Fair Trials and the Rule of Law

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards defining fundamental legal principles, trial procedures, rules of evidence, and key terms associated with fair trials and the Rule of Law.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Rule of Law

The overarching legal principle that no one is above the law, laws are known and accessible, and all people and government agencies are bound by and held accountable to publicly established laws.

2
New cards

Presumption of Innocence

A foundational fair-trial principle requiring that a person accused of a criminal offence is treated as innocent until their guilt is proven by the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt.

3
New cards

Onus of Proof

The legal burden placed on the prosecution in a criminal proceeding to present sufficient evidence to prove the accused person's guilt.

4
New cards

Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The high legal standard of proof required in criminal cases, meaning the evidence must establish the defendant's guilt so clearly that no reasonable alternative explanation exists.

5
New cards

Judicial Independence

The constitutional requirement that judges remain separate and protected from political, governmental, media, or popular pressure, deciding cases impartially based strictly on the law and evidence.

6
New cards

Recusal

The formal act of a judge stepping aside or withdrawing from presiding over a legal proceeding due to a conflict of interest, personal connection, or potential bias.

7
New cards

Public Hearing

A court proceeding open to public attendance and media scrutiny to ensure transparency and open justice, which may only be restricted in exceptional circumstances to safeguard privacy or safety.

8
New cards

Empanelling

The formal procedural process of selecting, challenging, and swearing in members of a jury from a larger jury pool to hear and determine a trial.

9
New cards

Peremptory Challenge

The formal objection raised by the prosecution or defence during jury selection to dismiss a prospective juror without being required to provide a reason.

10
New cards

Challenge for Cause

A formal objection made during jury selection to exclude a prospective juror based on a specific, justifiable reason, such as demonstrable bias or lack of legal eligibility.

11
New cards

Deliberation

The confidential and collaborative discussion among jury members in private to carefully examine the evidence presented in court before delivering a verdict.

12
New cards

Direct Evidence

Evidence provided by a witness who personally observed, heard, or perceived an event firsthand, such as an eyewitness testifying that they watched a specific act occur.

13
New cards

Circumstantial Evidence

Indirect evidence that relies on an inference or logical deduction to connect it to a factual conclusion, such as vehicle tire tracks, departure times, or footprints leading away from a scene.

14
New cards

Hearsay Evidence

Secondhand information or out-of-court statements repeated by a person who did not witness the event personally, such as repeating a rumour from an online group chat, which is generally inadmissible or unreliable.

15
New cards

Expert Opinion

Specialized evidence or testimony given by a qualified professional in their designated field of expertise, such as a forensic scientist conducting a scientific fingerprint comparison.

16
New cards

Trial by Media

The widespread reporting, commentary, or prejudice created by news outlets and social media that publicly judges or influences perceptions of an accused person before a court verdict.

17
New cards

Confirmation Bias

The psychological tendency to selectively seek, favour, and interpret information in a manner that confirms preexisting assumptions or beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence.

18
New cards

Change Blindness

A perceptual phenomenon where an observer fails to notice significant visual changes in an environment or subject, potentially undermining the accuracy of eyewitness identification.

19
New cards

Contempt of Court

Any conduct that directly disobeys a lawful judicial order, disrupts court proceedings, or interferes with the proper administration of justice.

20
New cards

Court Delay

Prolonged and unnecessary postponement in bringing a case to trial, which threatens the right to a prompt trial and creates negative impacts for the accused, victims, and witnesses.

21
New cards

Victim Impact Statement

A written or oral account provided to the court explaining the injury, loss, or emotional trauma suffered by a victim, used exclusively during sentencing after a conviction is secured.

22
New cards

Mitigating Factors

Relevant facts or individual circumstances presented to the court that do not excuse guilt but may be considered by a judge to reduce the severity of a sentence.

23
New cards

Appeal

A legal process by which a party requests a higher court to review, correct, or overturn the ruling or verdict of a lower court due to an alleged error of law or procedure.

24
New cards

Separation of Powers

The division of government responsibilities into three distinct branches: the legislature (makes laws), the executive (administers laws), and the judiciary (interprets and applies laws).

25
New cards

Dietrich v The Queen (1992)

The landmark High Court of Australia case establishing that while there is no absolute entitlement to state-funded counsel, an indigent person facing serious charges is entitled to a stay of proceedings if lack of representation would cause an unfair trial.

26
New cards

Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 (Qld)

The statutory framework in Queensland that sets out, clarifies, and restricts the powers and procedural duties of police officers during investigations.