaxation skills to directly face real-life, fear-producing situations.

39
New cards

Imagery Systematic Desensitization

An application of systematic desensitization conducted in a therapist's office where the client relaxes while imagining scenarios that closely resemble anxiety-provoking situations.