1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Employee Selection/Recruitment
Selection approach
Training approach
Planning —> Acquiring applicants —> Selecting applicants —> Hiring
Selection Approach
Less expensive
Letting go employees who are not showing good performance and finding new ones (Finding better employees)
Training Approach
Use an internal source and offer them training to try to make them better so they have a better fit
Steps in Selecting Employees
Job analysis
Selection of testing methods
Test validation
Recruitment
Screening
Testing
Selecting
Hiring/rejecting
Planning and Recruitment
Anticipating needs for human resources
Expansion vs replacements
Recruitment
Advertising
Employee referral
Employment agencies
School recruiters
Walk-ins
The web
In competitive jobs, many companies fight for the same employees
Inside sources (i.e., referrals and transfers) perform better
The web has made recruiting more efficient
Recruitment Methods: Ads, Agencies, and Recruiters
Media advertisements
Recruiters
Employment agencies and search firms
Employee referrals
Direct mail
Writing recruitment ads
Media Advertisements
Newspaper ads
Electronic media
Recruiters
Campus recruiters
Outside recruiters
Employement Agencies and Search Firms
Employment agencies
Executive search firms
Public employement agencies
Writing Recruitment Ads
Realistic information
Detailed description of the job and organization
Selection process information
Recruitment Methods: Online and In Person
Internet
Employer-based websites
Job boards
Social media
Job marketplace
Job fairs
Selecting Employees
Hope to recruit numerous good applicants
More selective an organization can be, greater change of hiring successful employees
Criterion - definition of good employee performance on that specific position
Predictor - anything that relates to the criterion
Determine if predictor relates to criterion by using a validation study
Criterion and Predictor Examples
Sales representative
C: Actual sales rates
P: Sales aptitude test
Software developer
C: coding quality/efficiency, successful project completion
P: emotional intelligence test, customer interaction roleplay
Conducting a Validation Study
Conduct a job analysis
Specify job performance criteria
Choose predictors (i.e., psychological tests or interviews)
Validate the predictors (concurrent vs predictive)
Cross-validate (validity generalization
Using Predictor Information for Selection
Multiple hurdles
Must pass each criterion cutoff to be considered
Can save expensive tests for only best applicants
Regression approach
Uses scores from each predictor in an equation to estimate criterion
Low score in one area can be outweighed by other high scores in another
Combination of hurdles and regression
Alternatives to validation studies
i.e., previously validated selection tools
Getting Applicants to Accept Offers
Selection is of little value if employees do not accept and keep job offers
Positive recruitment process
Comparable salary benefits
Cafeteria benefits
Realistic Job Preview (RJP)
Realistic Job Preview (RJP)
Give applicants accurate information about job and organization
Reduce number of acceptances
Increase job performance and job satisfaction
Establishing the Usefulness of a Selection Device
Utility: the degree to which a selection device improves the quality of a personnel system, above and beyond what would have occurred had the instrument not been used
Selection Works Best When:
You have many job openings
You have many more applicants than openings
You have a valid test
The job in question has a high salary
The job is not easily performed or easily trained
Utility
Value of selection system to the organization
Utility analysis: Taylor-Russell Tables
Valid predictors increase true positives and reduce false positives
Must determine if benefits to the organization outweigh the costs of the selection devices
Utility Analysis: Taylor-Russell Tables
Utility is maximized by
Base rate - (successful employees + total employees)
Selection ratio (hired applicants + applicants)
Validity of selection device - should be high
Using the Utility Formula and Tables
A hypothetical employment situation:
You have 500 applicants and 250 job openings. The validity of your proposed test, the Reilly Statistical Logic Test is .40, and the test costs $10 per applicant to administer.
You have 1000 current employees, 800 of whom are satisfactory.
The salary for the position is $70,000, and the typical employee stays for four years. Currently, you are using the Tribble Math test with a validity of .30, which costs $15 per applicant to administer.
On the basis of the Taylor-Russell Tables, what percentage of future employees will be successful?
Answer
Selection Ratio 250 ÷ 500 = 0.50
Base rate 800 ÷ 1000 = 0.80
Validity 0.40
% of future successful employees 89%
Proportion of Correct Decisions: Method
Proportion of Correct Decisions with Test
Baseline of Correct Decisions
Proportion of Correct Decisions with Test
(Correct rejections + correct acceptances) ÷ Total employees
Quadrant IV Quadrant II Quadrants I + II + III + IV
Baseline of Correct Decisions
Successful employees ÷ Total employees
Quadrants I + II Quadrants I + II + III + IV
Proportion of Correct Decisions: Computed
Proportion of correct decisions with test
(10 + 11) ÷ (5 + 10 + 4 + 11)
Quad. II Quad IV Quadrants I + II + III + IV
= 21 ÷ 30 = 0.70
Baseline of correct decisions
5 + 10 ÷ 5 + 10 + 4 + 11
Quad. I + II Quad. I + II + III + IV
= 15 ÷ 30 = 0.50
International Differences in Selection
Personality and cognitive ability tests are the most popular
Less valid procedures used more widely
Laws and regulations
Laws shape selection in most developed countries
Unions in many European countries