1/124
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Organizational behavior
A field of study devoted to understanding, explaining, and ultimately improving human behavior in organizations
Does OB matter? (Empirical evidence)
decrease in turnover, increase in profits
Rule of one-eighth
1/2 of organizations won't believe the connection between how they manage their people and the profits they earn
**1/2 of those who do see the connection will try to make only a single change to solve their problems
****1/2 of the firms making comprehensive changes do not persist with their practices long enough to actually derive economic benefits
Methods of knowing
Experience
Intuition
Authority
Science
Descriptive science
what do people do?
Interpretive science
how and why does it happen?
Prescriptive science
what should people do, and how can we make it happen?
Model of individual behavior

Personality traits
Habitual pattern of cognition, affect, behavior
Enduring: Stable over time
Implications of personality
Implications for both ability and motivation
Personality trait continuum
Each trait lies on a continuum
*We can describe people has being low, average, or high on different personality dimensions
*Many people fall in the middle
Factors shaping our personality
Heredity (Nature) + Environment (Nurture)
Born with predispositions, then shaped by our environment
"Big 5" Personality Dimensions
OCEAN
Openness to new experiences
Conscientiousness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism
Openness
*how easy to judge?
BROAD-MINDEDNESS
Moderately easy to judge
costs/benefits of openness
Benefits:
Originality
Diversity of interests
Breadth of experiences
Costs:
Losing touch with reality
Losing sight of core values
6 facets of openness
Imagination
Artistic interest
Emotionality
Adventurousness
Intellectual curiosity
Liberalism
Conscientousness
*how easy to judge?
DEPENDABILITY
Moderately easy to judge
costs/benefits of conscientiousness
Benefits:
More likely to set, pursue, and achieve goals
Greater attention, dedication, vigilance
Less likely to make mistakes and cause accidents
High integrity
Generally perform at higher levels in the workplace
Costs:
Less likely to be flexible and creative
More likely to blindly follow rules
More likely to be irritated by less conscientious people
6 facets of conscientiousness
Competence
Orderliness
Dutifulness
Achievement striving
Self-discipline
Deliberation/Cautiousness
Extraversion
*how easy to judge?
Sociability and sensitivity to stimulation
Easiest to judge
costs/benefits of extraversion
Benefits:
Comfort in social situations
Broad network of relationships
Positive emotions
More likely to become leaders
Costs:
Impulsivity
Reliance on external stimulation
Driving introverts crazy - When does this matter at work?
Trouble focusing
6 facets of extraversion
Friendliness
Gregariousness
Assertiveness
Activity level
Excitement-seeking
Cheerfulness
Agreeableness
*how easy to judge?
Prosocial orientation
Difficult to judge
costs/benefits of agreeableness
Benefits:
Favorable image
Getting along with others
Health
Costs:
Being taken advantage of
Sacrificing principles
Conflict avoidant
Less likely to become effective managers - why? What can be done?
6 facets of agreeableness
Trust
Morality
Altruism
Cooperation
Modesty
Sympathy
Neuroticism
*how easy to judge?
Opposite of emotional stability
Difficult to judge
costs/benefits of Neuroticism
Benefits:
Critical thinking
Preparation
Strong emotions
Costs:
Health risks
Negative emotions
Avoiding social interactions
Interpersonal conflict
6 facets of neuroticism
Anxiety
Anger
Depression
Self-consciousness
Immoderation (not being able to avoid "extremes," lack of restraint)
Vulnerability
Which big 5 personality traits are good predictors across occupations? Which vary?
Conscientiousness and extraversion strong predictors; other vary
which personality traits have a positive/negative relationship with task performance?
help: conscientousness, extraversion (sometimes)
harm: neuroticism
which personality traits have a positive/negative relationship with contextual performance?
Positive: conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, openness
Negative: neuroticism
which personality traits cause counterproductive behaviors?
Conscientiousness
which personality traits have a positive/negative relationship with turnover?
Positive: neuroticism
Negative: Agreeableness, conscientiousness
which personality traits have a positive relationship with safety?
Conscientiousness, neuroticism
Personality fit in the workplace
Poor personality-organization fit produces poor outcomes (e.g., dissatisfaction, turnover)
Look for personality fit in recruitment ads and during interviews
attitude
An evaluation of a person, situation, or object
ex: I am satisfied with my job
I am committed to my organization
I am engaged in my work
components of attitude (3)
Cognitive = Evaluation
* Ex: My supervisor is unfair
Affective = feeling
* Ex: I dislike my supervisor
Behavioral = action
* Ex: I've complained
(All lead to negative attitude towards supervisor)
examples of job attitudes
organizational commitment- values & goals of org
job satisfaction - features of the job itself
work engagement- self0investment in the work itself
affective
relating to the emotions
Why create positive attitudes?
-task performance
-contextual performance
-counterproductive work behavior
-turnover
-well being
-motivation
-customer satisfaction
task performance
the combination of effectiveness and efficiency at doing your core job tasks
Satisfied workers are more productive AND more productive workers are more satisfied!
contextual performance
activities performed by employees that help to maintain the broader organizational environment
More helping behavior, going above and beyond in their jobs
Treadway Tire Case (problems, org. environment, recommendation)
High turnover & job dissatisfaction
Underlying problems: poor training, lack of authority, low morale
High pressure environment
Recommendation:
recruiting
training
notivation
job design
Costs of turnover
recruiting
screening, interviewing, evaluation
training
separation costs (HR staff, unemployment expenses, legal fees)
Solving morale problems: 4 steps
1. Identify the problem
2. Identify root causes (Exit interviews, focus groups...Look for causes in more than one place (culture, job design, supervisors))
3. Create solutions that target the specific problems and establish benchmarks
4. Set targets and implement solutions
Phineas Gage
severe brain injury dramatically changed his personality and behavior; case played a role in the development of the understanding of the localization of brain function
emotions
physiological and psychological experiences toward a person or object
function of emotions
to create a state of readiness
fear: fight or flight
happiness: awareness of opportunities
moods
diffuse feelings that are either positive or negative and tend not to be focused on a specific cause
affect vs emotions vs moods
affect: defines broad range of feelings (emotions or moods)
emotions: caused by specific events; brief; less stable; action-oriented; distinct facial expressions
moods: caused by general/unclear events; lasts for hours/days; less action-oriented
Dispositional Affect
Individual characteristic, or personality trait referring to a person's relatively stable, underlying tendency to experience positive and negative moods
*positive or negative
Russell's circumplex model
valence: pleasure / displeasure
arousal: high / low

Why pay attention to emotions?
1. Emotions drive thinking
2. Emotions motivate
You: Getting 'psyched' yourself
Others: Transformational leadership
Leaders aren't successful only because they have good ideas
Emotional Intelligence (OQ/EI)
Ability to perceive & express emotions accurately
*People prefer to be with managers who can read their moods and judge those people as better managers

Emotional aperature
Distribution of emotions in a group...
ability to recognize and read patterns of collective or group-level emotions, rather than focusing on just a single individual's feelings
Emotional regulation + goal
ability to regulate emotions in both ourselves and others
goal: experience the most appropriate emotional state for the task at hand (smooth interactions with others)
Improving emotional intelligence: identifying emotions
pay attention, listen, observe, ask questions
improving emotional intelligence: using emotions
determine how these feelings influence thinking; change your mood/group mood
Improving emotional intelligence: understanding emotions
consider reasons for feelings, how they will likely change depending on what happens next
Improving emotional intelligence: managing emotions
don't minimize feelings, don't blow them out of proportion; include emotion & rationale for decision-making
Perception
process of receiving information about and making sense of the world around us
process of perception & attribution
Environmental stimuli → attention → organization of info → info interpretaion & retrieval
environmental stimuli
Emotions
Sounds
Vision
Smells
Tastes
Touch
Components of Perception
Perceiver: you
Target: another person, group, an event, situation, idea, noise, or anything that the perceiver focuses on
Situation: the context in which perception takes place - committee meeting, office, hallway etc.
Errors in Perception
Selective attention: conscious & unconscious
Confirmation bias
Primacy effect - first impressions
Recency effect - what have you done for me lately?
Selective attention
We attend to information that is important to us (and miss other important info)
Influenced by:
Size
Intensity
Motion
Repetition
Novelty
Perceptual errors
We can't always trust what we think we see/hear
predispositions to misperceive others that interfere with making completely accurate judgments
We are cognitive misser, we take shortcuts to full processing
This helps us understand the world without being overwhelmed....but we make errors and have predictable biases
Confirmation Bias
We attend to information that supports our decisions, beliefs, and choices
Discredit info that contradicts, Seek out info that fits
Result? We see what we expect to see
**Most common type of fallacy of selective attention
examples of confirmation bias
making political judgements:
Using internet for research & news:
-search websites that fit your view (i.e. fox news vs NBC)
asking leading questions:
-"you agree with me, don't you?"
seeing expected characteristics in job applicants
-"why do you prefer to work alone?"
Instagram algorithm
Primacy effect
first impressions
The initial pieces of information that a perceiver has about a target have an inordinately large effect on the perceiver's perception and evaluation of the target
Recency effect
What have you done for me lately?
The last pieces of information that a perceiver has about a target have an inordinately large effect on the perceiver's perception and evaluation of the target
3 hardest words in the english language
"I don't know"
Stereotypes
Beliefs that members of specific groups share similar traits and are prone to behave in the same way
Dangers of using stereotypes in organizations
False inferences about individual people
Unintentional discrimination
Prejudice: Intentional discrimination
Heuristic thinking
automatic thinking that you do outside of consciousness.
attribution process
why a person acts
process through which individuals attempt to determine causes behind others'behavior
Causes of behavior (internal vs external explanations)
Internal: when the behavior is thought to be under the control of the person
external: when behavior is the result of situational constraints - e.g., chance, rules, custom, task difficulty, luck
Attribution rules
consistency, distinctiveness, consensus
consistency (attriubution rules)
Behaves this way in the same situation over time
Every time this situation arises, the person acts this way = INTERNAL
Distinctiveness (attriubution rules)
Shows different behaviors in other situations
If the behavior is unusual in general for the person = EXTERNAL
consensus (attriubution rules)
Other people also responded this way in the situation = EXTERNAL
fundamental attribution error (FAE)
tendency to attribute other's actions to internal causes while largely ignoring external factors
In general, we tend to blame the person first, not the situation
causes of fundamental attribution error
We want to understand the world
We misunderstand the power of situations
It is easier to make dispositional attributions
Correspondent inferences
judgments about people's dispositions, traits, and characteristics that correspond to what we have observed of their actions
WHO a person is
Halo effect
tendency for overall impressions of others to affect objective evaluations of their specific traits
often vased on a single characteristic, such as socialability or appearance
important in job interviews: Most interviewer's decisions are formed in the first 4-5 minutes
positive halo
good impression causes us to view what the person does in favorable terms
negative halo
bad impression results in consistently low ratings
self-serving bias
the tendency for individuals to attribute their own successes to internal factors while putting the blame for failures on external factors
Got an A? "I studied hard"
Got a C? "The test was unfair"
Perception and Attribution at work
Employment interview and hiring
Performance expectations
Performance evaluations
Employee effort
Ethnic/racial/gender biases and biases against other protected classes
motivation
Psychological forces that cause people to invest effort into action...
direction, intensite, persistence
When people are motivated they have a desire to expend effort
This often results in outcomes of higher:
Performance: quality of work produced
Productivity: quantity of work produced
Intrinsic motivation
Due to the nature of the work itself, such as its inherent interest or challenge
Addressed by Job Characteristics Theory
Extrinsic motivation
Due to rewards that come from the organization, such as pay and promotion
Addressed by Expectancy Theory, Goal Setting, Rewards and Equity Theory
EPO model (extrinsic motivation)
Effort -> performance-> outcome

expectancy theory of motivation
How do employees decide what to work hard at?
(1) Effort → Performance: "expectancy"
(2) Performance → Outcomes: "instrumentality"
(3) Outcomes are Valuable: "valence"
expectancy theory equation
motivation = expectancy x instrumentality x valence
Hummingbird Health
Angela's mistakes:
Lack of alignment between organization's needs and team performance
Failed to actively establish trust with District Manager (Boyar) to open communication and understanding
Has not invested in training/career management for sales team
Action plan for Angela:
Meet with District Manager and then with sales team and follow through on commitments
Use rewards to encourage sharing of ideas/innovation
Work with senior managers to address problems with the current sales plan
Ensure that the process used to arrive at the sales plan is seen as fair
Applying EPO: Strengthen E-P beliefs
Provide more opportunities to use skills
Increase ability (appropriate resourcing & skills training)
Define P clearly (clear goals and expectations)
Communicate how E leads to P
Give appropriate feedback
Applying EPO: Strengthen P-O
Have clear metrics for evaluating performance
Make rewards contingent on P (on what you really want)
Make procedures for earning rewards transparent, consistent and fair
Applying EPO: Strengthen O
Identify and provide what people value—both intrinsic & extrinsic:
rewards (salary, incentives, bonuses, benefits)
reputation (image, respect, appreciation, feedback)
responsibilities (variety, autonomy, challenge, promotions, learning)
rest & relaxation (flexibility, hours, scheduling, travel, location)
relationships (supervisors, coworkers, clients, customers, community)