1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Civil liberties
protections from improper government action
either guaranteed explicitly by constitution (3rd amendment)
or determined by courts to be implied by constitution (right to privacy)
civil liberties vs civil rights
civil rights—> right to participate/do something for you individually ie. vote
equal treatment BY the government
civil liberties—>protects you from government inflicting harm on you
protection FROM the gov
hamiltons views towards BOR
hamilton said constitution didn’t need to say what the government can’t do because it should already be implied that if constitution doesnt say the government can do something its not allowed
he was wrong
Barron v Baltimore (1833)
debate on whether BOR applies to staets
property dispute, 5th amendment says that private property can’t be taken for public use without just compensation
SCOTUS ruled that BOR only limits what congress can do, not state governments
14th amendment—>no state can make or enforce law that shortens privileges or immunities of citizens
baltimore won
Griswold v connecticut
rights explicitly expressed in BOR also implicitly carry a right to privacy
increased civil liberties
trustee model
representative should vote for national interest even if it disagrees with majority in their district
delegate model
representative should reflect preferences of district even if it votes against broader national interest
house of representatives is more of a delegate model because the terms are only two years—>reelected more frequently—>have to pursuade people in area to vote for them
sociological and agency representation
principal -agent relationship
when one person (agent) acts on behalf of another (principal)
when principal wants something done, they delegate it to agent
voters=principal
voters delegate authority to officials, senators, etc.
question of how doest the principal make sure the agent does the thing they want them to do
sociological representation and agency representation (both delegate)
sociological representation (descriptive representation)
question: how do we best ensure that agents (reps and senators in congress) will do what principals (voters) want?
first theory (delegate model): sociological rep
someone who is like you is better at representing you
theory that agents (congressmen) are more likely to represent thier principals (constituents) if the agents are more like thier principals when it comes to socioeconomic status, religion, ethnicity, etc.
hard for congress to be representative of everyone
lots of congress dont want to truly state religious affiliations to relate better to constituents
agency representation
second thoery for question of how congress will do waht voter want
substantive representation
theory that what makes you an effective agent is that you can be fired
congress person being fired=losing reelection
DELEGATE MODEL OF REP
constitutional powers of congress
necessary and proper clause
congress has implied powers to carry out explicit powers
legislative process is mostly not explicitly stated in constitution
gerrymandering
strategic manipulation of electoral district boundaries to give political party/group unfair advantage
state legislatures draw boundaries
symbolic representation
when representatives represent their constituents values/beliefs/backgrounds
pocket veto
president did not officially veto, but president never signed and congress adjourned so it didn't get passed
logrolling
legislator agreeing to vote/support each others preferred bills or amendments for mutual benefit
differences between house and senate
House:
rep based on population
elections every 2 years
thus directly and rapidly reflects citizens’ preferences
centralized power
procedures governed overwhelmingly by formal rules
limitations on debates
majority party generally gets what it wants
House:
two senators per state
elections every 6 years (staggered)
less subjected to rapid shifts in public opinion
power evenly distributed
formal rules are important but personal relationships also are crucial to passing legislation
no required limitations on debate (need cloture vote of 60)
minority party very powerful
expressed powers
explicit powers given to federal gov by US constitution
implied powers
delegated powers
the powers given to the executive by congress
ex.. creating new federal agency
department of homeland security in 2002
most open: congress grants broad powers to acheive some outcome w/o guidance
partially open: relatively precise laws, agencies fill in details by making rules
closed: law is precise and complete (ie. income tax laws/tax brackets)
inherent/implicit powers
a power not derived from another power, either due to sovereignty or a loose interpretation of the constitution
merti based civil servants
bureaucrats—>hired based on performance and qualifications rather than spoils system
mccolloch vs maryland
congress has implied powers to carry out explicitly stated powers
necessary and proper clause—>cognress possess powers not explicitly written in constitution
mccolloch: cashier of baltimore branch of national bank
Maryland: passed law to tax any bank operating in state not chartered by maryland
mccolloch refused to pay tax
MCCOLLOCH WON
marbury vs madison
beginning of judicial review
adams (presdient) appoints a bunch of justices in final days in office
the appointments aren’t delivered by Marshall
marbury wants his appointment to become a judge, but new president, jefferson, doesnt want to do it
If marshall sides with marbury, jefferson will ignore it
if marshall sides with jefferson, it will look like he is sucking up
ruling for either side will hurt the legitimacy of supreme court
marshall rules with jeffereson, saying that judiciary act of 1789 that gave courts power to make officials do their job was unconstitutional because congress doesnt have authority to give courts that power
savage
amicus brief
“friend of the court”
argues the court should or shouldnt take up a case from someone unrelated to the case
can also give input on how they should rule
effects on supreme court ruling
stare decisis
legal principle of deferring to the precedents established by past decisions
executive order
a directive to a federal agency establishing new policies or indicating how an existing policy is to be carried out
red tape
writ of mandamus
14th amendment
says no state can make or enforce a law that shortens priveledges or immunities of citizens
applying BOR into state and local governments by incorporating rights into 14th amendment
habeas corpus
you cannot hold poeple wihtout reasonable suspicion, except in cases of rebellion or invasion
article 1, section 9
9th amendment
rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people
no ex de facto law shall be passed
article 1, section 9
cant be punished for an action you did before it was illegal
steps of a bill to law
introduced to congress and assigned to a committee
usually then referred to subcommittee
bill goes through “markup”/amendment process
repeat step three in the larger committee
in the house it goes to rules committee, in senate directly to the floor
this usually means the majority party in the house gets to decide whether a bill is voted on at all
conference committee to reconcile differences in house and senate versions of bill
president signs or vetoes
agenda control
control over set of choices available to others
Bias against action
wayyy easier to kill a bill that to pass one
caused by large number of veto players and veto points and agenda control ( speaker of house party affiliations)
two step process in each chamber
committee with jurisdiction authorizes spending
appropriations committee appropriates the spending
each of these must pass in house and senate
President head of
government and head of state
this is different from other countries
parliamentary systems: ex. UK head of gov is prime minister and head of state is royal famliy
Presidential powers
commander in chief
pardon power
forgives or reduces punishment for criminals
appointments of ambassadors, secretaries of federal agencies, and supreme court justices
take care that laws be executed
convene and adjourn congress
sign or veto bills
Modern presidency
executive branch expanded as bureaucracy grew since there were more policies to be administered
president has become the dominant legislative actor
bureaucracy
a complex structure of positions, tasks, and rules in which individuals have specific responsibilities and work within a hierarchy of authority
bureaucracies implement laws or policies, and are part of the delegated powers
hierarchy
specialization
impartiality
explicit rules
merit
regulation
written by an agency
inspired by finding ambiguity in the law
interest groups submit comments seeking changes
can be blocked or changed by an interest group or by a resolution passed by congress
has the binding force of law
bureaucracy relationship with congress and president
bureaucracy is agent, congress and president are principals
funding (and existence) depends on congress
may be changing due to dismantling of USAID
for now they largely report to congressional committees are are audited by congress
president controls bureaucracy mainly through appointments
and through exec orders
Bureaucrats incentives
greater authority and autonomy
to do good
job security ( and advancement)
unlikely to boost personally from increasing efficiency or effectiveness
would be punished if an innovation created problems, so they dont try new things
merit based civil servants
created by pendleton act
beneftis:
no spoil system
expertise is developed
drawbacks
long-serving civil servants absorb culture of agency
lack of turnover decreases responsiveness to citizens and elected officials
long serving civil servants are better at hiding information
agency capture
when the industry that an agency regulates gains control of agency
POV someone working for an oil company gets a job in EPA
Iron triangle
existing between agency, industry, and congress
congress wants interest group support so they can be reelected
bureaucracy wants continued funding (and existence) from congress
interest groups (generally) want less regulations
Result: bureaucracy often turns to interest groups to save them
supremacy clause
federal law is superior to state law if it is constitutional, the constitution is the supreme law of land
6 tools for ruling (scalia and breyer discussion)
text
history of writing that text
tradition (what the text meant at the time)
precendent (past decisions)
purpose of the law
consequences
breyer: you should focus on 5 and 6 and conservatives only use the first four
Scalia: limitations in the text matter and that assuming the purpose ignores the limitations
legislation
written/introduced by senate or congressperson
inspired by anything, not violating constitution
altered in committee
many players in congress who can veto or influence it
has binding force of law, often too vague for “binding force” to be enforceable