forgetting: retrieval

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

retrieval failure definition

explanation for forgetting from the LTM. It occurs when we dont have the necessary cues to access the memory

2
New cards

retrieval failure key points

  • the memory is still stored in the LTM

  • it cant be accessed because retrieval cues are absent

  • highlights difference between availability and accessibility


3
New cards

encoding

when we learn the information

4
New cards

retrieval

accessing information stored in the LTM back to conscious awareness in STM

5
New cards

context dependent

external cues present at encoding that support with memory of an event

6
New cards

encoding-specificity principle

  • by Tulvin

  • cue must be present at both encoding and retrieval to be effective, otherwise forgetting will occur


7
New cards

2 main cues that trigger retrieval

  • context-dependent cues (external)

  • state-dependent cues (internal)


8
New cards

context-dependent forgetting

  • forgetting that occurs when the external environment during retrieval is different from the environment during encoding

  • environment factors act as external cues

  • if you change the physical context between learning and testing, you remove those external cues = making retrieval harder


9
New cards

state-dependent forgetting

  • forgetting that occurs when an individuals internal state at retrieval is different from their internal state during encoding

  • your physical or mental state act as an internal cue

  • if something is learned while in a specific internal state, it’s easier to retrieve it to that same internal state because the cues are matched


10
New cards

divers study

  • investigate effects of same cues on memory retrieval

  • 18 deep sea divers

  • they had to learn and recall lists of 36 unrelated words in 4 different conditions:

  • land - land

  • land - underwater

  • underwater - land

  • underwater - underwater

  • recall was significantly higher when learning and recalling environments matched

  • when environments were not matched = recall was around 40% lower


11
New cards

divers study evaluation

✅ high internal validity = strengthens the findings and allows researchers to confidently establish a direct cause and effect between external cues during encoding vs retrieval AND recall rate

❌ sample bias (uses only sea divers) = limits generalisability because results cannot be reliably assumed to represent the behaviour of diverse populations.

12
New cards

antihistamine study

  • investigated the effects of internal states on memory retrieval

  • they gave Ps antihistamine drugs which alter the IS

  • they were asked to recall a list of words across 4 conditions:

  • drug - drug

  • drug - placebo

  • placebo - drug

  • placebo - placebo

  • recall was significantly higher when learning and recalling internal states matched


13
New cards

antihistamine study evaluation

✅ high internal validity = strengthens the findings and allows researchers to confidently establish a direct cause and effect between internal cues during encoding vs retrieval AND recall rate.

❌ low ecological validity = limits findings because of its artificial settings that cannot be validly generalised to explain how IS affects memory recall in real life situations