1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
How is a group defined?
Social sciences → “two or more individuals who percieve themselves as part of a unit and who influence each other and are independent”
Social identity → “defined in terms of those who identify as members of the group”
Why do people join groups?
Social reasons
Closeness
Support
Achievement of personal objectives
Achievement of goals
Common-identity groups
Groups where people share a category
Common-bond groups
Groups where people share friendships
Cohesiveness
Barrett (2017) → “the strength of the bonds that hold members together and keep them as a group”
Entitativity
The degree to which people outside of the group can recognise members as being part of the group
Prototypical leader
Someone who follows group norms very closely.
More trusted, persuasive, perceived as more charismatic and effective
Zajonc’s theory of social facilitation (1965)
Suggests the presence of other people leads to an increase in arousal, meaning a dominant response could either be enhanced or impaired performance, depending on how well-practiced the dominant response is
Co-action effect
Someone doing the same action/competing against you.
Audience effect
Passive observers
What theories explain social facilitation effects?
Evaluation apprehension model
Distraction and conflict theory
Explicit monitoring theory
Social loafing theory
What is the evaluation apprehension model?
Suggests the worry about performance is what affects performance
What is the distraction and conflict theory?
Suggests distraction increases arousal, due to conflict of paying attention to audience vs. paying attention to task
Explicit monitoring theory
Suggests bad performance comes from consciously monitoring movements which are usually automatic
What is social loafing theory?
Suggests the presence of others can decrease performance on group tasks as when more people join, less individual effort is required
Deindividuation
A psychological state when people become so immersed in the group they lose self-awareness and responsibility
What factors contribute to deindividuation?
Anonymity
Low risk of accountability or consequences
Increased arousal
Alcohol and drugs
Effects of social integration on health
Social integration has shown a greater effect on prolonging lifespan than behaviours such as reducing BMI, flu vaccinations, less alcohol and quitting smoking.
Social identity theory
We incorporate groups into our identity or sense of self
We show strong preferences for any group we belong to
Minimal groups paradigm demonstrates strength of these effects
Behavioural explanations for effects of group membership on health
Spouses tend to monitor/influence health (Lillard & Waite, 1955)
Group norms that promote healthy behaviours
Psychosocial explanations for effects of group membership on health
Social support reduces stress
Being a member of a group leads to a greater sense of personal control, which leads to healthier behaviours
Physiological explanations for effects of group membership on health
Supportive interactions improve cardiovascular and immune functions
Mediation effects
The portion of an exposure’s total effect on an outcome, transmitted through an intermediate variable known as the mediator
Mediation effects for groups and mental health
Cruwys, South, Greenaway & Haslam (2015)
Lack of identification with groups → Negative self-attributions → Depression
McIntyre, Wickham, Barr & Bentall (2017)
Lack of identification with groups → Low self-esteem → Paranoia & depression

Stress-buffering hypothesis (Elahi, McIntyre et al., 2018)
High neighbourhood identity has a mediative effect on self-esteem from financial stress, which in turn results in better mental health.
Examples of effects of social integration on mental health
People from African & African-Caribbean backgrounds
Strong British identity + positive contact with white Britons = Lower paranoia
Strong British identity + negative contact with white Britons = Higher paranoia
Suggests effects of social factors and types of identity
Individuals in drug programmes who identify as ‘recoverees’ have higher rates of recovery than those who identify as ‘substance users
What are different types of group decision making?
Brainstorming
Minority influence
Leadership
Group think
Faulty thinking in groups that means its more important the group agrees than that the group makes a good decision → desire for harmony or conformity
Group polarisation
Tendency for groups of like-minded people to adopt more extreme positions than the attitudes and actions of individual group members
Brainstorming
Very little evidence of effectiveness due to:
Evaluation apprehension - concern about criticism
Social loafing
Unknown standard of effort
Production blocking - competitivity to have ideas heard interferes with producing good ideas
Minority influence
When a numerical minority changes the attitudes and beliefs of the majority. Achieved through:
Consistency
Confidence
Appearing unbiased
Resisting social pressure
Transactional leadership
Motivates through clear expectations, using rewards and corrective actions
Transformational leadership
Able to inspire and motivate through shared vision and encouragement
Laissez-faire leadership
Hands-off approach, provides minimal direction and allows individual decision making
Social identity leadership
Leaser builds and represents shared ‘us’ as a group, uses group identity to motivate and unite followers