1/137
Looks like no tags are added yet.
What is the criminal justice system supposed to do?
Enforce laws, decide criminal cases, and carry out consequences through police, courts, and corrections.
Social control
Keeping people’s behavior within society’s rules.
Police
Investigate crimes and catch suspects.
Courts
Decide criminal cases and impose sentences.
Corrections
Carry out sentences through confinement, supervision, and rehabilitation.
Discretion
An official’s ability to use personal judgment, such as choosing between a warning and an arrest.
Basic criminal justice sequence
Investigation → arrest → charges → court proceedings → determination of guilt → sentencing if convicted → corrections.
Arraignment
The defendant hears the charges and enters a plea.
Plea bargain
An agreement to plead guilty in exchange for a concession involving charges or punishment.
Trial versus sentencing
A trial determines guilt; sentencing determines the consequence after conviction.
Appeal
Asking a higher court to review possible legal errors.
Wedding Cake Model
Cases receive different treatment depending on seriousness and public attention.
Wedding Cake Model layers
Celebrated cases at the top, then serious felonies, less serious felonies, and misdemeanors at the bottom.
Why are misdemeanors at the bottom of the wedding cake?
They make up the largest group and are usually processed more routinely.
Crime control perspective
Protect society by catching and punishing offenders. Think punishment and deterrence.
Rehabilitation perspective
Help offenders change through counseling, treatment, education, and better opportunities.
Due process perspective
Protect people’s rights and make sure the government follows fair procedures.
Nonintervention perspective
Keep criminal justice involvement as limited as possible to avoid unnecessary harm and labeling.
Equal justice perspective
Treat comparable people and cases consistently.
Restorative justice perspective
Repair the harm caused by crime and promote healing for victims, offenders, and communities.
Rehabilitation versus restorative justice
Rehabilitation focuses on changing the offender; restorative justice focuses on repairing harm.
Due process versus equal justice
Due process asks whether procedures and rights are fair; equal justice asks whether comparable cases receive consistent treatment.
Diversion
Redirecting someone into an alternative program instead of ordinary criminal prosecution.
Decriminalization
Removing criminal penalties from an activity.
Decarceration
Reducing the use of jail and prison.
Consensus view of crime
Laws reflect what society generally agrees is harmful.
Conflict view of crime
Powerful groups use laws to protect their interests and maintain control.
Interactionist view of crime
Influential people help decide which behaviors society labels criminal.
Conflict versus interactionist views
Conflict emphasizes unequal power; interactionism emphasizes how behavior gets defined and labeled.
Violent crime
Force or threats against people.
Property crime
Stealing, damaging, or unlawfully invading property.
Public order crime
Conduct prohibited because it violates public order or accepted social standards.
Economic crime
Financial wrongdoing, including white-collar and corporate crime.
Organized crime
Ongoing criminal activity carried out by an organized group.
Choice theory
People commit crime when they think the reward is worth the risk.
Trait theories
Biological or enduring personal characteristics influence behavior.
Psychological theories
Personality, thinking, or psychological development helps explain behavior.
Sociological theories
Social conditions such as poverty, unemployment, and inequality influence crime.
Social process theories
Relationships and social experiences shape criminal behavior.
Developmental theories
Experiences and events across a person’s life influence how offending begins, changes, or stops.
General deterrence
Punishing someone to discourage other people from committing crimes.
Specific deterrence
Punishing someone to discourage that same person from offending again.
General versus specific deterrence
General targets the wider public; specific targets the individual offender.
Psychodynamic theory
Early childhood experiences shape personality and the ability to control impulses.
Cognitive theory
How people think about and interpret the world influences their behavior.
Anomie
Social rules are weak, unclear, or breaking down.
Social structure theory
A person’s position in society affects their opportunities, pressures, and risk of offending.
Social learning theory
People learn criminal behavior through others and through rewards or approval.
Differential association
Criminal attitudes and techniques are learned through close relationships.
Social control theory
Bonds to family, school, and society help keep people from offending.
Labeling theory
Being treated as a criminal can become part of someone’s identity and encourage further offending.
Learning versus control versus labeling
Learning means acquiring criminal behavior; control means bonds restrain behavior; labeling means social reactions shape identity.
Latent-trait theory
An underlying characteristic established early in life continues to influence behavior.
General theory of crime
Low self-control helps explain why some people pursue immediate rewards despite consequences.
Age-graded theory
Turning points, such as stable work or supportive relationships, can change someone’s criminal path.
Trajectory theory
People follow different patterns of offending rather than one universal path.
Adolescent-limited offending
Offending mainly during the teenage years that fades in adulthood.
Life-course-persistent offending
Offending that starts early and continues into adulthood.
Victim precipitation theory
Examines the victim’s role in the interaction leading to an incident; it does not mean the victim deserved harm.
Lifestyle theory
A person’s regular activities affect how often they encounter potential offenders.
Routine activities theory
Crime becomes more likely when a willing offender, an accessible target, and missing protection come together.
Capable guardian
A person or protective presence that can discourage or interrupt crime.
Routine activities example
A willing thief finds an unattended phone with nobody watching. The thief, target, and missing guardian come together.
Lifestyle versus routine activities
Lifestyle focuses on regular exposure to risk; routine activities focuses on the conditions creating a crime opportunity.
Substantive criminal law
Defines what is illegal and what punishment is authorized.
Procedural criminal law
Defines how police and courts must handle criminal cases.
Substantive versus procedural example
A law defining robbery is substantive; a rule governing police searches is procedural.
Civil law
Noncriminal matters such as contracts, property disputes, and injury claims.
Public law
Law governing relationships involving government.
Tort law
Civil law dealing with wrongful injuries and harms.
Felony versus misdemeanor
A felony is a more serious offense; a misdemeanor is a less serious offense.
Actus reus
The guilty act—what someone did or failed to do when legally required.
Mens rea
The guilty mind—the intent or mental state required for the offense.
Actus reus versus mens rea
Actus reus is the behavior; mens rea is the required state of mind.
Concurrence
The criminal act and required mental state must connect.
Proximate cause
The person’s conduct must have a sufficiently direct connection to the resulting harm.
Excuse defense
The person argues that a condition affecting responsibility means they should not be held criminally responsible.
Justification defense
The person argues that the action was necessary or justified under the circumstances.
Duress
Someone threatens serious harm and forces a person to act.
Insanity defense
A mental condition prevents criminal responsibility under the applicable legal standard.
Intoxication defense
The lecture emphasizes involuntary intoxication, such as being drugged without knowing.
Age defense
A child may be too young to have criminal capacity.
Entrapment
Government improperly induces a crime by someone who was not already predisposed to commit it.
Consent defense
The other person agreed to the conduct, where consent is legally a valid defense.
Self-defense
Using reasonably necessary force to protect oneself from imminent unlawful harm.
Necessity
Breaking a law in an emergency to prevent a greater harm.
Duress versus necessity
Duress involves a coercive threat from someone; necessity involves avoiding a greater harm under emergency circumstances.
Fourth Amendment
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Think searches, arrests, and warrants.
Fifth Amendment
Protects against compelled self-incrimination and double jeopardy and guarantees due process.
Sixth Amendment
Protects criminal trial rights, including the right to an attorney.
Eighth Amendment
Prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.
Fourteenth Amendment
Guarantees due process and equal protection and applies many constitutional protections to state governments.
Due process
The government must respect legal rights and use fair procedures.
Proactive policing
Police take initiative against crime instead of waiting for incidents and calls.
Broken windows policing
Addressing minor disorder because it may create fear and encourage more serious crime.
Community-oriented policing
Police build partnerships with residents.
Problem-oriented policing
Police identify and address the underlying causes of recurring problems.
Intelligence-led policing
Police analyze information to guide decisions.
Community versus problem-oriented versus intelligence-led policing
Community means partnerships; problem-oriented means underlying causes; intelligence-led means analyzed information.
Racial profiling
Race influences decisions about whom police stop, question, search, or investigate.