1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
copernicus’ heliocentric system
planets on circles around sun
not ellipses nor spheres
problem: planet’s orbits are ellipses
fixed this with minor epicycles
copernicus’ model and parallax
stars had to be exceedingly far away
ptolemy
geocentrism
very “complicated”
copernicus
heliocentric
less complicated
copernicus + ptolemy
models had similar level of accuracy
used epicycles, copernicus used less
perfect circles
G. bruno (1548)
proposes that Sun is one star out of an infinite number
new inventions in baroque era
telescope
air pump
tycho barhe
postions of planets
worked without telescope
stellar and planetary positions
comets and novas are extralunar
shows that stars can change (supernova of 1572)
proves that comets are superlunar
the closer an object is…
the more shifted it appears wrt the fixed stars
tycho measures parallax 0 for Great comet of 1577 and supernova of 1572
objects must be beyond the moon: change without circular motion—contradicts aristotle
kepler’s question
how are things happening?
kepler’s construction of the orbit of mars
triangulated position of mars using Brahe’s data
kepler’s 3 laws
law of ellipses
law of equal areas
harmonic law
law of ellipses
orbits of planets are ellipses, with the sun at one focus
a = semimajor axis
e = eccentricity
law of equal areas
an imaginary line connecting the sun to any planet sweeps out equal areas of the ellipse in equal times
harmonic law

tycho’s hybrid solar system model
sun orbits earth
planets orbit sun
scientific method
francis bacon, descartes, galileo
yields conclusions that are independent of the individual

conclusions are based on observation
aristotle’s model of the cosmos
heavenly bodies are perfect, smooth, and unchanging
galileo’s telescopes
1st: 3x magnifying
last: 32x
galileo findings
moutains and craters on the moon
moons of jupiter
sunspots
phases of venus
milky way is made up of stars
ears of saturn
why are phases of venus at odds with the geocentric epicycle model?
venus would not appear “full” as the moon does
issac newton question
why are things happening
newton’s 3 laws of motion and law of universal gravitation explain…
kepler’s laws
inertia
an object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion remains in motion at a constant speed and in a straight line unless acted upon by a force
force and acceleration
F = ma
action and reaction
for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction
acceleration
rate of change of velocity
change in speed or direction
barycenter of earth and moon
moon doesn’t orbit earth’s center and earth doesn’t stay still
earth and moon orbit each other about the barycenter
why inverse quadratic
the influence “thins out” as the distance from the source increases (scales like area)
compromise of orbital motion
planet moves in curved orbit
hooke’s polygon model
continual pulls towards the center

it takes a … force to make a higher speed move in an orbit
stronger
newton’s law explains
baseball, cannonball, water motion
tides
atoms
moon around earth
1919 eddington experiment
Einstein’s theory of relativity correctly predicted that gravity would bend light
comparing photographs and measuring tiny distances on glass plates under a microscope
results of eddington experiment
gravity is not a force, it is the curvature of spacetime
space, time, matter, and energy are all connected
objects and light follow curved spacetime
spacetime
3 spatial dimensions
1 time dimension
space and time are linked together
mass and energy warp spacetime to produce gravity
GPS
GPS must account for relativity
satellite’s motion and distance from earth’s gravity alter their time wrt on earth