G12 law test

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

3 sources of the consitution

  1. Written laws

  2. Statutes and court decisions

  3. Conventions


2
New cards

Federal vs Provincial Jurisdiction

Federal = Big Picture Canada - country

  • Criminal law

  • Defence

  • Immigration

  • Banking

  • Trade

    Provincial = Local Issues - community

    • Education

    • Hospitals/health care

    • Property

    • Municipalities

    • Civil rights


3
New cards

Intra Vires & Ultra Vires

Intra vires - in power

Ultra vires - beyond power

4
New cards

Pith and Substance Doctrine

Definition: A court looks at the true purpose and main effect of a law.

Used when:

  • Federal and provincial governments disagree about who has authority.


5
New cards

Evolution of Canada's Constitution

  1. Royal proclamation (1763)

  2. quebec act (1774)

  3. consitution act (1791)

  4. act of union (1840)

  5. bna act (1867)

  6. statute of westminster (1931)

  7. patriation of consitution (1982)

  8. meech lake accord (1987)

  9. charlottetown accord (1992)

  10. quebec referndum (1995)

    RP → QA → CA1791 → AU → BNA → SW → PC1982 → Meech → Charlottetown → Referendum


6
New cards

Royal proclamation 1763

  • Britain takes control after defeating France.

  • Indigenous land rights recognized.

  • English law introduced


7
New cards

Quebec act 1774

  • French language, religion, and civil law protected.


8
New cards

Consitution act 1791

  • Upper Canada (Ontario)

  • Lower Canada (Quebec)


9
New cards

Act of union 1840

  • Upper + Lower Canada united.


10
New cards

bna act 1867

Created Confederation:

  • Ontario

  • Quebec

  • Nova Scotia

  • New Brunswick

Created federal and provincial governments.

11
New cards

statute of westminster 1931

  • Canada gains legislative independence from Britain.


12
New cards

patriation of consitution 1982

  • Constitution brought home from Britain.

  • Charter of Rights and Freedoms added.

  • Canada can amend its own constitution.


13
New cards

meech lake accord 1987

  • Tried to get Quebec to sign Constitution.

  • Failed.


14
New cards

charlotte town accord 1992

  • Another constitutional reform attempt.

  • Rejected by voters.


15
New cards

quebec referendum 1995

  • Quebec voted on separation.

  • "No" won by a very small margin.


16
New cards

supreme court of canada

Highest court in Canada.

Hears:

  • Important constitutional cases

  • Significant criminal appeals

  • Major civil appeals

Decisions are final.

17
New cards

provincial courts

Most common entry point.

Hear:

  • Minor criminal offences

  • Traffic offences

  • Family matters (depending on province)

  • Small claims


18
New cards

superior courts

Hear:

  • Serious criminal cases

  • Divorce

  • Large civil disputes


19
New cards

court of appeal

Reviews decisions from lower courts.

20
New cards

federal court

Deals with federal matters:

  • Immigration

  • Tax

  • Federal government disputes

  • Intellectual property


21
New cards

bill of rights vs charter


A Bill of Rights limits government power to protect individual liberties

Charter of Rights provides broader protections, including equality and minority rights, and may allow for certain legal limitations.

22
New cards

when did the charter become law

1982 when the constitution was patriated

23
New cards

section 1 of the charter says:

Rights are guaranteed,

BUT

Government may limit them if the limit is reasonable and justified in a free and democratic society.

24
New cards

Why Must Government Justify Limits?

to prevent governments from taking away rights without a good reason.

The government must prove:

  • The objective is important.

  • The limit is necessary.


25
New cards

oakes test steps


  1. is a charter right violated?

  2. is the government’s objective important?

  3. does the law actually help achieve the goal?, does it limit rights as little as possible?, do the beenfits outweigh the harm to rights?