CLAT POST AUGUST B - LEGAL UPDATES

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/66

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:36 PM on 10/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

67 Terms

1
New cards

Who was in the bench that modified the operation of the three-year practice requirement for entry into subordinate judicial service on 21 Aug?

CJI Surya Kant, Justices AG Masih and KV Chandran.

2
New cards

What did this bench rule?

reduced the pre-examination req to 1 year and said it could be balanced by institutional training and supervised work

3
New cards

Who dismissed the review?

In minority opinion Justice Chandra

4
New cards

How did this new ruling come to be?

Arose out of review petitions filed against the court’s judgement of 20 May 2025 which reinstated the three-cycle.

5
New cards

What is the timelines for this ruling?

HC have been directed to amend their judicial service rules within 3 months and this scheme will run for 5 years after which its working will be examined on empirical material.

6
New cards

What did the court describe as the basis of intervention?

Court clarified that this intervention was not replacing experience but changing the way it will be implemented through pre-institutional training at State Judicial academy with supervised probation. In addition, the sudden application of the 3-year rule without transitional arrangement caused hardship to young lawyers and graduates. However court rejected the submission that postgraduate legal education should be treated as experience at the Bar.

7
New cards

What is the transitional window for this?

Recruitment notifications issued between 20 May 2025 and 31 March 2027 can apply for CIvil Judge (Junior division) w/o prior practice because they are automatically deemed to have completed a year.

8
New cards

What ist he post-selection framework?

  • First appointed as trainee Judicial officers for a year

  • Undergo a year of intensive training at the state judicial academy (eq to 1 year at bar)

  • Six months under principle district judge or members of the higher judicial service

  • Trainees recieve emoluments half of gross remuneration of a judicial magistrate first class

  • Regular judicial rank, pay scale and service benefits follow only on satisfactory completion and evaluation of the two-year program.


9
New cards

What was the 2002 All India Judges association case?

Court permitted fresh law graduates to enter judicial services without prior practice at the Bar

10
New cards

What did the Judgement of 20 May 2025 do?

Restored 3 year practice req

11
New cards

What did the review petitions contend?

Compulsory practice would deter talented graduates, proposed structured training and clerkships as alternatives.

12
New cards

What did the court maintina about entry-level judges?

Deal with life, liberty, property and eprsonal rights from the first day, requiring familiarity with court procedure and Bench-Bar dynamics.

13
New cards

What is Article 233?

Empowers the Governor to appoint, post and promote District Judges, in consultation with HC. Candidate from outside gov service requires at least 7 years experience as advocate or pleader and rec from HC.

14
New cards

What is Article 234?

Provides that persons other than District Judges are appointed by the Governor under rules framed after consultation with the State public services commission and HC.

15
New cards

What is Article 235?

Vests administrative, disciplinary and operational control over district courts and the subordinate judiciary in the respective HC.

16
New cards
What does Article 124 provide regarding Supreme Court appointments?
Provides for appointment of Supreme Court judges by the President in consultation with the CJI and other judges.
17
New cards
What does Article 217 provide regarding High Court appointments?
Provides for appointment of High Court judges by the President in consultation with the CJI, Governor, and Chief Justice of the concerned High Court.
18
New cards
Does the Constitution lay down a detailed process for appointing Supreme Court and High Court judges?
No, the Constitution lays down no detailed process for making these appointments.
19
New cards
What does Article 126 permit regarding an acting CJI?
Permits the President to appoint the senior-most available judge as acting CJI during a vacancy or absence.
20
New cards
What does Article 127 permit when a quorum is unavailable in the Supreme Court?
Permits the CJI, with the President's consent, to request a High Court judge to sit in the Supreme Court.
21
New cards
What does Article 128 permit regarding retired judges?
Permits the CJI, with the President's consent, to request a retired Supreme Court judge to sit for a specified period.
22
New cards
What governs the appointment and transfer of Supreme Court and High Court judges, and what is its legal basis?
The Collegium System; rests on judicial decisions rather than an Act of Parliament.
23
New cards
What did the First Judges Case (1981) hold regarding consultation under Articles 124(2) and 217?
Held that consultation does not mean concurrence, giving executive primacy in appointments.
24
New cards
How did the Second Judges Case (1993) change the appointment mechanism?
Overruled the First Judges Case, read consultation as concurrence, and made CJI's advice binding on the President after consulting two senior-most colleagues.
25
New cards
How was the Collegium body expanded in the Third Judges Case (1998)?
Expanded the body to the CJI and the four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
26
New cards
Who comprises the Supreme Court Collegium and a High Court Collegium?
Supreme Court: CJI + 4 senior-most judges | High Court: Chief Justice of that High Court + 2 senior-most judges.
27
New cards
What happens if the Government raises objections to a Collegium recommendation?
The Government may raise objections, but a reiterated recommendation is binding.
28
New cards
How is a successor Chief Justice of India (CJI) recommended?
The outgoing CJI recommends a successor, ordinarily by seniority.
29
New cards
What is the procedure for initiating recommendations for Supreme Court judges?
CJI initiates recommendation after consulting Collegium members & senior-most judge from candidate's parent High Court (opinions in writing).
30
New cards
What path does a judicial recommendation take after the CJI initiates it?
Travels to Law Minister -> Prime Minister -> President (HC CJ also consulted for High Court judges).
31
New cards
How was the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) established, and what was its intended purpose?
Established via 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2014; designed to replace collegium and prescribe appointment procedure.
32
New cards
What was the Supreme Court's ruling on the NJAC in 2015 and on what grounds?
Struck down in 2015 as unconstitutional, holding that it affected judicial independence.
33
New cards

Who presided over the State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jai Bir Singh and what was the matter of the case?

9 judge bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant over the matter of meaning of Industry under labor law.

34
New cards

What did was the bench examining and what was their decision?

They were examining the correctness of the expansive interpretation of “Industry” given to Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1946 by a seven judge bench in 1978. They held that the 1978 interpretation will continue to govern disputes still pending under the repealed 1947 act.

35
New cards

What did the court decide over the Industrial relations code, 2020?

Held that “industry” under Section 2(p) of this act must be read on its own text and scheme, and that the 1978 ruling will not be its “sheet” anchor.

36
New cards

What was the 1978 precedent case called?

Banglore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. Rajappa

37
New cards

What was the core idea of the Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. Rajappa?

Before 1978 is was unclear which organizations counted as an “industry” under Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The SC gave Section 2(j) a very broad and wide interpretation, bringing many non-traditional organizations under labor law protections, until this 1978 case.

38
New cards

What is the Triple test and what does it consist of?

The court of the 1978 case established that an activity qualifies as an industry if it satisfies three conditions

  • Systemic or organized activity

  • Cooperation between employer and employee

  • Production or distribution of goods or services to satisfy human wants and wishes.


39
New cards

Which factors were irrelevent in determination?

Court ruled that having a profit motive or capital investment is irrelevent.

40
New cards

What organizations were included as industry?

Hospitals, educational institutions, municipalities, clubs, and certain welfare activities were all brought under labor law protections.

41
New cards

Which organizations were excluded?

Core soverign functions of the government (such as defence, law and order, and the judiciary) were excluded.

42
New cards

What was the dominant nature test?

For organizations that carry out multiple mixed activities (some commercial/systematic and some non-industrial), the court established the dominant nature test to determine whether the main character of the overall enterprise qualifies as an industry.

43
New cards

Why does the definition of Industry matter?

Because it decides whether statutory labor protections and dispute resolution machinery applies to an establishments employees and the broad reading would allow workers to pursue claim on wages, working conditions, unionization, strikes and protection against arbitrary dismissal. In addition, a later constitution bench described the resulting rise in labor litiation as a docket explosion.

44
New cards

How did the State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jai Bir Singh (2005) start and how did it progress?

In this case, a 5 judge bench doubted the 1978 interpretation and referred it to a larger bench. In Jan 2017, a seven judge bench directed that the reference be placed before 9 judges. 9 judge bench framed four questions by an order of 16 feb 2026 covering the correctness of the triple test, the status of gov welfare activites, the scope of sovereign functions and any allied cause.

45
New cards

Was the 7 judge bench referring it to the 9 judge bench legal? If so how?

It was done correctly and legally because of precedent Stare Decisis in which existing legal precedents do not stop a larger bench from reconsidering a past ruling, provided the proper procedures are followed.

46
New cards

How did the 9-judge bench refine the “Triple Test” for an Industry?

The core framework remained however the last req was changed to “involve goods or services that have a discernible commercial character (similar to trade or business).

47
New cards

How is “Industry” applied to institutions and government with the new judgement?

An organization carrying out philanthropic work is not automatically excluded from being treated as a trade or business. Welfare activity and economic ventures run by the gov or statutory bodies are not exempt just because the State runs them. Core sovereign government functions remain excluded from being classified as an industry. However, separate/severable units operating within those government departments can still qualify as industry.

48
New cards

What happened to the Dominant Nature Test and 1982 Amendment ?

Dominant Nature test remained unchanged, and the 1982 amendment to the Industrial Dispute Act (which attempted to narrow the definition of an industry) was never brought into force and has no legal effect.

49
New cards

What happens to pending cases under the old law (1947 Act)?

Still be decided using the 1978 triple test.

50
New cards

What happens to previously settled decisions?

they will not be re-opened or disturbed.

51
New cards

What happens to future cases under the new law (2020 code)?

Disputes under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 will be governed by the new statutory ryles and interpreted afresh rather than relying on the old 1978 precedent.

52
New cards

What is the repeal date of the old provision Section 2(j) of the 1947 Act?

Officially repealed on 21 Nov, 2025 which is when the new 2020 code came into force.

53
New cards

What was the majority opinion in this recent case?

CJI’s opinion was supported by Justices Satish Chandra Sharma, Alk Aradhe, and Vipul M. Pancholi.

54
New cards

Which judge held that the reference to a larger Bench was unnecessary and hat the 1978 ruling needed no interference or modification, noting it had been followed in at least 84 later decisions across nearly 48 years?

Justice B.V. Nagarathna.

55
New cards

Which judges thought that institutional credibility depends on respecting finality, and that adding a “commercial character” requirement would defeat the purpose of the statutory scheme?

Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

56
New cards

Which judge held that no fresh interpretation was needed for a provision that had already been repealed, and that Section 2(p) must be read strictly on its own text?

Justice P.S Narasimha

57
New cards

Which judge agreed that the reference was validly made but declined to support the new reformulated test, holding that services from purely charitable institutions may be excluded with charitable character in general remains irrelevant?

Justice Joymalya Bagchi

58
New cards

What was the consensus in the end?

The overall split has been reported variously as 5:4, 6:3, or 4-4-1 because no single group of judges endorsed every single proposition.

59
New cards

How did the Parliament consolidate the labor codes?

Between 2019-20, Parliament merged 29 central labour laws into four simplified Codes:

  • Code on Wages, 2019

  • Industrial Relations Code, 2020

  • Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020

  • Code on Social Security, 2020.


60
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Expanded definition of worker

Now includes sales promotion employees, working journalists, and certain supervisory staff.

61
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Union Recognition Thresholds

Gives statutory recognition to unions. It requires a 51% membership threshold for a union to be named the sole Negotiating Union; if no single union reaches 51%, a negotiating council is formed.

62
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Fixed term employee benefits

Employees on a fixed-term contracts receive benefits comparable to permanent workers, including entitlement to gratuity after just one year.

63
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Strike Restrictions.

Requires a 14 day advance notice before striking and bans strikes during conciliation and tribunal proceedings.

64
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Government Permission for Lay offs/Closures

Establishments with 300 or more workers must obtain prior government permission before laying off, retrenching, or closing down.

65
New cards

Key features of Industrial relations code - Direct Access to industrial Tribunals.

Workers can go directly to an Industrial Tribunal if conciliation attempts fail within 90 days.

66
New cards
67
New cards