Learn: Liability in sport and Rec uiowa midterm Daniel M

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/131

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:07 PM on 10/11/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

132 Terms

1
New cards

How is law created

1. constitution (federal and states)

2. Statues (federal and states)

3. court decisions (common law)

4. Administrative Agencies

2
New cards

Constitutional Law

Limitation on government authority that protect certain rights of citizens

3
New cards

first amendment

protects freedom

4
New cards

Fourth Amendment

protect the right of citizens to be free from unreasonable search and seizure

5
New cards

Administrative Law

Agencies created to manage and enforce federal laws in specific areas. Agency regulations have force of law

6
New cards

National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)

federal agency with the authority to protect employee's rights to form unions and prevent/ correct unfair labor practices committed by private sector employers and unions

7
New cards

Common Law

law established by court decisions

8
New cards

binding precedent

all courts in the same system at or below the court that issues a decision are bound by the decision

9
New cards

case of first impression

if a court in a different system does not have its own precedent to follow

10
New cards

Persuasive precedent

A decision of another court which is influential but not binding.

11
New cards

typical state court system

1. state supreme court

2. state court appeals

3. special courts. Family and Traffic. District Courts. City courts criminal and civil

12
New cards

Federal Court System

1. U.S supreme court

2. court of appeals

3. administrative agencies

13
New cards

jurisdiction

the authority of a court to hear and decide a case

14
New cards

jurisdiction depends on

1. parties involved

2. issue involved

3. dollar amount involved

4. where events took place

15
New cards

Statutory Law

laws developed and passed by legislative bodies. Only valid in the area governed by legislative body. when there is disagreement over the interpretation of a statutory law, the courts may be asked to resolve the dispute- which creates common law precedent

16
New cards

Plaintiff

One who begins a lawsuit

17
New cards

Defendant

an individual or group being sued or charged with a crime

18
New cards

class action

a procedure by which similarly situated litigants may be heard in a single lawsuit

19
New cards

Statute of Limitations

A federal or state statute setting the maximum time period during which a certain action can be brought or certain rights enforced.

20
New cards

when are motions requested

by a plaintiff or defendant for the court to take an action in the case

21
New cards

motion for summary judgment

facts in the case are undisputed. judge can decided the case with conducting a trial to determine which party's version the of facts is more credible

22
New cards

court decisions

affirmed, reversed or remamded

23
New cards

four sections of a case brief?

facts of the case, issues of the case, the holding and the reasoning

24
New cards

tort

a civil wrong (as opposed to criminal) for which the courts will provide a remedy in the form of damages

25
New cards

intentional torts

assault and battery, defamation are examples

26
New cards

unintentional torts

include negligence

27
New cards

negligence

conduct that falls below the legal standard for protecting others against unreasonable risk of harm. Acts of commission. Acts of omission

28
New cards

what are the four elements necessary to prove negligence?

1. there is a duty

2. breach of duty

3. there are injury or damages

4. proximate cuase/causation

29
New cards

duty

the defendant must have a legal obligation to protect the plaintiff from unreasonable risk of harm

30
New cards

breach of duty

the defendant fails to meet the legal standard of care

31
New cards

injury or damages

there must be injuries or damages

32
New cards

proximate cuase/ causation

the breach of duty must be the reason for the plaintiff's injuries or damages

33
New cards

inherent/special relationship

the duty arises out of the relationship between the parties (coach and high school athlete, health club and patrons, stadium operator and spectators, etc

34
New cards

voluntary assumption

person does not owe a legal duty to another but voluntarily assumes one.

when a person assumes a duty, he now has the obligation to act with an appropriate standard of care

35
New cards

statutory duty

a statute specifies the duty.

legislative body identifies the legal duty owed between parties

36
New cards

ordinary negligence

unintentional breach of a legal duty by the defendant that exposes the plaintiff to an unreasonable risk of injury, which results in damages

37
New cards

ordinary negligence is caused by

1. inadvertent behavior

2. inattention

3. thoughtlessness

4. incompetence

38
New cards

aggravated negligence is

unreasonable conduct that the defendant knew or should have known would create an unreasonable risk of physical harm.

39
New cards

liable

legally responsible

40
New cards

three categories of parties that may be liable in a negligence lawsuit

1. involved employee or service personnel

2. administrative or supervisory personnel

3. corporate entity/employer or governing body

41
New cards

involved employee or service personnel

usually the person who commits the negligent act through direct contact with the plaintiff

42
New cards

administrative or supervisory personnel

usually the person who supervises the negligent employee

43
New cards

administrative or supervisory personnel are usually not liable unless they fail to perform their administrative/supervisory obligations which may include things such as

employ competent staff and release those who aren't

44
New cards

employees and supervisory/ administrative personnel are individual liable for their own negligent conduct, such as

negligent instruction

negligent hiring

negligent supervision

45
New cards

corporate entity/employer or governing body may be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for injury resulting from

the ordinary negligence of an employee. If the employee was acting within the scope of her authority

46
New cards

respondeat superior

let the superior respond. also know as vicarious liablity

47
New cards

independent contractors

negligence by an independent contractor usually does not lead to vicorious liablity for the corporation/owner

48
New cards

Indepedent Contractor

usually paid agreed sum, freedom to work his way

49
New cards

employee contractor

hired, paid set wage, ongoing schedule

50
New cards

Defenses against negligence

elements of negligence

primary assumption of risk

comparative negligence

ultra vires act

statue of limitation

51
New cards

primary assumption of risk

defendant is not liable if plaintiff injures himself while voluntarily exposing himself to a activity with a know and appreciated danger

52
New cards

three required elements for successful defense using the primary assumption of risk

1. the plaintiff was injured by a risk inherent to the sport or activity

2. the plaintiff voluntairily consented to exposure to the risk

3. the plaintiff knew, understood and appreciated the inherent risks of the activity

53
New cards

Assumption of Risk

A defense against negligence that can be used when the plaintiff was aware of a danger and voluntarily assumed the risk of injury from that danger.

54
New cards

Ultra Vires Act

by showing that the employee acted outside the scope of her authority in committing the negligent acts that cuased damages

55
New cards

statue of limitations

if the plaintiff fails to file the lawsuit within the time permitted under state law

56
New cards

comparative fault

when plaintiff and defendant both were negligent (leading to plaintiff's damages), court determines how much of the injury was caused by plaintiff and reduces the defendant's liability by the plaintiff's level of fault

57
New cards

immunity

broad category of defense against tort liability for certain classes of people or entities

58
New cards

Doctrine of sovereign/ governmental immunity

defense for governmental units (federal, state, local)

59
New cards

discretionary acts

acts involving deliberation, planning, decision making, policy setting

60
New cards

Ministerial Acts

acts that do not require independent decision making, such as carrying out order, performing a specific duty, following a schedule to perform operational acts

61
New cards

what could be possible public policy arguments in favor of immunity for government officals?

protection of public (taxpayer) money from paying out damages in lawsuits.

Allowing public officials to make decisions in carrying out their public duties without being burdened by the constant threat of lawsuit against the state

62
New cards

governmental function

where sovereign immunity exists, it usually applies when a state entity is carrying out its governmental duties for the benefit of the general public

63
New cards

proprietary function

where sovereign immunity exists, it may not provide protection if the state entity performs for-profit activities that a private entity could do

64
New cards

volunteer immunity statutes

state laws to protect those who volunteer for non profit or government organizations from negligence lawsuits, if the negligence occurred while preforming duties for the organization

65
New cards

shared responsibility and statutory assumption of risk statutues

state laws offering immunity to providers of certain rec and sport activities if injuries result from inherent risks in the activities and, in some cases, from liability for damages caused by ordinary negligence by the provider

66
New cards

NJ Baseball spectator safety act was an example of?

immunity statutue

67
New cards

recreational user statutes

immunity provided by statute to certain private landowners. These statutes require that the landowner doesn't charge users a feel and the landowner must warn of hazardous situations

68
New cards

recreational user statues, most of the the statues require

the landowner must not charge users a fee.

some statutes require the landowner to warn of ultra-hazardous situations or hidden risks of which the landowner is aware, but many statues require no warning

69
New cards

key categories of documentation

waivers

informed consent agreements

agreements to participate

assumption of risk agreements

70
New cards

waiver

contract, participant gives up right to sue provider if the provider injures the participant through ordinary negligence

71
New cards

the waiver must identify 2 things

1. the parties giving up their rights

2. the parties protected by the agreement

72
New cards

agreements are used to protect defendants form what?

against liability for injuries arising from the inherent risks of an activity

73
New cards

informed consent agreements

protects providers from liability for the risk associated with a program and from liability for battery

74
New cards

agreements to participate

document to make participants aware of risks and acknowledge them. not a contract so minors may sign them

75
New cards

assumption of risk agreements

document to make participants aware of an activity inherent risks and acknowledge the risks. understands the activity and the risk

76
New cards

premises liability key concepts

duty owed to invitee/ licensee/ tresspasser

factors affecting liablity

strategies for protecting an organization from liability for damages occurring on the premises

77
New cards

Premises Liability

the owner or operator of a sport or recreation business owes a duty to keep the premises safe for those who enter

78
New cards

if some is a invitee

owed highest level of protection

are owed the same duty by the landowner

79
New cards

if someone is an licensee

landowner must only warn or protect the licensee from harms the landowner is aware of

80
New cards

trespasser

duty to avoid willful and wanton misconduct and refrain from making the premises more dangerous than the trespasser would ordinarily expect

81
New cards

Attractive Nuisance

landowners may not allow a dangerous condition to exist on the property that can resonably attract children onto the land

82
New cards

foreseeability of the danger

duty is to protect against FORESEEABLE dangers

83
New cards

actual notice and constructive notice

landowner must have actual or constructive notice of the danger in order to be liable for damages suffered by an invitee

84
New cards

Constructive Notice

the landowner should have been aware of the issue

85
New cards

actual notice

landowner actually becomes aware of the issue

86
New cards

constructive notice can be established because either

the dangerous condition existed for a sufficient time that it would have been discovered if the facility operator was paying reasonable attention or

the dangerous condition was part of a pattern of conduct or a recurring incident

87
New cards

open and obvious dangers

land owner is usually not under a duty to protect invitees from open and obvious dangers

88
New cards

keep premises in safe repair

routine maintenance of facility wear and tear and any conditions that could develop into dangers

89
New cards

to satisfy its duty of care we must

keep premises in safe repair

inspect premises to discover both obvious and hidden dangers

remove hazards or wanr them of their presence

anticipate foreseeable issues and take reasonable precautions to protect invitiees

90
New cards

emergency care

medical assistance to an injured person

91
New cards

if emergency care exists the provider must consider the following

emergency planning

staffing

equipment resources

implementation of emergency procedures

92
New cards

charge person

overall responsibility and has specific training for the emergency

93
New cards

call person

calls and meets emergency personnel

94
New cards

Control Person

controlling the scene, keeping those who are not authorized aware

95
New cards

Kleinknecht v. Gettysburg College

several breakdowns in planning for and responding to the duty to provide emergency care

96
New cards

negligent supervision

common charge by plaintiffs in lawsuits against rec and sport providers

97
New cards

general supervision

overseeing individuals/groups involved in activity; no constant scrutiny, but watchfulness

98
New cards

Specific Supervision

constant, continuous supervision, the kind that would be expected for individuals or small groups receiving instruction, in a high-risk activity or using areas that have potential for serious injury (example: new health club member using climbing wall for first time)

99
New cards

transitional supervision

shifting between general and specific supervision depending on the need for instruction, abilities, use of equipment, use of the facility, involvement with others (example: strength coach monitoring all weight room activities then transitioning to specific supervision activities)

100
New cards

supervisor duties

effective planning

proper instruction

warn of risks

provide a safe environment

evaluate physical and mental condition of participants

providing emergency