1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Who made it
Aquinas
What is the general idea
Everything has a cause except for God as he is necessary
Point 1 of his logic
There are some things which exist contingently
Point 2 of his logic
If something exists only contingent, then there is some time at which it did not exist
point 3 of his logic
If everything exists contingently then at one time nothing existed
Point 4 of his logic
If at one time nothing existed then now nothing exists
Point 5
some things exist now
Point 6
It is not the case that at one point nothing existed
Point 7
It is not the case everything exists contingently
Point 8
There is something which does not exist contingently
How does Aquinas link point 8 to God
Only God has the power to be self-sufficient and uncaused
What type of argument is the cosmological
posteriori
Hume’s first crit
Nothing can be logically necessary unless its opposite implies a contradiction so God is not necessary
Fallacy of composition
Aquinas assumes that because everything within the universe is contingent, the universe as a whole must also be contingent
Why it proves God
aligns with big bang, removes infinite regress and only God has the power to be uncaused
Russel criticism
The universe may simply exist as a brute fact requiring no cause.
Russel’s mother analogy
Just because every individual thing in the universe has a cause, it does not mean that the universe as a whole has one single creator.
Evidence for Russel
Quantum events suggest that some things happen without a cause, which supports Russell’s premise that we cannot assume everything must have a cause.