1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
retrieval failure definition
explanation for forgetting from the LTM. It occurs when we dont have the necessary cues to access the memory
retrieval failure key points
the memory is still stored in the LTM
it cant be accessed because retrieval cues are absent
highlights difference between availability and accessibility
encoding
when we learn the information
retrieval
accessing information stored in the LTM back to conscious awareness in STM
context dependent
external cues present at encoding that support with memory of an event
encoding-specificity principle
by Tulvin
cue must be present at both encoding and retrieval to be effective, otherwise forgetting will occur
2 main cues that trigger retrieval
context-dependent cues (external)
state-dependent cues (internal)
context-dependent forgetting
forgetting that occurs when the external environment during retrieval is different from the environment during encoding
environment factors act as external cues
if you change the physical context between learning and testing, you remove those external cues = making retrieval harder
state-dependent forgetting
forgetting that occurs when an individuals internal state at retrieval is different from their internal state during encoding
your physical or mental state act as an internal cue
if something is learned while in a specific internal state, it’s easier to retrieve it to that same internal state because the cues are matched
divers study
investigate effects of same cues on memory retrieval
18 deep sea divers
they had to learn and recall lists of 36 unrelated words in 4 different conditions:
land - land
land - underwater
underwater - land
underwater - underwater
recall was significantly higher when learning and recalling environments matched
when environments were not matched = recall was around 40% lower
divers study evaluation
✅ high internal validity = strengthens the findings and allows researchers to confidently establish a direct cause and effect between external cues during encoding vs retrieval AND recall rate
❌ sample bias (uses only sea divers) = limits generalisability because results cannot be reliably assumed to represent the behaviour of diverse populations.
antihistamine study
investigated the effects of internal states on memory retrieval
they gave Ps antihistamine drugs which alter the IS
they were asked to recall a list of words across 4 conditions:
drug - drug
drug - placebo
placebo - drug
placebo - placebo
recall was significantly higher when learning and recalling internal states matched
antihistamine study evaluation
✅ high internal validity = strengthens the findings and allows researchers to confidently establish a direct cause and effect between internal cues during encoding vs retrieval AND recall rate.
❌ low ecological validity = limits findings because of its artificial settings that cannot be validly generalised to explain how IS affects memory recall in real life situations