1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Theism foundation for morality
god’s nature and character
humanism morality
human well being, reason, and concern for other
nihilism morality
no objective moral truths
Dr.Craig on why God provides a sound foundation for morality
if god does no exists, we may still have moral feelings and follow moral rules. No adequate foundation for objective moral values and duties
Dr.Kurtz response to Dr.Craig
moral argument for the existence of God
If God does not exists, objective moral values and duties do not exist.
objective moral values and duties do exist
therefore, God exists
why we know moral law exists
universal moral beliefs, moral disagreements, moral criticism, and moral obligations
how do 2 maps of scotland illustrate the existence of a moral law
maps can be compared against a standard of accuracy, human behavior can be compared against a standard of right and wrong
Moral absolutism
some moral truths are true regardless of what a person or society believes
moral relativism
moral judgements depends on a person’s perspective or a culture’s standards
how differences in cultural greetings fail to prove moral relativism
differences in customs or etiquette
different cultural practices do not automatically mean that moral truth itslef is relative
why americans no longer burn witches prove moral relativism
moral beliefs can change over time without the truth about morality changing
lewis wolpert’s darwinian explanation of morality
humans who cooperate with one another may be more successful at surviving than humans who never cooperate
How does Dr. Craig respond to the claim that people cannot be moral without believing in God?
does not claim that athetists cannont behave morally or that people must believe in God to know right or wrong
His argument is God is the ultimate foundation of objective moral values and duties
Why does Craig argue that a Darwinian view of morality is not objective?
evolution alone does not provide a sufficient foundation for objective moral duties
if selfishness benefited an organism in a particular situation, that would not automatically make selfishness morally right.
What morality did Hitler promote in Mein Kampf, and how did he use natural selection to justify the Holocaust?
promoted racist, antisemitic, and ultranationalist beliefs. he used natural selection to present racial hierarchy and domination as natural or desirable.
What is the logical problem of evil, and why has it been largely abandoned by philosophers?
the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of an all powerful, all knowing, and perfectly good God.
If god is all powerful, he can prevent evil
What is the probabilistic problem of evil?
the amount and kinds of suffering in the world makes God’s existence less likely
What is God's relationship to logical impossibilities according to C. S. Lewis and others?
omnipotence means God can do anything that is logically possible, not that God makes contradictions true.
How does Louis de Molina reconcile free will and predestination?
God knows what people will freely choose, God’s knowledge does not itself force them to make those choices
How does Christianity address the emotional problem of suffering?
christianity address the emotional problem of evil through God’s presence, Jesus’ suffering, compassion, and hope, and the promise of ultimate justice and restoration
sound deductive argument
valid and true premises
who made God
God does not begin to exists and therefore does not require a creator in the same way that things that begin to exist do.
first cause
proposed as uncaused, beginninglass, poweful, and not an ordinary physical object within the universe
fine tuning
The universe's physical constants appear compatible with life within specific ranges; theists argue this supports design.