Research Methods: Observation, Bias, Reliability & Validity

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/164

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:17 AM on 10/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

165 Terms

1
New cards

Research

A systematic, intentional, and iterative process of building knowledge about the world.

2
New cards

Research vs. everyday thinking

Research uses systematic methods, evidence, and critical analysis to minimize biases.

3
New cards

Qualitative research

Research that explores meanings and experiences using observations, words, and narratives.

4
New cards

Quantitative research

Research that uses numerical measurements and statistical analysis to test hypotheses.

5
New cards

Mixed methods

Research combining qualitative and quantitative approaches.

6
New cards

Inductive reasoning

Bottom-up reasoning that uses observations and patterns to develop theories.

7
New cards

Deductive reasoning

Top-down reasoning that starts with a theory and tests predictions using data.

8
New cards

Research cycle

Theories lead to hypotheses, which are tested using observations that can support or revise theories.

9
New cards

Theory

A model or explanation of how the world works.

10
New cards

Hypothesis

A specific, testable, and falsifiable prediction.

11
New cards

Falsifiability

A hypothesis must be capable of being disproven by evidence.

12
New cards

Exploratory research

Research that investigates a topic to discover patterns or generate hypotheses.

13
New cards

Positionality

A researcher's personal identities, beliefs, experiences, and judgments.

14
New cards

Reflexivity

Reflecting on how one's positionality influences the research process.

15
New cards

Availability heuristic

Relying on information that comes easily to mind.

16
New cards

Recognition heuristic

Preferring a familiar option over an unfamiliar one.

17
New cards

Confirmation bias

Favoring information that supports existing beliefs.

18
New cards

Anchoring bias

Overreliance on initial information or impressions.

19
New cards

Framing effect

The way information is presented influences judgments.

20
New cards

Cognitive bias

A systematic distortion in thinking or judgment.

21
New cards

Small worlds

Specific social groups or settings studied in depth in qualitative research.

22
New cards

Thick description

Detailed description of behavior and its social or cultural context.

23
New cards

Thin description

Description of observable behavior without extensive contextual interpretation.

24
New cards

Generalizability

The extent to which findings from a sample apply to a larger population.

25
New cards

Experimental research

Research in which investigators manipulate variables to test their effects.

26
New cards

Correlational research

Research examining associations between variables without manipulating them.

27
New cards

Observational research

Systematically recording behavior or events without necessarily manipulating variables.

28
New cards

Naturalistic observation

Observing behavior in its ordinary environment.

29
New cards

Controlled observation

Observing behavior in a setting or situation arranged by the researcher.

30
New cards

Participant observation

Research in which the investigator participates in the group or activity being studied.

31
New cards

Public observation

Observing behavior in a setting accessible to the public.

32
New cards

Field notes

Detailed records of observations, context, and relevant events.

33
New cards

Audit trail

Documentation of how data were collected, coded, and analyzed.

34
New cards

Qualitative observational data

Non-numerical descriptions of behavior, interactions, and context.

35
New cards

Quantifying observations

Converting observed behaviors into counts, frequencies, or percentages.

36
New cards

Reliability

The consistency of measurements or research findings.

37
New cards

Validity

The extent to which a method measures or captures what it intends to study.

38
New cards

Inter-rater reliability

The extent to which different observers agree in their ratings or coding.

39
New cards

Percent agreement

The percentage of observations on which raters agree.

40
New cards

Cohen's kappa

A measure of agreement between raters that accounts for chance agreement.

41
New cards

Pearson's r

A correlation coefficient measuring the strength and direction of a linear relationship.

42
New cards

Researcher triangulation

Using multiple researchers to compare observations or interpretations.

43
New cards

Data triangulation

Using multiple participants, sources, or measurements to examine a phenomenon.

44
New cards

Methodological triangulation

Using multiple research methods to study the same phenomenon.

45
New cards

Member checking

Asking participants to verify the accuracy of transcripts, interpretations, or findings.

46
New cards

Replication

Repeating a study to assess whether findings are consistent.

47
New cards

Observer training

Preparing observers to record or code behavior consistently.

48
New cards

Trustworthiness

The credibility and rigor of qualitative research findings.

49
New cards

Gamma or Yule's Q

A measure of association used in the class example to examine whether behaviors occur together.

50
New cards

Positive association

Two behaviors or variables tend to occur together.

51
New cards

Negative association

As one behavior or variable occurs more, the other tends to occur less.

52
New cards

Correlation vs. causation

An association between variables does not establish that one causes the other.

53
New cards

Geller et al. (1986)

Naturalistic observations of beer drinking among college students.

54
New cards

Kraut and Johnston (1979)

Observational study examining smiling and its social and emotional associations.

55
New cards

Levine and Norenzayan (1999)

Study comparing the pace of life across 31 countries.

56
New cards

Observational study with statistical analysis

Research that systematically observes behavior and quantitatively analyzes the resulting data.

57
New cards

Research ethics

Principles governing responsible research and protection of participants.

58
New cards

Nuremberg Code (1947)

Ethical code emphasizing voluntary consent, minimizing harm, and the right to withdraw.

59
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki (1964)

Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants.

60
New cards

Tuskegee syphilis study

Unethical study involving deception and withholding treatment that contributed to reforms in research ethics.

61
New cards

National Research Act (1974)

US legislation establishing a framework for protecting human research participants and IRB oversight.

62
New cards

Belmont Report

Ethical framework emphasizing respect for persons, beneficence, and justice.

63
New cards

Respect for persons

Respecting autonomy and protecting individuals with diminished autonomy.

64
New cards

Beneficence

Maximizing possible benefits while minimizing potential harms.

65
New cards

Justice

Fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research.

66
New cards

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Committee that reviews research involving human participants to protect their rights and welfare.

67
New cards

Informed consent

Voluntary agreement to participate after receiving relevant information about a study.

68
New cards

Voluntary participation

Participants choose freely whether to participate without coercion.

69
New cards

Right to withdraw

Participants can stop participating without penalty.

70
New cards

Coercion

Using threats or pressure to influence participation.

71
New cards

Deception

Deliberately withholding or misrepresenting information about a study.

72
New cards

Debriefing

Explaining the study to participants afterward, especially when deception was used.

73
New cards

Confidentiality

Researchers know participants' identities but protect their information from disclosure.

74
New cards

Anonymity

Participants' identities are not known or linked to their responses.

75
New cards

Privacy

A person's control over access to themselves and their personal information.

76
New cards

Risk-benefit assessment

Evaluating whether potential research benefits justify the risks to participants.

77
New cards

Vulnerable populations

Groups needing additional protections because of increased risk or reduced ability to consent.

78
New cards

Research integrity

Conducting and reporting research honestly and responsibly.

79
New cards

Fabrication

Inventing research data or results.

80
New cards

Plagiarism

Presenting another person's work or ideas as one's own.

81
New cards

Scientific misconduct

Serious violations of responsible research practices, including fabrication and plagiarism.

82
New cards

IRB approval

Ethical review and authorization required for studies subject to IRB oversight before research begins.

83
New cards

Interview research

Collecting detailed self-reported experiences and perspectives through purposeful conversations.

84
New cards

Purpose of qualitative interviews

Understanding participants' experiences, meanings, and perspectives in depth.

85
New cards

Interview research approach

Generally qualitative, exploratory, and inductive.

86
New cards

Interview data

Narratives, stories, experiences, and spoken responses.

87
New cards

Structured interview

Interview using standardized questions in a predetermined order.

88
New cards

Semi-structured interview

Interview guided by prepared questions while allowing follow-up questions.

89
New cards

Unstructured interview

Flexible conversation with few predetermined questions.

90
New cards

Open-ended question

Question allowing participants to answer in their own words.

91
New cards

Closed-ended question

Question restricting responses to predetermined options or short answers.

92
New cards

Rapport

A trusting and comfortable relationship between interviewer and participant.

93
New cards

Probing question

Follow-up question that encourages elaboration or clarification.

94
New cards

Leading question

Question worded to suggest or encourage a particular response.

95
New cards

Acquiescence bias

Tendency to agree with statements or questions regardless of actual beliefs.

96
New cards

Double-barreled question

A question asking about two different things at once.

97
New cards

Interview sampling

Selecting participants who can provide relevant information about the research topic.

98
New cards

Snowball sampling

Recruiting additional participants through referrals from existing participants.

99
New cards

Non-probability sampling

Sampling in which individuals do not have a known probability of selection.

100
New cards

Interviewer positionality

How the interviewer's background, beliefs, and experiences may affect the interview.