1/240
Key in case of forgetting: Delete, double, check, flip
What is a correlation?
A statistical measure that expresses the extent to which two co-variables are related
Positive Correlation
Co-variables change in the same direction
Negative correlation
Co-variables change in opposite directions
What is the correlation co-efficient?
Shows the strength and direction of the correlation. Must be above +.8 for the study to be considered reliable/valid
Evaluation of correlations
Strengths:
May indicate connection
Don’t require manipulation of variables
High ecological validity
Weaknesses
Don’t prove causal relationships
Don’t reflect curvilinear relationships
Case studies
In depth investigation, description and analysis of individuals, groups, or institutions
Usually about something unusual
Mostly qualitative data
Happens over an extended period of time
Case Studies AO3
Strengths
Rich, detailed, qualitative insights into behaviour
Can e used to generate future hypothesises
Weaknesses
Generalisability
Subjective
Researcher bias
Low validity
Content analysis
Indirect Study of behaviour by examining communications
Observational
Coding- Analysis of the communication, identifying instances of the chosen categories
Thematic analysis- Identifying themes, implicit or explicit ideas within the data that are researched
Content analysis AO3
Strengths
Informed consent- easy as data is pre-existing
High external validity
Weaknesses
Indirect study analysed outside of the context it occurred
Bias risk- subjective
Reliability
A measure of consistency, if the experiment is repeated, you will get the same result
What is thematic analysis?
A qualitative research method in psychology used to identify, analyse, and report patterns (themes) within data, such as interview transcripts or text
What is validity?
How legitimate the results are
What is Internal Validity?
Does it measure what it’s supposed to
What is external validity?
Overall generalisability
What is Ecological Validity?
Form of external validity, generalisability to other settings/situations
What is temporal validity?
Form of external validity, generalisability over time
Ways of assessing validity
Face value- does it measure what it’s supposed to
Concurrent validity- assesses a new test's accuracy by comparing it to an established, validated measure (the "gold standard") administered at the same time
Ways of improving validity (each method)
Questionnaires: anonymous submission. lie scale
Interviews: Interpretive validity, triangulation
Observations: Minimal intervention by researcher, covert observations
Experiments: control groups, standardised procedures, single/double blind procedures
What is the mnemonic for stats tests?
Carrots Should Come Mashed With Swede Under Roast Potatoes
Chi- Squared (Carrots)
Test Of Difference
Nominal Data
Unrelated Design
Sign test (Should)
Test Of Difference
Nominal Data
Related Design
Chi- Squared (Come)
Test Of Association/Correlation
Nominal Data
Mann-Whitney (Mashed)
Test of difference
Unrelated design
Ordinal data
Wilcoxon (With)
Test of difference
Related design
Ordinal data
Spearman’s Rho (Swede)
Test of Association/Correlation
Ordinal Data
Unrelated T-Test (Under)
Test Of Difference
Unrelated Design
Interval data
Related T-Test (Roast)
Test Of Difference
Related Design
Interval Data
Pearson’s R (Potatoes)
Test Of Correlation/Association
Interval data
How to remember the table (other than the tests)
We Urc
Nominal (1st on 1st row)
Ordinal (2nd on 1st row)
Interval (3rd on 1st row)
Unrelated (1st column)
Related (2nd column)
Correlational (Top 3rd column)
All are test of difference EXCEPT for third column
How to chose difference or correlation
Should be obvious from hypothesis
Correlation looks for an association
Experimental designs Stats tests
Independent Groups: Unrelated
Matched pairs/ Repeated measures: Related
What are the different levels of measurement used in stats tests?
Nominal: Distinct individual categories
Ordinal: Data ordered by a scale, doesn’t have to be equal intervals and is subjective
Interval: Numerical scales of equal, precisely defined intervals
What is probability?
Likelihood of an event occurring`
What is significance?
How sure we are that a difference/correlation exists
Do stats tests work on probability or certainty?
Probability
What is the significance level
0.05% (0.01% for drugs)
What is a Type I error?
Null hypothesis rejected and alternative hypothesis accepted when it should be reversed
Optimistic error/ false positive
What is a Type II error?
Null hypothesis accepted and alternate rejected when it should be reversed
Pessimistic error/ false negative
What is a paradigm?
A standard, model, or typical example of something, acting as a framework or set of assumptions. Psych lacks a universally accepted paradigm, too much internal disagreement, conflicting approaches
What is a paradigm shift?
Scientific revolution when there’s a significant change in dominant unifying theory within a scientific discipline
What is a theory?
A set of general laws/principles that have the ability to explain certain behaviours. Occurs through gathering evidence- direct observation
What is deduction?
Process of deriving new hypotheses from existing theory
Scientific testing
Theories should suggest many hypotheses- it can then be tested systematically and objectively
What is falsifiability- Popper?
A key criterion of a scientific theory and scientific knowledge is provisional – the best we can do at the moment.
Theory of Falsifiability
A way of separating good science from pseudoscience. It suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be able to be tested and conceivably proven false. Science should attempt to disprove a theory rather than attempt to continually support theoretical hypotheses.
Replicability- Popper
If a theory is to be trusted, it must be shown to be repeatable across different contexts and circumstances
What is validity?
If repeated across numerous contexts, can generalise
Validity, replicability, and reliability
To achieve this, psychologists need to report their studies with as much precision and detail as possible
Empirical Method
Data on direct sensory experiences
Objective- no bias, emotions or personal opinions
Lab experiments are the most objective- most controlled
Locke- knowledge determined by experience and sensory perception. A theory cannot be scientific unless it has been empirically tested and verified
What is an abstract?
First section, but written last
Short summary of text
150-300 Words
Includes major elements such as the aim, methods, results, and conclusions
Introduction components
Literature review
Talk about existing studies/linked to what you are studying
Should follow logical progression: start broad, narrow down, until aim and hypothesis are presented.
Methods
Split into the following sections:
Design- groups/observations and justification
Sample- Who, method, target population
Materials- questionnaires, etc
Procedure- Standardised instructions and debrief
Ethics- How were they addressed?
Results
Summarise key findings
Descriptive stats- graphs, tables, etc
Inferential stats- stats tests
If qualitative, include themes or catagories
Discussion
Verbal/written summary rather than statistical summary of findings
Relate back to theories and studies from the introduction
Any limitations of the study are discussed and any ideas of how they could be addressed in future are presented
Wider applications of results
What is a hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a testable statement about the relationship between two or more Variables. It is an educated guess or a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation or observation
What is an aim?
An aim is a statement that describes what a study intends to achieve. It outlines the overall purpose or goal of the research, often in a broad sense.
What is the Experimental Method?
Manipulating an Independent Variable, to measure the effect on the Dependant Variable
What is H₀ ?
Null hypothesis.
What is H₁ ?
Alternate Hypothesis.
What are the 4 types of experiment?
Field, Laboratory, Natural, Quasi.
Field Experiment
A research method conducted in a natural, real-world setting instead of a lab, where researchers manipulate an independent variable to measure its effect on a dependent variable
What are the strengths of Field Experiments?
High ecological validity: The findings are more likely to be generalisable
Natural behaviour: Participants' behaviour is more natural and less affected by the artificiality of a laboratory.
Causal inference: Random assignment helps establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables.
What are the weaknesses of Field Experiments?
Less control: Researchers have less control over extraneous variables.
Ethical concerns: Participants might not be able to give informed consent if they are unaware they are in a study.
Difficult to replicate: The unpredictable nature of real-world settings can make it hard to replicate the experiment.
What is a Laboratory Experiment?
A research method conducted in a highly controlled environment where researchers manipulate one or more independent variables to measure their effect on a dependent variable.
What are the strengths of Laboratory experiments?
High internal validity: The tight control over variables means that a clear cause-and-effect relationship between the IV and DV can be established.
Replicability: The controlled, standardized procedures make it easier for other researchers to replicate the study and verify the findings.
What are the weaknesses of Laboratory experiments?
Low external or ecological validity: The artificial environment may not reflect real-world settings, making it difficult to generalize the results to everyday situations.
Potential for artificiality: Participants might change their behaviour because they are aware they are being studied, a phenomenon known as demand characteristics
What is a Natural experiment?
an observational study where researchers leverage a naturally occurring event or pre-existing situation to investigate the effect of an independent variable (IV) on a dependent variable
Strengths of Natural experiments
High External Validity: Real-world, natural settings, findings have high ecological validity and can be generalised.
Reduced Bias: Participants unaware they are part of a study, which minimizes the demand characteristics
Cost-Effectiveness: pragmatic and cost-effective research design
Real-World Application: useful tool for evaluating effectiveness of actual policies and interventions in complex social and political conditions.
What are the weaknesses of Natural experiments?
Difficulty Inferring Causation: It is difficult to establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship because the researcher has little or no control over extraneous or confounding variables.
Lack of Control: The researcher cannot manipulate the IV or randomly assign participants to conditions, which lowers internal validity.
Replication Difficulties: Due to the unique nature of naturally occurring events, it can be extremely difficult to replicate the study conditions.
Potential for Bias: Even without demand characteristics, other forms of bias can occur, such as observer bias or sample bias.
Data Limitations: Researchers often rely on retrospective data collected for other purposes, which may be inaccurate, incomplete, or difficult to access.
What is a Quasi experiment?
A type of research method that aims to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables but lacks random assignment of participants to groups.
What are the strengths of Quasi experiments?
High External Validity: Because they are often conducted in real-world, natural settings rather than artificial laboratory environments, the findings tend to be more generalizable to the broader population and other contexts.
Study of Naturally Occurring Events: Researchers can study the effects of naturally occurring events or pre-existing conditions that cannot be manipulated in a true experiment.
Cost-Effectiveness and Efficiency: These designs are often less expensive and time-consuming than true experiments, requiring fewer resources and potentially smaller sample sizes.
Higher Internal Validity than Non-Experimental Research: While lower than true experiments, quasi-experiments allow for more control over confounding variables.
What are the weaknesses of Quasi experiments?
Lower Internal Validity: The primary weakness is the inability to definitively establish a causal relationship due to the lack of random assignment.
Risk of Confounding Variables and Bias: There is a higher likelihood of confounding environmental and extraneous variables influencing the results.
Difficulty Ruling Out Alternative Explanations: The lack of control makes it challenging to rule out alternative explanations for the observed results, as any differences between groups could be due to pre-existing disparities rather than the independent variable.
Reliance on Retrospective Data: Retrospective data, often used in some quasi-experimental designs, can be inaccurate, incomplete, or difficult to access, potentially affecting the reliability of the findings.
Statistical Complexity: To account for potential biases and confounding variables, quasi-experimental studies may require the use of advanced statistical techniques such as multiple regression or propensity score matching.
Which types of experiments have high levels of Complexity?
Field, Natural, and sometimes Quasi
Which types of experiments have lower levels of complexity?
Laboratory, sometimes Quasi
Which types of experiments have high levels of Variable Control?
Laboratory Experiments
Which types of experiments have low levels of Variable Control?
Field, Natural, sometimes Quasi
Which type of experiments have high levels of Internal Validity?
Laboratory
Which types of experiments have low levels of Internal Validity?
Field, Natural, Quasi
Which types of experiments have high levels of External Validity?
Field, Natural, sometimes Quasi
Which types of experiments have low levels of External Validity?
Laboratory, sometimes Quasi
Which types of experiments have high levels of Demand Characteristics?
Laboratory, Natural, sometimes Quasi
Which type of experiments have low levels of Demand Characteristics?
Field
Which experiments have high levels of Realism?
Field, Natural, Quasi
Which type of experiments have low levels of Realism?
Laboratory
What is Non-Directional?
Increase/Decrease of the outcome is not specified.
What is Directional?
Increase/Decrease of the outcome is specified.
Are Extraneous Variables wanted?
No.
What is an extraneous variable?
Any Variable, other than the Independent Variable, that may affect the Dependant Variable. They are nuisance variables that don’t vary systematically with the Independent Variable.
What are confounding variables?
Any variable, other than the Independent Variable, that may effect the Dependent Variable. We cannot be sure of the true source of the changes. They vary systematically with the Independent Variable.
What are Demand Characteristics?
Any cue from the researcher or environment that may be interpreted as the purpose of the investigation.
What can Demand Characteristics lead to?
Participants changing their behaviour, making the findings less valid.
Investigator Effects
Any effect of the Investigator’s behaviour on the research outcome. This varies from the design of the study, to the selection of and interaction with participants during the study.
What is the Please-You Screw-You Effect?
Participant(s) conscious bias caused by known Demand Characteristics.
What is Randomisation?
The use of chance in order to control the effects of bias when choosing participants.
What is Standardisation?
Using exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions for all participants in a research study.
What is Social Desirability Bias?
A type of response bias that is the tendency of survey respondents to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favourably by others. It can lead participants to over-report 'good' behaviours or under-report 'bad' behaviours.
What is the Experimental design?
A systematic approach to planning and conducting scientific experiments to test hypotheses and establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables.
What is the Repeated Measures design?
An experimental method in which the same participants are used in all conditions of an experiment
What are the advantages to the Repeated Measures design?
Controls Individual Differences: Eliminates participant variables as a potential source of error.
Greater Statistical Power: By reducing variability caused by individual differences, the design increases the sensitivity to detect the true effects of the independent variable.
Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness: Requires fewer participants and resources.