1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Ideology
a belief system distinguished by:
coherence
stability
contrast
Coherence/constraint
set of ideas interconnected or linked by an underlying logic: holding one belief should predict holding another
begs the question: what counts as logic here?
stability
relatively stable set of ideas, staying stable over time
Contrast
can be distinguished from other sets of ideas
Spatiality
represent ideology on a graph with one or more axis, typically one dimension
Ex: scale of liberalism to conservatism
Very limited
Not generalizable beyond the U.S. context
Can’t reduce ideology to dimensions at all
Multiple dimension ideology
emerged from the 1960s-70s social issues (abortion, equal rights) which didn’t fit in the classic left-right spectrum
is 2d enough? Do other axis exist?
Symbolic ideology
the label/identity (affective, emotional attachment)
normal people are mostly this, with strong party loyalty
Operational identity
where one actually stands on issue positions
Symbolic vs. operational
issue preferences do not always accord ideological self
people may label themselves as something but don’t know what that means
Their views don’t match their label
Bipolarity
distribution of ideology being polar opposites
spatial approach assumes bipolarity
people may define labels using entirely different concepts
Problem: these may not be opposite views but just fundamentally different ones
Cognitive Affective Mapping (CAM)
a different spatial approach based on how people speak on certain topics
but to what extent does speech reveal ideology
Liberalism: historical origins
Starts as a critical response to earlier, medieval social order
early modern Europe
individuals were subordinate to their clans, tribes and extended families/kingdoms
People saw issues with how people were prescribed into hierarchical role
Liberalism
emphasis on the importance of the individual, the idea of liberation/emancipation from complete subservience to the group
push for individual freedom
relaxation of tight hold of customs, law and authority
early ideas of liberalism emerged as a solution to wanting individual freedom but no conflict
individualism, freedom, limits on government power
Liberalism: strategy of limits on government power
liberal thinkers struggled with the need for a strong government and their commitments to individual freedom
Hobbes: Argued the absolute power of a sovereign is justified not by divine right, but by the consent of the governed who agree (by social contract) to obey in exchange for peace and security
John Locke
Promoted a social contract theory of government
people have “natural rights” to freedom of thought, speech and worship
legitimate government is the result of a social contract in which people conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to ensure stability
government’s purpose is to protect the person and property of individuals and guarantee their “natural rights”
Property, according to Locke
Life being your own, liberty being your own and then your materials as well
Locke’s labor theory
something becomes yours when you put yourself and your own labor into it
places some limits: have to leave enough for others
spoilage: can’t take a bunch of stuff and let it spoil
Positive liberty
you have the freedom to
government provides services to enable people
Negative liberty
you have the freedom from
freedom from a tyrannical government
Economic liberalism
a critical response to dominance of mercantilism (maximizing exports, minimizing imports)
rejects mercantilism — economics should be free of politics
economy should be an open area where people freely come together and exchange goods/services
John Mill’s harm principle
The one legitimate reason to restrict someone’s liberty: preventing harm to others
can’t restrict marketplace of ideas
should not restrict liberty for public disapproval or “it’s for your own good”
Liberalism vs. Democracy
Liberalism: concerned with the scope of government power and activity, motivated by a commitment to individual freedom
Democracy: concerned with popular sovereignty — ensuring that governments derive their authority from “the people” (popular elections)
Liberal ideology inspired what events?
American Revolution and French Revolution
Conservation Synthesis (Burke)
Need to respect some aspects of the past, or there’s risk of excessive individualism
traditions, cultires
Burke
A liberal technically
Against abstract quests, such as maximizing equality, liberty and wealth
Not an extreme supporter of free markets
Scruton
Conservative allegiance to society is an end in itself, not a means to something else
Not every old tradition deserves loyalty, some conservatives should be rejected
torture for punishment of crimes
Tradition is enacted, not designed
Nationalism
belief that humanity is divided into various nations
members of a nation ought to value their nations/national identity
Must have some form of political sovereignty
Nationalism: historical context
Emerged in late 18th century, more rapidly in the 19th century (Age of Nationalism)
Very modern ideology
Liberal/early nationalism
Closely tied to growing popularity of liberalism and democracy
Emphasis on ideals of individual freedom — popular sovereignty, autonomy, degitimate desire for self-rule
What defines a nation?
Involuntary ties — common historical origins, shared race or ethnicity, common language, culture, customs, traditions, norms
Herder
nationalism
Emphasized the importance of language in nations, not religion, ethnicity, or history
ethnic nationalism: based on beliefs about non-voluntary membership and identity, emphasizes ethnicity, race, bloodlines, genetics, etc
Renan
nationalism
Rejects geography, religion, race, language, etc, as criteria for nationhood
A nation is voluntary and defined by shared lived experiences and commitment to a shared future/destiny
civic nationalism: based on voluntaristic and inclusive principles, emphasizing shared experience, history, and future
can be any people
Smith’s three stories for nationalism
Economic, political power, constitutive
Socialism: historical context
Emerged in 19-century Europe during industrialization
Reaction against laissez-faire capitalism and harsh working conditions
Critiqued early capitalism
Socialism
Economic equality, some degree of collective ownership, cooperation over competition
Communism
abolition of private property, classless and stateless society, full collective ownership
Saint Simon
Socialism
Wanted society organized for the benefit of its most productive members (scientists, engineers, industrialists) rather than nobles or clergy
Cooperation, not class conflict, would drive progress
Marx and Engels
Communism
Lower middle class is reactionary
Bourgeoisie is a sorcerer who can’t control his forces (upper class is out of control)
Overproduction leads to constant crisis
Lenin
socialism and communism in practice
Marxism-Leninism: a vanguard party of professional revolutionaries must lead the working class
Vanguard party rule: socialism, then communism
Economists/intellectuals need to break out of a mold and start teaching the working class about political knowledge
Mao
communism/socialism in China
A “new-democratic” revolution first, socialism later
Fascism: historical context
influenced by social Darwinism and the ideas of struggle, hierarchy and survival of the fittest
Drew on nationalist and anti-Enlightenment traditions, emphasizing emotion, myth, and collective identity
Reject the idea of some orderly, rational progression of history: emotion and gut instincts were much more vital, effective drivers of history
Gustave Le Bon
fascism
crowd mind: emotional, weak-minded, easily swayed
Georges Sorel
Disillusioned syndicalist: “the ballot box has replaced the gun”
Myth: the general strike as a unifying vision, not a literal plan
Violence: a legitimate, even necessary force to deny a decaying order
Mussolini
fascism
fascism is opposed to democracy, but is also the purest form of democracy
rejected class struggle and internationalism
History driven by will, power, and myth, not by economic forces
Fascism transcends both liberalism and socialism
Fascism: mythic core
Griffin’s mythic core: a genus of political ideology whose mythic core is a palingenetic form of populist ultra-nationalism
Fascism: thematic checklist definition
Eatwell: Three recurring themes: the “new man”, a “hollistic man”, a “third way” between capitalism and socialism
Fascism: historical process definition
Paxton: Not a fixed ideology, but a process: creation, then rooting as a party, then acquiring power, then exercising and radicalizing power
Fascism vs. communism (similarities)
challenged liberalism: social ills believed to be associated with too much individual freedom
Emphasized new man, new world, themes of utopianism
Both drew from Marxism
Fascism vs. communism (differences)
Fascism emphasizes class collaboration for national renewal, communism emphasizes class conflict
Fascism tied more closely to nationalism
Fascism accepts private property, but promotes a corporatist approach to economic development
Fascism pushes an exclusive form of national identity, communism has an ideological identity
Fascism has a less antagonistic relationship with organized religion