1/31
Human Rights
Human rights
Basic freedoms or standards that promote and uphold the dignity of all people, and re guaranteed by a moral sense of duty or by the law
Humans’ rights commission
a set of moral and legal guidelines that promote and protect a recognition of our values, our identity and ability to an adequate standard of living
How human rights have developed
in 1901 woman couldn’t vote and it was changed in 1902
First Nations weren’t considered Australian until 1967
same sex marriage not recognised till 2017
International treaty
Legally binding agreement between countries or intergovernmental organisations, in which they undertake to follow the obligations set out the agreement and include them in their own local laws
What must happen for Australia to be bound by a treaty?
they must specifically pass statute law to approve and adopt the various rights outlined in the international treaty
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
An international document that outlines basic rights and fundamental freedoms to which all humans are entitled
Rights from Universal Declaration of Human Rights
All people are born free and equal in dignity and rights
everyone is entitled to the same rights and freedoms
no one should be subject to slavery, torture or cruel or degrading treatment or punishment
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person
Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against woman
Aims to protect human rights of woman, promotes implementation of laws and systems that ensure woman are equal under the law and not discriminated against on the basis of their sex
Three main ways rights are protected in Aus
- Statute law
- Common law
- The Australian Institution
Charter of Human Rights
Document that sets out the basic human rights and/or freedoms of the citizens in a particular state or territory
Human rights outlined in the charter
Right to life
Right to protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Freedom of movement
Freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief
Right to take part in public life
General limitation clause
allows public authorities to restrict human rights in situations where it is reasonable and justified in order to uphold a free and democratic society
Strengths of protecting human rights though statute law
- Parliament can create new legislation and amend existing statutes to incorporate further human rights, particularly as the views and values of the community change
- Statutes are often detailed and precise and protect human rights specifically rather than being implied
- Human rights contained in statutes are generally enforceable and need to be recognised by government organisations
- Parliament has the ability to pass laws quickly if there is a need to promptly protect additional human rights
Weaknesses of protecting human rights though statute law
As the supreme-making body, parliament can amend statutes to restrict or cancel existing human rights
Parliament can include exemptions, limitations or restrictions in statutes, so protected human rights are not always absolute
statutes don’t always enable a person to be awarded anything if their human rights are breached
human rights protected by statute law aren’t as well protected as human rights contained in a constitution
Common law
is a law that has been established and developed over the years through decisions made by judges i state and federal courts
common law rights
freedoms established by judges when deciding on a case
Rights protected by common law
right to silence
right to fair trial
right to legal representation
right to transgender people to marry
Ultra vires
Latin term meaning ‘beyond the powers’, a law made beyond the powers of parliament
Codification
to collect all law on one topic together into a single statute
Abrogation
to abolish or cancel law
How Australian constitution protects human rights
through express rights
through implied rights
Express rights
Are rights stated in the Australian Constitution, they are entrenched, meaning they can only be changed by a referendum
implied rights
rights that are not expressly stated in the Australian Constitution but are considered to exist through interpretation by the High Court
Universal declaration of human rights (1984)
to respect and promote the achievement of the basic human rights and freedoms outlined in thr UDHR
UDHR broadly sets out
the right of all people to take part in the government of their country, either directly or through freely chosen representatives
the will of the people shall be ‘the basis of the authority of the government’, and that the people will have the opportunity to express these wishes through the right to vote
people disqualified from voting
people who are incapable of understanding the nature and significance of voting due to being of ‘unsound mind’
people found guilty of the criminal offence of treason or treachery
person who is serving a prison sentence of three or more years
Laws that govern and protect the right to vote in Australia
Sections 7 and 24- requires houses of parliament to be ‘directly chosen by the people’
The High Court has been required to interpret the meaning to resolve cases
Reform
making changes/improvements to an existing system to make it more effective, fair or efficient
Conflicting issues and possible reform- Lowering the voting age
Options- not compulsory and no fines but compulsory voting
Human Rights Law Centre- support lowering it, allowing young people an opportunity to express their views and whom governs the country
What happened in the Roach vs Electoral Commissioner (2007)
They determined whether an Act of Parliament that banned prisoners from voting breached the Australian Constitution
In 2006 an Amendment changed it, allowing no one imprisoned to vote
Roach challenged the constitutional validity of both Acts in the High Court with assistance of the Australian Rights Commissioner
In 2007 Act was declared unconstitutional and invalid
Constitutional validity
refers to whether a law is legally valid under the Australian Constitution
Roach vs Electoral Commissioner
In simple terms the High Court ruled that the principal of representative government protects the right of the people to choose members of the Commonwealth Parliament