1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
transcribe skunk
/skʌŋk/
transcribe thirst
/θɝst/
transcribe shake
/ʃeɪk/
transcribe money
/mʌnɪ/
transcribe hungry
/hʌŋgɹɪ/
transcribe cactus
/kæktəs/
transcribe washer
/wɔʃɚ/
transcribe chickens
/tʃɪkənz/
use in stressed syllables
/eɪ/, /oʊ/, /ʌ/, /ɝ/
traditional theories
focus on behavior
linguistic theories
focus on describing patterns, structures, and contexts for articulation development
psycholinguistic theory
focuses on explaining phonology; used to map interactions between auditory input, underlying cognitive-linguistic processes, and speech production output
why do we have models of speech sound acquisition
linguistic models extend and enhance guidelines for assessment, analysis, and intervention; psycholinguistic models provide insights into underlying cognitive mechanisms
behavorist theory
babies learn to produce sounds by imitation and with positive reinforcement; watson, skinner, Pavlov
generative phonology
children are using the underlying representation of the sound to try and produce it; they learn the rules of their language to produce these sounds; Chomsky
natural phonology
children have adult-like representations but because of limitations they cannot yet produce the sound correctly so they produce phonological processes; Stampe
nonlinear theory
there’s a hierarchical relationship between phonological units; speech production is not just a string of phonemes and it considers many elements; CV → CVCV → CVC; Goldsmith
optimality theory
markedness and faithfulness constraints
children start producing simple speech (markedness)
and gradually adapt to more adult-like grammar (faithfulness)
Prince & Smolensky
sonority hypothesis
focuses on the loudness of sounds in a language; infants try to maintain as much sonority as possibly, favoring low sonority on the outside of syllables and higher sonority on the inside; Ladefoged
psycholinguistic models
combines linguistic and psychology to explain phonology in children; describes the interactions between auditory input, cognitive processes, and speech production output
3 categories of data collection
diary studies
cross-section studies
longitudinal studies
gold standard data collection method
large group longitudinal study
anatomical constraints on speech development
tongue is large in relation to oral cavity (forward/backward movements are limited)
need to develop expressive language (linguistic limitation)
starks stages for early vocalization
reflexive
control of phonation
expansion
canonical syllables
advanced forms
stark stage 1
reflexive
crying/fussing
stark stage 2
control of phonation
raspberries, clicks, laughing
stark stage 3
expansion
marginal babbling, producing 2+ vowels in a row
stark stage 4
canonical syllables
CV syllables, nonreduplicated syllables
stark stage 5
advanced forms
phonetically consistent forms, different consonants, vowels and syllable types
acquisition of vowels age
ages 3-4
intelligible to parents 80% of the time age
2
intelligible to strangers 80% of the time age
3
acquisition of consonants age
ages 8-9
master all speech sounds age
8-9
early 8 consonants
/m, b, j, n, w, d, p, h/
middle 8 consonants
/t, ŋ, k, g, f, v, tʃ, dʒ/
late 8 consonants
/ʃ, θ, s, z, ð, l, r, ʒ/
bottle → baba
reduplication
mouse → mow
final consonant deletion
cup → tup
fronting
fish → shish
alveolar assimilation
crash → cash
cluster reduction
vacuum → bacuum
stopping