Relationship Science: History, Methodology, Attraction, Love, and Gender

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the core concepts, theories, and historical frameworks of relationship science, including eras of marriage, methodologies, predictors of attraction, models of love, and evolutionary gender dynamics.

Last updated 10:50 PM on 10/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

30 Terms

1
New cards

The Pragmatic Era

The historical era of marriage (ending around 1850) during which life was precarious and marriage was primarily centered on meeting basic survival needs.

2
New cards

The Love-Based Era

The historical era of marriage (1850–1965) characterized by an increasing focus on personal fulfillment, cleaved psyche views, and specialized gender roles of breadwinner and homemaker.

3
New cards

Cleaved Psyche

A historical perspective within the Love-Based Era viewing the fundamental nature of manness and womaness as distinctly separate and specialized.

4
New cards

The Self-Expressive Era

The modern era of marriage (1965–present) where love remains crucial but is no longer sufficient, placing principal emphasis on self-expression and personal growth.

5
New cards

Normative Flux

The tension societies face between social norms that either tolerate false positives to reduce false negatives ('don't miss out' / valuing love connection) or tolerate false negatives to reduce false positives ('don't make mistakes' / avoiding rejection) during initiation behavior under uncertainty.

6
New cards

Indirect Measures

Assessment tools, such as PEPT reaction time measures where participants categorize words after a brief prime, that evaluate implicit attitudes beyond self-reports to predict newlywed satisfaction trajectories.

7
New cards

Romantic Attraction

The experience of finding someone desirable as a potential intimate partner.

8
New cards

Matching Phenomenon

The tendency of romantic partners to possess similar levels of physical appearance.

9
New cards

Vertical Attributes

Qualities on which individuals can be evaluated and ranked hierarchically, such as physical attractiveness, health status, and income levels.

10
New cards

Horizontal Attributes

Qualities on which individuals can differ without being judged as objectively better or worse than anyone else, such as food preferences, hobbies, political beliefs, and career choices.

11
New cards

Complementarity

The unsupported proposition that individuals are attracted to partners who have qualities that complement or contrast their own.

12
New cards

Unrequited Love

Love that is one-sided and not reciprocated by the other person.

13
New cards

Familiarity

A classic predictor of attraction where people exhibit increased liking for those they have encountered more frequently, driven by mere exposure.

14
New cards

Coolidge Effect

A phenomenon illustrated in sexual desire studies where sexual interest wanes after repeated exposure to the same stimulus but restores upon introduction of a novel stimulus.

15
New cards

Reciprocity

A classic predictor of attraction demonstrating our tendency to like people who like us, especially if they are selective toward others.

16
New cards

Dyadic Reciprocity

Attraction and liking that is uniquely shared between two specific individuals.

17
New cards

Generalized Reciprocity

The tendency for people who generally like everyone to be liked by others, which is desirable in platonic contexts but undesirable in romantic contexts.

18
New cards

Perceived Similarity

Liking individuals based on the belief that they share similar traits with oneself, despite empirical evidence showing that actual similarity does not reliably predict attraction.

19
New cards

Misattribution of Arousal

An error in judgment whereby an individual incorrectly attributes unrelated physiological activation to romantic attraction toward a target person, an effect that only enhances attraction if the target is already deemed attractive.

20
New cards

Mate Value

A person's overall desirability in the mating market, which drives individuals to pair up with partners of comparable desirability.

21
New cards

Triangular Model of Love

A framework proposing that love is constituted by different blends of three primary components: intimacy ('warm'), passion ('hot'), and decision/commitment ('cool').

22
New cards

Passionate Love

A state of intense longing for union with another person that functions like a craving, tending to be highest at the beginning of a relationship.

23
New cards

Companionate Love

The affection and deep attachment felt for individuals with whom our lives are intertwined, which typically strengthens as a relationship endures over time.

24
New cards

Sexual Selection

A specific form of natural selection arising from differences in mating success across individuals.

25
New cards

Intrasexual Selection

Direct competition among members of one sex for mating opportunities with the other sex, where the contested sex plays a relatively passive role.

26
New cards

Intersexual Selection

Competition to be chosen by the opposite sex via displays of attractive traits, where the selecting sex plays an active decision-making role.

27
New cards

Differential Parental Investment

The evolutionary principle asserting that the biological sex investing greater resources in producing and raising offspring will be more selective when choosing mates.

28
New cards

Single-Mindset Critique

The critique against traditional mating models, asserting that people do not enter relationships strictly with a short-term or long-term mindset because relational intent is ambiguous early on.

29
New cards

Social Roles Critique

The viewpoint proposing that biological factors channel men and women into differing social roles, which in turn shape their observed mate preferences.

30
New cards

Hypothetical Partners Critique

The finding that an individual's self-reported, stated mate preferences fail to predict their actual revealed attraction when interacting with real prospective partners.