OAM 330 Midterm 2: Negotiations and Groups/Teams

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/37

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

38 Terms

1
New cards

Negotiations involving one issue and are a fixed-pie (direct win/lose or zero-sum)

Distributive negotiation

2
New cards

BATNA - represents best available outcome if you walked away from a negotiation

Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement

3
New cards

Why is BATNA the biggest source of leverage in a negotation?

The stronger it is, the easier it is to get outcome

4
New cards

Should you reveal a strong BATNA? What about a weak one?

Hint at a strong one, never reveal a weak one

5
New cards

The highest or lowest point a party is willing to go to in a negotation

Reservation price

6
New cards

When should you clearly define your reservation price?

Before the negotiation

7
New cards

Should you ever reveal your reservation price?

No

8
New cards

How are BATNA and reservation price related?

BATNA helps determine reservation price, and reservation price should be close to BATNA

9
New cards

Why aren’t BATNA and reservation price just exactly the same thing?

Personal factors go into reservation price

10
New cards

Your ideal outcome in a negotation - determined by trying to get as close as the other party’s reservation price

Target price

11
New cards

ZOPA - represents bargaining zone between a buyer’s reservation price (highest they’d go) and a seller’s reservation price (lowest they’d go)

Zone of Possible Agreement

12
New cards

When does a ZOPA not exist?

If a buyer’s reservation price is less than a seller’s reservation price

13
New cards

Tendency to make an agreement in a negotation, even if the outcome is disadvantageous

Agreement bias

14
New cards

What are 3 reasons agreement bias can happen?

  1. Not identifying reservation price

  2. Sunk cost fallacy

  3. Maintaining image


15
New cards

Should you make the first offer in a negotation, and because of what bias?

Yes, because of anchoring bias

16
New cards

When should you ever not make the first offer in a negotation?

If you have no idea what the other party’s BATNA is (or to maintain relationships)

17
New cards

What is a good strategy to attain a desirable outcome during a negotation?

Get the other party to focus on their reservation price

18
New cards

Issues where both parties want the same outcome

Compatible issues

19
New cards

Negotations involving multiple issues and that are variable-sum, where both parties can expand the pie and create more or less value

Integrative negotations

20
New cards

When all of the issues in a negotation have been allocated to create the most benefit for all possible (maximizing the pie)

Pareto-efficiency

21
New cards

Why are pareto-efficiency and pareto-equity not the same thing?

Trying to maximize total value can lead you vulnerable to another party claiming more of that value

22
New cards

What kind of info can you share in integrative negotations?

Share which issues matter but not how much, and avoid strong preferences

23
New cards

For integrative negotations, is it better to go issue-by-issue or negotiate pre-meditated package deals?

Package deals create a sense of flexibility

24
New cards

Tendency for groups to only focus on shared information rather than individual insights

Common knowledge effect

25
New cards

Why does the common knowledge effect occur?

Consistency and social comparisons

26
New cards

When the desire to maintain group cohesiveness influences the decision making process

Groupthink

27
New cards

What are some causes of groupthink?

Group isolation, demanded obedience, high stress

28
New cards

How can groupthink be prevented?

Encourage different opinions, have systematic procedures

29
New cards

People in groups tend to agree, so group discussions lead to more extreme opinions

Group polarization

30
New cards

What are the 3 causes of group polarization?

  1. Persuasive arguments

  2. Social comparison

  3. Outgroup perception


31
New cards

Belief by team members on whether it’s okay to take risks

Psychological safety

32
New cards

What is one strategy to achieve high psychological safety from the Google article?

Allowing everyone to share without fear of repercussion

33
New cards

Idea that the presence of others increases the dominant response, making easy tasks better and harder tasks worse

Social facilitation

34
New cards

What happened in the fishing reel study (social facilitation)?

People worked faster in groups

35
New cards

What happened in the cockroach study (social facilitation)?

Cockroaches beat the easy maze faster with spectators, but took longer for the hard maze

36
New cards

Idea that the presence of others can decrease the dominant response in certain situations, because each individual is not held accountable as much

Social loafing

37
New cards

What happened in the pulling the rope study (social loafing)?

People pulled harder when they thought they were alone

38
New cards

When is social loafing less likely to occur?

Intrinsic motivation, with friends, collectivistic culture