1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
wellbeing
can be defined as a state of happiness and contentment, with low levels of distress, overall good physical outlook and quality of life
Diener’s model of wellbeing
subjective wellbeing describes people’s cognitive and affective evaluation of their lives, the frequency of positive affect, the level of negative affect and the cognitive evaluation of life satisfaction
affective balance
the balance between positive and negative emotions that an individual experiences in their daily life
affect
the experience and outward expression of emotion
life satisfaction
a cognitive judgemental evaluation of one’s life circumstances and experiences
subjective wellbeing
theorises that life satisfaction and affective balance are related but distinct concepts
factors of well being
(PEPPAS) - Purpose in life, Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive relations with others, Autonomy and Self respect
Stress
the nonspecific response of the body to any demands made upon it
eustress
a positive or beneficial stress response that is perceived as motivational or energising and is associated with situations that are challenging but within an individuality’s coping abilities and resources
distress
a negative or harmful stress response that impedes our ability to perform at an optimal level, is detrimental in nature and generates psychological maladaption
stressor
any stimulus that challenges or threatens, this causing the feeling of stress
internal stressors
psychological
external stressors
environmental, social, cultural
acute duration of a stressor
short term stressor’s which are your bodies immediate response
chronic duration of stressor
long term ongoing demands, pressures or worries
General Adaptation Syndrome, Seyle 1936
the body’s typical response pattern in terms of resistance to stress over time, describes the physiological changes the body automatically goes through to alleviate the impact of a stressor (adaptation)
alarm phase
initial response to a stressor, has two substages: shock and counter shock
shock
features low resistance and momentarily reduces the ability to deal with stressors
counter shock
activation of the sympathetic nervous system to prepare for a fight or flight response, releasing adrenaline and cortisol
resistance stage
if the stressor remains the body enters resistance stage, and will continue to produce cortisol and adrenaline, during this stage the body is prepared to deal with the stressor, the immune system is suppressed and the body is more susceptible to ‘wear and tear’
exhaustion stage
where the body’s physical, emotional and mental resources are depleted and the body no longer has the strength to fight the stressor
strengths of GAS model
identifies the biological processes associated with stress and was the first to highlight that stress has a major impact on the immune system
limitations of the GAS model
assumes the stress response is biologically uniform, and places too much emphasis on the biology of stress - does not account for psychological factors
Stress as a stimulus theory - Holmes and Rahe, 1967
viewed stress as a significant life event or change that demands a response, adjustment or adaptation
Social readjustment
measures the intensity and length of time necessary to accomodate to a life event, regardless of the event’s desirability
social readjustment rating scale (Holmes and Rahe, 1967)
consists of 43 common life events, scored according to the estimated degree of personal readjustment they would demand, by adding up the Life Changing Units the likelihood of experiencing a major health breakdown in the next two years is calculated
strengths of SRRS
Consistent cross culturally, helped raise awareness of the impact of major life events on stress and contributed to an understanding of mind-body connection
limitations of SRRS
limited scope, subjectivity/bias
Transactional Theory of Stress (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984)
presents stress as a product of a transaction between an individual and their complex external environment and the stress response as a subjective experience depending on an individual’s cognitive appraisal of the stressor
appraisal
a mental evaluation/interpretation of a situation where you judge how important something is and whether it matches your goals
coping
the cognitive and behavioural efforts made by individuals to manage the demands of a stressful situation
primary appraisal
can be benign (postive), irrelevant, or stressful - harm/loss, threat, challenge
secondary appraisal
where we evaluate our coping options and resources and either adequate or inadequate