1/67
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
four main domains of human development
physical (body changes)
personal (identity and personality changes)
social (changes in relationships with others)
cognitive (changes in thinking)
maturation
occurs naturally, largely under genetic control (physical development)
but very influenced by the resources (ex: the availability of food → the child’s nutritional state)
cannot speed up (by good teaching) development beyond what is allowed by physical maturation
learning
interactions with environment (social development)
active exploration of environment (social and physical)
social transmission (watching how others behave and being guided)
nature vs nurture
genes expressed within an environment
neither nurture nor nature function by themselves
anything we do is the result of some interaction between heredity and the environment
how heritable traits are expressed varies by culture and environment
principles of development
people develop at different rates
expectations of specific ages → ages = guidelines (very wide variation around guidelines)
development is orderly (more apparent with physical abilities)
development is gradual
may have apparent backtracking (when skill isn’t fully in place → mistakes can be made)
Piaget’s theory of cognitive development
children think differently than adults (qualitative change)
2 basic tendencies:
organization: organize thoughts and behaviour into schemas (blueprints for what we expect things to be like)
adaptation: adjust to the environment (always improving schemas)
assimilation: assimilate info into existing schemas (new info that fits well into schema → strengthened)
accommodation: modify or create new schemas
equilibration: schema accurate → expectancy and experience match, requires assimilation and accommodation for balance
disequilibrium: mismatch of expectation and experience; uncomfortable
Piaget’s discrete stages of development
sensorimotor (not covered)
preoperational stage (2-6/7 years, JK - grade 2):
make-believe emerges at 2 (pretend play)
semiotic function: ability to think in symbols (numbers and language)
egocentric thought (not being able to take someone else’s perspective)
one-way logic → failure of conservation (ex: kid thinks cutting a sandwich gives them more)
concrete operational (7-11 years, grades 3-6)
conservation
solve concrete problems in a logical manner (for concrete objects/actions, error with abstract ideas)
formal operational (11 years →, grade 7 →):
abstract thought (problems, words, metaphors, satire)
transcend concrete situations (social issues, personal identity)
adolescent egocentrism (decreases after early adolescence, focus on own thoughts, feelings, concerns)
the imaginary audience (everyone’s watching and evaluating you)
implications of Piaget’s theory for education
orderly, sequential development
match development stages (instructions must match student’s developmental stage)
students develop at different rates
cognitive development is active (child must be actively encountering new info in their environment)
critiques of Piaget’s theory
troubles with stages (abilities emerge at different times, development continuous → errors over a long period)
underestimates ability (problem may be with task/instructions not the student)
excludes cultural and social factors
Neo-Piagetians and info processing
update stages by combining his ideas with modern info-processing science (brain maturation)
development of executive function (ex: attention, working memory, planning, problem-solving)
mediated by the frontal, prefrontal cortex → last areas to mature
Vygotsky: sociocultural perspective
1) activities occur in a social and cultural context
2) social interaction is the source of cognitive development
ex: Genie - spent all her time in a single room, had no social interactions from a baby to 12 years old → didn’t develop cognitive abilities despite interventions (missed critical periods)
3) cognitive skills mediated by language; language is the critical skill
Vygotsky: co-construction
mental processes are co-constructed:
individuals interact → jointly construct solution and knowledge
strategy to arrive at solution is social (sharing persectives) and then internalized
learning involves acquisition and internalizatio of cultural tools (ex: cultural tools for problem solving such as calculators and abacus
Vygotsky: language as the cultural tool
1) language to communication with others
2) much of our thought is language-based
3) private speech guides thought and action
emergence of private speech
1) child’s behaviour guided by others
parent to child: “do not spill those on the floor”
2) child guides behaviour of others
child to child: “you no spill”
3) child guides own behaviour
child to self: “no spill”
progression of private speech
1) social communication with self, aloud
2) becomes whispers
3) silent with lip movements
4) internalized as inner speech
may revert to whispering or lip movements if task is difficult
scaffolding
older others provide scaffolding (support, guidance for problem-solving)
co-constructing and internalization is essential for learning from older others
Vygotsky: assisted learning
assisted learning: guided participation
decreasing guidance (scaffolding) as ability develops
goal is for the student to independently complete the task without any teacher help
Vygotsky: learning
1) social activity (depends on support from others)
2) expansion of zone of proximal development (ZPD):
gap between what a learner can do independently and what they can achieve with guidance
3) language (cognitive development and social interaction mediated by language)
early maturing vs late maturing
girls:
early - sexual activity, school achievement, drug and alcohol use, depression, anxiety, eating disorders
late - anxiety about development, fewer problems
boys:
early - social skills, popularity, risk-taking
late - initial difficulties, creative, tolerant, perceptive
issues:
cultural differences, limited mixed results, challenges greater for gender non-conforming/non-binary youth
Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Model
behave and learn within specific contexts
nested ecosystems
relationships reciprocal
the microsystem: immediate relationships and activities
the mesosystem: among elements of the microsystems, affect the individuak
the exosystem: all the systems, even if not direct member
the macrosystem: societal, cultural elements
parenting styles
authoritative parents:
clear, enforced rules
caring, supportive, expectations → high self-esteem, achievement
best outcomes
authoritarian parents:
do as you’re told
no open affection, cold → low self-esteem, low performance, low self-control, hostile
permissive (indulgent parents):
no guidance or discipline
warm, caring
leads to immature, self-centered, impulsive → aggressive
rejecting/neglectful parents:
no discipline, no guidance
cold, unresponsive → low achievement, low social relationships, high aggression, high risky behaviour, insecure, withdrawn
attachment styles
attachment: the strong, enduring emotional bond between infant and caregivers
secure:
explore, easily comforted
needs appropriately met during early infancy and childhood
child feels world is a predictable place → safer
increased adjustment to school, independence, social interactions, achievement (children do much better in educational settings)
insecure:
resistant:
little exploration → cling to caregiver instead
fear, distressed
disorganized (avoidant):
few signs of attachment (don’t react to caregiver leaving)
muted emotions
contradictory reactions
aggression
instrumental: behaviour is to gain access to object/privilege
hostile: to cause harm to another individual
overt - physical (ex: hitting, kicking)
relational - relationships (goal is to harm that person’s social and emotional relationships)
aggressive is learned by family and media
increased by negative state such as frustration, hunger, stress, physical distress, perceived unfairness
bullying
grade 4-8:
86% have seen someone bullied
at least half have been bullied once
20% cyberbullied
grade 7-8 - critical developmental age (bullying as a large impact on victim)
relational bullying:
targets social relationships (social exclusion, rumours)
can be more damaging than overt + victims less likely to report (think it will make situation worse)
can be difficult to detect (teasing common in friends
Erikson’s 8 stages of psychosocial development
each stage has a specific lasting impact that sticks and has a challenge/crisis that the individual is trying to resolve
continuum with 2 extremes (most people end up in middle)
preschool stages:
trust vs mistrust (birth - 1 ½): optimism/trust ←> pessimism/mistrust
autonomy vs shame and doubt (1 ½ - 3): self-confidence/self-control ←> self-doubt/shame
initiative vs guilt (3-6):
if i do this, am I good or bad?
sensitive to modelling
child is gaining new abilities quickly and wants to explore
unruly, irresponsible ←> guilt, low self-esteem (ruled by concerns of everyone else, putting themselves last)
healthiest development is in middle
industry vs inferiority (6-12):
am i competent?
focus of individual’s social life shifts from family → peers (requires acquisition of cultural tools so individual can integrate into peer group)
competence, self-assurance ←> inferiority, low self-esteem
in grades 5 and 6, relationship issues are common
identity vs role confusion (adolescence → late adolescence/early 20s but some may never resolve):
who am i? where am i going?
stable self-concept, identity ←> unstable self-concept, confusion
adolescents may dramatically change things about themselves → for Erikson, this makes perfect sense as trying out different roles to see how well they fit may be required to find identity
identity
sense of self
development more complicated if both dominant culture and one’s own culture are explored
racial/ethnic pride → better mental health, higher achievement, shorter moratorium
development of personal identity
initial stage: identity diffusion
everyone starts here
no decision, not actively exploring aspects of self
moratorium
undecided/in progress
exploring different options and trying out different things
possible endpoints (Marcia):
identity foreclosure:
identity imposed on them
commit to goals, stable sense of self → no further exploration
tend to be rigid, intolerate, dogmatic (their views are absolute), low self-esteem
identity achievement:
made their own choices and now pursing them
healthy and comfortable → sense of self is congruent
could stay at identity diffusion stage:
external locus of control (what’s happening isn’t up to that person)
apathetic (no control → not caring about situation)
very susceptible to peer pressure/social isolation, low self-esteem
self-concept
perspectives on ourselves
cognitive - your self-concept is describing yourself
general and specific (athletic, artistic, etc)
self-esteem
evaluative/emotional reaction to our self-concept
general and specific
high self-esteem not always good:
realistic → achievement and well-being
unrealistically high → aggression/defensive if threatened, competitive, failure is damaging
development of self-concept and self-esteem
school environment:
performance experience (ex: are children getting the right help when they’re unsure of how to do something?)
social interactions (ex: what do peers say? teachers?)
comparison (ex: students comparing marks after tests)
grade 7-8, high school
decreased self-concept/self-esteem, decreased self-efficacy
increased link to appearance (more critical)
peer groups
increasing importance (around age 6, industry vs inferiority)
norms → rules how to dress, talk, look, interact, what to like
cliques: small, friendship-based, member similarity, usually stable social environment, most important in grades 6-9
crowds: loosely organized (ex: jocks, nerds), may/may not interact, association based on stereotypes, most important during early to middle adolescence
intelligence
the ability to acquire and use knowledge
Spearman’s hierarchical model
general intelligence (g): an innate, single overarching factor that underlies all cognitive tasks and performance
specific factors (s): narrow, unique skills tied strictly to individual, specific types of tasks (such as musical or mathematical proficiency)
Cattel-Horn-Carroll theory (CHC)
Three-strata hierarchy:
stratum III (g): a single, general intelligence factor sits at the top of the hierarchy, influencing overall cognitive performance
stratum II (broad abilities): a middle tier containing around 10-16 broad cognitive domains that partition general intelligence into specific mental operations
Cattel-Horn:
fluid intelligence: intelligence as info processing, peaks late adolescence
crystallized intelligence: intelligence as use of acquired knowledge, increases throughout life
stratum I (narrow abilities): the bottom tier containing over 70-80 specific, highly focused skills tied directly to the broad domains
multiple intelligences: Gardner
logical-mathematical: reasoning, abstract thinking, calculations, and patterns
linguistic: effective use of language, reading, writing, and storytelling
visual-spatial: visualizing and mentally manipulating objects in 3D
musical: recognizing and creating rhythm, pitch, tone, and melody
bodily-kinesthetic: physical coordination, movement, and dexterity
interpersonal: understanding others’ emotions, motivations, and feelings
intrapersonal: understanding your own feelings, fears, and motivations
naturalist: identifying and classifying living things and natural patterns
existential: exploring philosophical questions about life, death, and meaning
issues/benefits of Gardener’s model
issues:
many correlated
how is this measured?
may lead to overly tailored lessons
benefits:
students differ so different abilities → different approaches
beyond a single measure of intelligence
Sternberg’s 3 skills theory
defines 3 distinct types of mental abilities or intelligences:
analytic - formal problem solving
creative - adapt, deal with novel problems
practical - everyday problems
intelligence tests
The Binet-Simon Intelligence Test (1905):
the first practical, standardized intelligence test
purpose: identify children who needed extra help or special education, scored mental processes, not just school subjects
mental age: score matches a child’s performance against the average ability of peers at the same age
intelligence quotient (IQ): mental age divided by chronological age, multiplied by 100
Stanford-Binet (1916)
Wechsler (WAIS 1939, WISC 1949)
how heredity impacts IQ scores
clear heritable component - 50-80%
interaction with environment - biological (nutrition, prenatal care), social/educational (school quality, SES, parental encouragement)
reaction range - the genetically determined limits on IQ, while the environment determines where a person falls within that range
emotional intelligence (EI)
important for social and emotional learning (SEL)
incorporates perceiving (most basic), using (fit task at hand), understanding, and managing emotions
creativity
ability to think about a task in a novel way, to generate new ideas
requires:
1) domain-relevant knowledge, skills
2) creativity-relevant processes, work habits
3) intrinsic motivation, fascination with area
convergent thinking: generate one answer, conventional tests
divergent thinking: generate multiple answers
creative thinking:
divergent thinking to generate ideas
convergent thinking to organize and structure those ideas
Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT)
make as many different pictures as you can
scores on:
1) fluency - number
2) flexibility - diversity
3) originality - commonality (an idea is deemed as original if it is generated by <10% of a normative peer group)

learning style and cognitive style
cognitive style: ways of perceiving, organizing, and using info
learning style: characteristic way of learning and studying
no credible evidence that matching instruction to preferred style improves learning outcomes
exceptional students
performance outside expected range, above or below
instruction suitable for majority is inappropriate, special approach is required for these students to reach their potential
inclusion
inclusion:
incorporate exceptional children into standard classes “mainstreaming”
inclusion doesn’t equal full integration, inclusion allows specialized settings
least restriction placement → put student in the most enabling environment (general setting but support as needed)
gifted and talented students
high competence and levels of creativity
commitment/motivation (may only be present in single area)
origins:
intense, sustained practice
early talent/interest
social preferences:
company of adults/older children
may struggle to connect with same-aged classmates → social isolation/playing alone
emotionally mature and stable (may lead to existential depression at young age)
impatient with others, may get frustrated when others can’t grasp concepts with their ease
gifted adults
impatient
workplace alienation
underachievement and burnout if not continuously challenged or overwhelmed by own perfectionism
gifted screening
normally conducted during grades 3 and 4
identified using:
educational assessments
individual IQ tests
content-specific tests
tests of creativity
case study approach
emotional impact of screening: students may experience intense performance pressure, perfectionism, and anxiety due to the “gifted” label
acceleration vs enrichment for gifted students
acceleration:
standard curriculum, accelerated pace
age-mismatch less of a problem than predicted
enrichment:
additional more challenging work
may involve “pullout” programs - remove gifted students from regular classrooms for a few hours each week to work with academic peers and a specialized instructor
no evidence that either method is superior
learning disabilities
one of a number of neurodevelopmental disorders that persistently and significantly has an impact on the ability to learn and use academic and other skills
specific difficulty:
language and reading
mathematics
general difficulties:
organizing info
attention
coordinating behaviour
memory
social skills
lifelong disabilities → early intervention required before student gives up
working with students with learning disabilities
direct instruction:
clear frequently explanation, instructions, guidance
small steps, frequent practice
frequent, immediate feedback
peer support
self-regulated learning
Individual Education Plan (IEP)
a plan for each exceptional student, reviewed and updated yearly, that includes:
educational expectations (specific goals)
special education programs/services provided
progress monitoring methods
transition plan, if appropriate
responsibility: team approach, but the classroom teacher usually makes program-planning decisions and prepares the report card
benefit of identification: access to additional resources
concern: labels may cause stigma or self-fulfilling prophecies
early language development
use over 2000 distinct speech sounds but each language only uses a small subset
early in infancy, babies can distinguish sounds from any language but between 7-14 months, this ability declines as they lose sensitivty to sounds they’re not regularly exposed to → becomes more specialized in native language
learning language
biologically predisposed to acquire language through an innate mental capacity
allows for communication → primary tool for human empathy, culture sharing, and community building
early language development
joint attention:
child and caregiver attend to same object/action
helps with naming/description → aids vocab development and comprehension
child-directed speech (motherese):
simplified structure
exaggerated tone and high pitched
adults, older children
cross-cultural
prespeech
cooing (to 3 months)
making vowel sounds like “'oo” and “ah”
producing wide range of universal phonemes (all human sounds)
babbling (4-6 months)
response to others’ voices and expressions
combining vowels and consonants like
ba-ba” or “ma-ma”
7-11 months
restricting phonemes (narrows down to match native language)
develops speech-like inflections/jargon
language acquisition
10 months: responds to name, babbles, imitates simple sounds and gestures
12-18 months: says first meaningful words, builds small vocab of single words
18-24 months: uses around 50 words, combining words into two-word phrases → telegraphic speech (short, essential word combinations like “want cookie” or “all gone”)
2-3 years: vocab expands to 100-450 words, speaking in 3-4 work sentences
early language development errors
over-extension: applying a single, specific word to a much broader category of objects/actions/concepts
ex: calling all 4-legged animals “doggie”
under-extension: restricting a general word to a single, highly specific context/object
ex: house pet is “dog” but not recognizing other dogs as such
over-regularize: extending regular grammatical rules to irregular words that don’t follow those rules
ex: saying “tooths” instead of teeth
language during school years
3-4 years: 4-5 word stories, basic grammar develops, 1000 words
5 years: tenses (future, past, present), all essential grammar, 1500+ words
6 years: 10,000-20,000 words
language during elementary school
children develop more advanced language skills including:
pronunciation: mastering difficult, later-developing consonant sounds
complex syntax: using words like although and because, beyond simple and and but
vocab: expanding through reading
non-literal language: understanding jokes, riddles, irony, sarcasm, and metaphors
abstract language: learning words for mental concepts and academic ideas, beyond concrete objects
pragmatics
ability to adapt language style and structure based on the social context, listener, and environment
emerges early
culturally specific
metalinguistic awareness
ability to step back from automatic language use and think about, analyze, and evaluate language as an object on its own, separate from its meaning
language as a process
develops beyond age 5
factors influencing reading development in children
reading development depends on:
decoding: connecting spoken sounds (phonemes) to written letters (graphemes)
oral language: vocab, grammar, and understanding spoken stories
home environment:
modelling: seeing parents read for pleasure makes reading seem valuable
access
literacy-related play
benefits of multiple languages
improves cognitive abilities
metalingustic (easier to grasp grammar and build stronger reading/writing skills)
easier time learning additional languages
developing multiple languages
easiest early → brain processes multiple languages in same native region up to age 5
pronunciation decreases with age
prior exposure helps when learning in future
fully bilingual if languages:
learned before age 5 \
child exposed to both languages across diverse environments
exposure is systematic, consistent, and sustained
with a good quality program:
2-3 years basic (social conversation, daily interactions)
6-9 years academic (textbooks, abstract thinking, critical analysis)
profiles of language learners
balanced bilinguals: L1 and L2
monolingual/literate students: L1
monolingual/preliterate students: literate L1, limited spoken L2
limited bilingual students: L1, limited academic L2
heritage language and types of bilingualism
heritage language: a language spoken at home that’s not the dominant societal language; often lost by the 3rd generation as families shift to dominant language
additive bilingualism: learning a second language while maintaining the heritage language
subtractive bilingualism: learning a second language at the expense of the heritage language, which may be replaced
balanced bilingualism: having equal or near-equal fluency and proficiency in both languages
2 approaches to learning English
immersion: instruction in English with max exposure; aims for rapid transition to English-only instruction
most common but students may fall behind in core subjects (ex: math/science) and lose their first language
native-language maintenance/bilingual learning: maintains and teaches the first language, transitioning to English when possible
produces better outcomes but limited by funding, lack of bilingual teachers, and policies favouring English-only instruction