1/144
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Forming
Little agreement, unclear purpose, guidance & direction
Storming
Conflict, increased clarity of purpose, power struggles,coaching
Norming
Agreement & consensus, clear roles & responsibilities, facilitation
Performing
Clear vision & purpose, focus on goal achievement, delegation
Adjouring
Task completion, good feeling about achievements, recognition
Role
a set of expected behaviors for a particular position
Role perception
our view of how we’re supposed to act in a given situation
Role expectations
How others believe you should act in a given situation
Role conflict
Conflict experienced when multiple roles are incompatible
Norms
Shared attitudes, opinions, feelings, or behaviors that guide individual & group behavior, considered rules/standards of conduct that are supposed to guide members, help members to guide their own behavior & predict what others will do
Cohesion
The emotional attraction among group members, share credit, higher participation, increased conformity to team norms, more productive, more prone to groupthink
Trust
A reciprocal belief that another person will consider how their intentions & behaviors will affect you, when we feel/observe others trust us we’re more likely to trust them
Contractual trust
Trust of character
Communication trust
Trust of disclosure
Competence trust
Trust of capability, quick trust
Communication
The exchange of information between a sender & a receiver, & the inference (perception) of meaning between the individuals involved
Sender
Encodes message & selects medium
Message
Transmitted through a medium
Receiver
Decodes message & decides that feedback is needed
Receiver
Sends feedback through a medium
Noise
Anything that interferes with the transmission & understanding of the message
Active listening
Fully invested, full attention, expend energy by participating
Involved listening
Partially invested, devoting some attention, inconsistent participation
Passive listening
Not my responsibility to be an active participant, not an equal partner
Detached listening
Disinterested, bored, distracted, inattentive
Defensiveness
Occurs when people perceive they’re being attacked/threatened
Empathy
Ability to recognize & understand another person’s feelings & thoughts
Crucial conversations
Occurs when stakes are high, opinions vary, & emotions run strong, people may avoid them, face them & handle them poorly, or face them & handle them well
Share your facts
Start with the facts alone not your emotion-driven story, facts are least controversial, facts are least likely to offend, & facts help start at the beginning
Tell your story
You have to follow up that observation (fact) with your conclusions, if you simply mention the facts the other person may not understand the implications, take the risk & be selective
Ask for other’s facts & stories
Ask for other person’s facts (observation) & story (conclusion) to get their perspective of the situation
Talk tentatively
When you’re sharing your story remember that it’s an interpretation & not a fact so don’t tell the story as though it’s a fact
Encourage testing
Invite opposing views & challenge your own thinking to encourage active dialogue
Silence
Understating true opinions, using phrases like “some people” instead of “I”, changing the topic when sensitive subject are brought up, withdrawing from conversations/relationships
Violence
Exaggerating by using absolutes, labeling & name-calling, monopolizing conversation, using directive (yes/no) questions to control, belittling ideas/people, threatening
Psychological safety
The extent to which people feel free to express their ideas & beliefs without fear of negative consequences
Conflict
Occurs when a perceived gap exists between what is desired & what is experienced
Relationship conflict
Disagreements stemming from interpersonal issues within a team, harmful to team performance & outcomes
Task conflict
Disagreements about how a task should be done, debate over the right strategy for a project or a difference of opinion about how to allocate resources, result in better decisions & outcomes
Integrating
High concern for others & self
Obliging
High concern for others & low concern for self
Dominating
Low concern for others & high concern for self
Avoiding
Low concern for others & self
Negotiations
A give-and-take decision-making process between 2 or more persons with different preferences
Bargaining mix
Things that will be formally part of the final agreement
Tangible
The things in the contract; price, delivery, quantity, other termsI
Intangible
The unspoken things; “winning”, reputation, being fair, the relationship
Interests
Intangible, why you want what you’re asking for, a party’s underlying reasons, values, or motivations, explains why someone takes a certain position, focusing on interests expand the pie & both get more from the negotiation
Positions
Surface statements of where a person/organization stands, rarely provide insight into underlying motivations, values, or incentives
Distributive negotiation
Competing, for one of us to gain the other has to lose, interests conflict, fixed pie mentality, appropriate in simple, single-issue negotiations (haggling), focus on positions, low information sharing, short-term relationship
Integrative negotiation
Both come away better-off by working together, not all interests conflict, expanding the pie, underlying issues important to both parties, focus on interests, high information sharing, long-term relationship
Best alternative to negotiated agreement (BATNA)
What you have if you fail to agree in this negotiation, alternative options, if the current negotiation outcomes don’t satisfy your interest the best you can do for yourself if you walk away & go with your BATNA, better your BATNA the greater your power, difference is bargaining power
Target
Ideal goal, what you’d really like to get but don’t have to get, specific & ambitious number
Resistance point (RP)
Single number, worst deal you’re willing to accept, keeps you from accepting a lousy offer, base our RP on our BATNA
Job-based vs person based compensation
Work performed vs added value
Multi-hire vs individual-hire
Less bargaining power when multiple people are hired on at once
Precedent for salary negotiation
Can’t negotiate salary but what else is on the tableL
Location considerations
Location isn’t optimal, what can you do for me
Decision-making
The process of choosing a course of action for dealing with a problem/opportunity, only true distinctive characteristic of managers
Confirmation bias
How we selectively gather information, the decision maker subconsciously decides something even before investigating why it’s the right decision & seeks information that supports the decision while discounting information that doesn’t, leads us to collect information that supports our beliefs/views
Overconfidence bias
Overestimating our skills relative to those of others & overestimating the accuracy of our predictions, grows in strength when people are asked moderate to extremely difficult questions rather than easy ones, entrepreneurs often fall prey when deciding to start & sustain new ventures
Availability bias
Decision maker’s tendency to base decisions on information that is readily available in memory, leads us to overestimate the importance of information we recently received/thought about even if it’s not the best/most accurate information, likely to cause people to overestimate the occurrence of unlikely events
Anchoring bias
Decision makers are influenced by the first information received about a decision even if it’s irrelevant, happens because initial information, impressions, data, feedback, or stereotypes anchor our subsequent judgements & decisions
Priming effect
Occurs when an individual’s exposure to a certain stimulus influences their responses to a subsequent prompt without any awareness of the connection
Rush to solve effect
People in a hurry often fail to consider all of the possible data before making their decision, one datum can influence the interpretation of all other information
Hindsight bias
Occurs when knowledge of an outcome influences our belief about the probability that we could’ve predicted the outcome earlier, in retrospect we get overconfident about our foresight which leads to bad decisions
Framing bias
Relates to the manner in which a question is posed/framed, shows that our decisions are influenced by the manner in which a problem/question is framed, susceptibility to framing effects increases with age, people will make riskier decisions when framed as a loss
Escalation of commitment bias
Not treating past investments as sunk-costs when deciding to continue an investment, ego tied to a project
Centrality
Establishing a network of task & interpersonal relationships
Criticality
Importance of your work to others
Flexibility
Freedom to exercise your own judgement
Visibility
Interacting with influential people in the organization, being widely known for your work
Relevance
Working on the central objectives & issues in an organization
Hard tactics
Exert more overt pressure, coalition, pressure, legitimizing tactics
Soft tactics
Friendlier & not as coercive, rational persuasion, inspirational appeals, consultations, ingratiation, personal appeals
Retribution
If you don’t do X you’ll regret it
Reciprocity
If you do X you’ll receive Y rewards
Reason
You should do X because it’s good for the company & you
Commitment
Person internally agrees with the decision/request, likely to make a great effort to carry out the request
Compliance
Person is willing to carry out request to gain reward/avoid punishment, likely to be apathetic & give up easily when obstacles are encountered
Resistance
Actively tries to avoid carrying out the request, excuses, delay, go to higher authority, sabotage, outright refusal
Reciprocity
Obligation to give when you receive
Scarcity
People want more of those things they can have less of
Authority
People will follow credible, knowledgeable experts
Consistency
Looking & asking for commitments that can be made
Liking
People who are similar to us
Consensus/social proof
People will look to the actions of others to determine their own
Organizational politics
Intentional acts of influence to enhance/protect the self-interest of individuals/groups that aren’t endorsed by/aligned with those of the organization
Conformity
Agreeing with someone else’s opinion to gain his/her approval
Favors
Doing something nice for someone to gain that person’s approval
Excuses
Explaining a predicament-creating event aimed at minimizing the apparent severity of the predicament
Apologies
Admitting responsibility for an undesirable event & simultaneously seeking to get a pardon for the action
Self-promotion
Highlighting your best qualities, downplaying your deficits, & calling attention to your achievements
Enhancement
Claiming that something you did is more valuable than most other members of the organizations would think
Flattery
Complimenting others about their virtues in an effort to make yourself appear perceptive & likeable
Exemplification
Doing more than you need to in an effort to show how dedicated & hardworking you are
Trait theory
Focus on personal qualities & characteristics, predict leadership emergence & effectiveness, you’re either a leader or you’re not, ohio state theory
Behavioral theory
Focus on leader behaviors, we can determine leadership effectiveness by leader behavior, we can train people to be leaders
Initiating structure
The extent to which a leader is likely to define & structure his/her role & those of subordinates in the search for goal attainment
Consideration
The extent to which a leader is likely to have job relationships characterized by mutual trust, respect for subordinates’ ideas, & regard for their feelings