Learn: PECN WOO KMS

How the three authors fit together

Piketty = the history and data (inequality is a political and ideological choice). Stiglitz = the economic theory (markets fail without rules; freedom = a person's opportunity set). Reich = the political mechanism (the wealthy write the rules through lobbying and money in politics).

Two factors besides war behind the 1914-1950 fall in private wealth (Piketty)

(1) Policies that reduced property value: nationalizations, expropriations (incl. decolonization and revolution), rent control, laws limiting owners' rights. (2) Low private savings and investment: savings lent to governments as war bonds, then eroded by inflation.

War destruction (Piketty)

Explains only a minority of the 1914-1950 collapse in private wealth.

Property regime

The set of rules defining property. Piketty: the value of property depends on it. Stiglitz: property rights are a social construction, not natural facts.

Property rights as social construction (Stiglitz)

Rules society defines, involving trade-offs between different people's freedoms. This is why changing the rules after the wars could change what property was worth.

Exceptional one-time taxes on large fortunes

Post-war fiscal innovation (France 1945, Japan 1946, Germany 1952) that paid down public debt and funded reconstruction.

Lastenausgleich

Germany's 1952 one-time tax on large fortunes (burden-sharing levy) used for post-war reconstruction.

Steeply progressive income and inheritance taxes

Fiscal innovation with top rates of about 81% (income) and 75% (estates) in the US 1932-1980, and 89% and 72% in the UK. Stopped fortunes from rebuilding and funded the social state.

Stiglitz's moral case for progressive taxation

Market incomes have little moral primacy, so there is little moral reason not to tax them. Revenue spent on education and social programs expands the poor's opportunity set, so total freedom increases on balance.

Opportunity set (Stiglitz)

His definition of freedom: the range of real choices and opportunities a person has.

Reich on cutting top tax rates

Once top rates were cut, money and political power flowed back upward together.

Neoproprietarianism (Piketty)

Post-1980 rebirth of proprietarian ideology: property is sacralized, capital moves freely with no tax coordination, countries compete to cut taxes, and communism's failure is used to discredit redistribution.

Transparency problem (Piketty)

Offshore wealth and weakened tax statistics make inequality hard to measure, and therefore hard to tax or debate. Piketty's fix: fiscal transparency.

How ideology persists (Stiglitz)

Preferences and beliefs are shaped by the economic system itself, and confirmation bias leads people to discount evidence against their beliefs.

Confirmation bias

The tendency to discount evidence that contradicts existing beliefs. Stiglitz uses it to explain why neoliberal ideology persists.

"There is no alternative"

Neoliberal claim that handed rule-writing to technocrats (Stiglitz).

Imperfect information (Stiglitz)

A key market failure. Neoliberal response: no disclosure requirements ("buyer beware"). Stiglitz's response: mandatory disclosure.

Reich on lobbying and transparency

Corporate lobbying and campaign money operate largely out of public view, so citizens can't see how the rules are being rewritten.

American primacy in education (Piketty)

The US led in mass education (early universal primary schooling, near-universal secondary by mid-20th century), far ahead of Europe and Japan.

Source of US productivity advantage (Piketty)

Its lead in education, not inequality.

Post-1980 US education (Piketty)

The US lost its lead as higher education became stratified by parental income, and productivity growth slowed.

Three roles of education (Stiglitz)

(1) Creates human capital. (2) Is freeing: expands agency and lets people see beyond inherited views. (3) Expands the opportunity set.

Income-contingent loans

Student loans where repayment depends on what the graduate earns. Stiglitz's remedy (with public investment) for underinvestment in education.

Underinvestment in education (Stiglitz)

A consequence of neoliberalism's "leave it to the private sector" stance on public goods.

What 1945-1980s showed was possible (Piketty)

Strong growth alongside (1) steeply progressive taxation, (2) low and falling inequality with deconcentrated property and a lower wealth-to-income ratio, (3) a large social state with heavy public investment in education and health and falling public debt.

US growth after the 1980s tax cuts (Piketty)

US per capita growth roughly halved.

Protective states (Stiglitz)

Countries like Sweden, Norway, and Iceland have higher living standards and less authoritarian populism. Authoritarianism grows when government does too little, not too much.

New Deal and British postwar welfare state

Rapid, large-scale changes that democracies achieved without revolution (Stiglitz).

Reich on postwar prosperity

Broadly shared because the rules (strong unions, financial regulation like Glass-Steagall, progressive taxes) were set to widen opportunity.

Neoliberalism (Stiglitz, Ch. 11)

The presumption that markets are efficient and government ruins things.

Neoliberal stance: externalities

Deregulate. Result: pollution, pandemics, the Great Recession.

Neoliberal stance: public goods

Leave it to the private sector. Result: underinvestment in education, health, infrastructure.

Neoliberal stance: lack of competition

Markets are naturally competitive (Chicago School, Bork). Result: market power, high prices, lower wages.

Neoliberal stance: macro fluctuations

Blame workers' wages; fixed deficit and inflation rules. Result: austerity and deep recessions such as Greece.

Neoliberal stance: excessive inequality

Leave it to the market. Result: poverty, deaths of despair, weakened democracy.

Neoliberalism is "self-negating" (Stiglitz)

It is not self-sustaining: inequality becomes political inequality, which entrenches the rules that produced it.

"One dollar, one vote"

Stiglitz's phrase for economic inequality turning into political inequality.

Trump's 2017 tax cut (Stiglitz)

Widened the fiscal hole without producing the promised investment.

"Free market" as a myth (Reich)

Government always sets the rules: property, monopoly, contracts, bankruptcy, and enforcement.

Powell memo

1970s memo; since then businesses have organized to shape the rules in their favor (Reich).

Reich's examples of rule-rigging

Unregulated derivatives, repeal of Glass-Steagall, the Medicare drug-negotiation ban.

Corporate welfare, revolving door, 34 to 1

Reich's evidence of corporate influence: subsidies to firms, officials moving into lobbying, and corporations outspending unions 34 to 1.

Piketty's summary of neoproprietarianism's effects

Re-sacralized property, cut top taxes, freed capital to move. Inequality rose, growth slowed, public wealth fell.

Negative public wealth (Piketty)

Public assets minus public debt has fallen to near zero or below in the US, UK, and Italy while private wealth rose to about 5-6 times national income.

Taxes the wealthy no longer pay (Piketty)

They are lent back to the state with interest, so private bondholders own claims on future tax revenue. A result of deliberate choices.

Stiglitz on poor states

A poor state can't fund the public investment, social insurance, and green transition needed to correct market failures. Privatization and PPPs often socialize losses and privatize gains.

Reich on bailouts and subsidies

Bailouts (such as AIG) and subsidies show public money propping up private wealth while ordinary taxpayers carry the debt.

Codetermination (co-management)

German and Nordic system giving workers one-third to one-half of board seats in large firms.

Codetermination pros: Piketty

Challenges sacralized property, gives workers a role in long-term strategy, lowers wage inequality and executive pay, doesn't hurt productivity.

Codetermination pros: Stiglitz

Fits his "ecology of institutions" and checks on concentrated power; limiting owners' power expands workers' opportunity sets.

Codetermination pros: Reich

Restores the countervailing power lost with the decline of US unions, a central cause of upward redistribution.

Codetermination cons and limits

Shareholders keep the casting vote; applies only to large firms and never spread to the US, UK, or France; doesn't reduce wealth concentration; national only, so no answer to global tax competition; reduces owners' asset value and control.

Meidner plan

Swedish plan to transfer ownership to wage-earner funds; it was abandoned.

Participatory socialism (Piketty)

Piketty's proposed fix: 50% of board seats for workers, caps on any single large shareholder's voting power, and progressive wealth taxes so ownership becomes temporary and circulates.