1/95
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Hermann Ebbinghaus (1850-1909)
prove that we can examine concept of memory scientifically
use himself = control for individual differences
used nonsense syllables = control for stimulus differences
research applied to a “normal” individual
determine how we can “acquire” and “forget” information
Studies of Ebbinghaus
varied list sizes
varied time after “learning” material
varied time after reading material
varied number of reads
memory capacity (7+-2 items)
learning & forgetting curves
Free Recall Test
memory experiment where a person is asked to remember a list of items in any order they choose, without any hints or cue
Cued Recall Test
asks you to remember items after being given a hint, partial prompt, or associate (paired associates) (Ebbinghaus)
Recognition Tests
Ebbinghaus tested himself using nonsense syllables (three-letter consonant-vowel-consonant combinations like DAX or BIH) to strip away pre-existing meaning and measure pure memory
Savings Tests
measure memory retention indirectly by comparing the time or number of repetitions required to relearn a list of material versus learning it the first time (20 min vs 30 days) (Ebbinghaus)
Anterograde Amnesia
a memory disorder that prevents a person from forming new long-term memories after an inciting event or brain injury, while leaving pre-existing older memories largely intact
3 steps for memory
1) encoding
2) storage
3) retrieval
Encoding
the process of converting information into a form that will allow us to retrieve that information later
Storage
the process of retaining critical information for later use
Retrieval
the process of accessing the stored information that we have encoded in order to use it in a situation
Sensory Memory
involves all senses
last in memory for fraction of a second
infinite capacity
remember only relevant information
Sperling’s Sensory Memory Experiment (1960)
measured the capacity and duration of iconic memory (visual sensory memory) using a grid of 12 letters flashed for 1/20th of a second
This suggested human visual memory had a very small capacity. However, participants reported they had seen more letters but that the image faded before they could name them all
Short Term Memory
capacity of 7 ± 2 items
relevant information
information can be stored from between 10 seconds to a few days
memories are either forgotten or long-term memory
Long Term Memory
information from short term memory that was deemed as important
complex, susceptible to distortions and fabrications
Declarative Memory
things you know that you can tell others
episodic: remember first day of school
semantic: knowing the capital of France
Nondeclarative (Procedural) Memory
things you know that you can show by doing
skill learning: knowing how to ride a bicycle
priming: being more likely to use a word you recently heard
conditioning: salivating when you see a favorite food
The Serial Order Effect
psychological tendency to remember the first and last items in a series best while forgetting the items in the middle, creating a U-shaped recall curve
Primacy Effect
the ability to remember information at the beginning more easily
Recency Effect
the ability to remember information at the end more easily
Proactive Interference
new material is lost (not easily stored) due to old material
Retroactive Interference
Old material is lost (forgotten) due to new material
The Reconstruction Effect
tendency to include inaccurate information into our memories to “fill in the gaps” or “fix the errors”
Hindsight Bias
the ability to understand an event, decision, or situation only after it has already happened
Levels of Processing
successful conversion of the information from STM to LTM impacted by approach to make sense of the information
Deep Processing
broad connections, more assessment, attempt to explain
Shallow Processing
narrow or no connections, rote learning, no assessment or attempts to explain
Situation Dependency
taking a test in the same classroom that you studied in
State Dependency
drinking coffee before studying and a test
Memory Tricks
increased learning sessions
deeper processing efforts
increase primacy and recency effects
mnemonic devices
encoding/storage techniques that aid in the process of information retrieval
Chunking
groups individual bits of information into larger, meaningful units (called chunks) to expand short-term and working memory capacity
The Method of Loci
uses spatial memory and visual imagination to store and recall information
“g” factor
one specific overall level of intelligence
can be result of outside factors (health)
Spearman
Triarchic theory of intelligence
3 main levels of intelligence
Sternberg
analytiical, creative, practical
Theory of multiple intelligences
Gardner
Alfred Binet (1857-1911)
one of first to explore intelligence
tested student Theodore Simon on
sentence generation
naming body parts
remembering number strongs
The Binet-Simon Test
compare children of different ages in how well they performed skills
Mental age: the age the child’s responses were most indicative of
Chronological age: actual age of the child
Stanford-Binet IQ Test
designed by Lewis Terman at Stanford
wide range of ages
more topics: fluid reasoning, knowledge, quantitative reasoning, etc
IQ = MA/CA * 100
inborn ability to learn (Eugenics)
The Wechsler Scales
developed by David Wechsler
standardized the scoring system (avg=100, sd=15)
WAIS: 16+
WISC: children
verbal/non-verbal skills
minimize cultural and language biasing
Other IQ Tests
Raven’s progressive matrices tests
Kohs block design tests
Heritability
the proportion of a characteristic that can be attributed to biology/genetics
nature: attributed to biology (high)
nurture: amount that can be attributed to environment (low)
Jean Piaget (1896-1980)
assess work of Alfred Binet
cognitive development of children → theories of normal children cognitive development
studied his own children
Schema
a concept or mental framework that organizes and interprets information in the world
Equilibrium
a cognitive state of mind that comes from harmony between a child’s environment and present schema
Disequilibrium
a cognitive state of mind caued when new information contradicts current schemas
Assimilation
interpreting one’s new experience in terms of one’s existing schema
Accommodation
adating one’s current schemas to incorporate new information
Equilibration
shifting from one frame of mind to the next
Piaget’s Stages of Cognitive Development
1) Sensorimotor
2) Preoperational
3) Concrete Operational Stage
4) Formal Operational Stage
The Sensorimotor Stage
0-2 years
learning outcomes through senses
object permanence
sense of self
The Preoperational Stage
2-7 years
overcoming egocentrism
pretend play
symbolism (vocabulary, why?)
The Concrete Operational Stage
7-11 years
conservation
metacognition: think about your thinking
analogies, operations
The Formal Operational Stage
11-15 years
abstract reasoning
adolescent egocentrism: imaginary audience and personal fable
Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934)
researched cognitive development at the same time as Piaget
argued that developement can be accelerated
zone of proximal development + scaffolding
Zone of Proximal Development
areas where a learner can accomplish a cognitive task with guidance
Scaffolding
the process of teaching slightly above the current level of cognitive development in order to help the learner better understand
Developmental psychology
study of how and why the mind and related systems change throughout the lifespan
Apgar Scale
identifies physical and mental development as well as the ability to handle stress
Puberty
process of physical and mental change from childhood to adulthood
women: earlier (9-13) and slower, estrogen increases, testosterone 2x
men: later (11-15), testosterone 8x and estradiol (small increase)
Precocious Puberty
early onset and rapid progression of puberty
occurs more often in girls than boys
Genes
human cell has 20,500 genes
human genome: complete set of genes contained within each of us
Social Psychology
examine topics in a social context
Self-fulfilling prophecies
someone’s expectations changes their behavior as to increase the probability of the predicted event
phone conversation study
Stereotypes
over-generalized belief or expectation about a category of people, often problematic
Prejudice
an unjustified attitude toward a member of a group solely because they are a member of that group
Discrimination
unfair treatment of a member of a group, solely because they are a member of that group
Attributions (Internal and External)
the processes that we use in order to assign causes to behavior
Internal: explaining behaviors based on the internal characteristics of the person in question
skills, exhaustion, motivation
External: explaining behaviors based on the situation and surrounding environment
time, teacher
The Fundamental Attribution Error (correspondence bias)
our tendency to put greater weight on internal attributions when explaining the behavior of others
Actor-observer effect
the tendency to make internal attributions for the actions of others, while making external attributions for our own actions
Self-serving bias
the tendency to attribute personal failures to the situation, while attributing personal successes to ourselves
Conformity
maintaining or changing one’s behavior due to the real or imagined influence of others
Norms
social standards of behavior and thought that are set by a group
Public compliance
conforming to other people’s behavior publicly without necessarily believing in what the other people are doing or saying
Normative social influence
conforming to others in order to be accepted or belong to a group
Private acceptance
conforming to other people’s behaviors out of a genuine belief that what they are doing or saying is right
Informational social influence
changing opinions when we conform to people who we believe have accurate information
Requirements to conform
1) need for a quick response
2) need for a unanimous
3) no incentive for being correct
The bystander effect
decrease in likelihood of helping when with others
Pluralistic ignorance
a situation where a group rejects a norm privately, but incorrectly assumes the norm because of the inactivity of others
Diffusion of responsibility
people feel responsibility for their actions/inactions when they are in a group
Algorithms
mechanical
procedural
accurate
but time consuming
Heuristics
shortcuts
based on experience
prone to human errors
quick
Maximizing
in search of the best possible choice
quest for best can be unfulfilling
algorithmic approach
Satisficing
in search of the first satisfactory choice
may regret choice if presented with more information
heuristic approach
Representative Heuristic
a mental shortcut where you judge the probability of an object, person, or event by how closely it matches your existing mental prototype or stereotype
Base-rate information: how common each category is
Availability Heuristic
Assumption that if we can easily think of examples of a category then that category must be common
Confirmation Bias
tendency to accept a hypothesis and then look for evidence to support it instead of considering other possibilities or disconfirming information
Functional Fixedness
a cognitive bias that limits a person to using an object only in the way it is traditionally or customarily used
Erik Erikson (1902-1994)
1) trust vs mistrust (infant)
2) autonomy vs shame and doubt (toddler 1-3 years)
3) initiative vs guilt (preschool 3-6 years)
4) industry vs inferiority (preadolescent 6-12 years)
5) identity vs role confusion( adolescent teens)
6) intimacy vs isolation (young adult 20s)
7) generativity vs stagnation (late 20s to retirement)
8) ego integrity vs despair (after retirement)
James Marcia’s Identity Status Theory
Identity Achievement: explored, decisions made
Identity Foreclosure: not explored, decisions made
Identity Moratorium: explored, decisions not made
Identity Diffusion: not explored, decisions not made
John Bowlby (1907-1990)
infants predisposed to bond/attach to caregivers
Proximity maintenance: stay nearby/protest separation
Secure base: feel secure to explore
Safe Haven: have a caregiver to return to for comfort
Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation
Secure
Anxious/Resistant
Avoidant
Disorganized
Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987)
theory stems from Piaget
Level 1: 9 and younger
preconventional → values in external events
Level 2: adolescents & adults
conventional → performing right roles
Level 3: postconventional
shared standards, rights and duties
Attraction
pull to evaluate another person a positive or negative way
Factors that establish relationships
1) proximity, mere-exposure effect
2) similarity
3) equity/exchange
4) physical attractiveness
5) gender preferences
Gender Bias in Mate Selection
much discretion for male partner
little discretion for female partner