1/41
lecture given 10/20/2026
survey crown
a full coverage crown designed to support, retain, and stabilize a removable partial denture (RPD)
design incorporates specific features that accommodate the RPDs path of insertion (GP), support (rest seat), and retention (undercut) requirements
support
resistance of prothesis to move towards the ridge
provided by rest seats
retention
resistance of prosthesis to move away from the ridge
provided by retentive arm
stability
resistance of prosthesis to move in lateral direction
provided by GP, minor connectors, retentive arm, ect
what are indications for survey crowns?
heavily restored or broken down tooth which will serve as a primary or secondary abutment for an RPD
replacing an existing crown on a tooth which will serve as an abutment for an RPD
unable to satisfy the requirements for the RPD design by minor modifications of the abutment tooth
correction of occlusal plane
develop acceptable RPD path of insertion
esthetics- attachment-retained RPD’s
splinting- double abutting for stress distribution or attachment retained RPD’s / FPD to replace a single missing tooth or splint a lone standing tooth
primary abutment
rest seat + clasp
secondary abutment
rest seat only
why would you splint teeth for an RPD?
better stress distribution
can be a better option than complete mandibular denture
what are contra-indications for survey crowns?
teeth with questionable prognosis or poor long term prognosis
satisfaction of the RPD design requirement can be ahcieved with minor tooth modification (more conservative approach)
full cast (gold) survey crown
pros: conservative prep, no risk of fracture
cons: esthetics, high cost
PFM survey crown
pros: esthetics
cons: aggressive prep, risk of porcelain fracture, high cost
all-ceramic zirconia survey crown
pros: conservative prep, esthetics, low cost, efficient workflow, good fracture reistance, facilitates retro fitting crown to existing RPD
cons: lack of long-term research and clinical documentation
material selection
preferred crown material- PFM, full cast
zirconia may be considered for retrofitting crown to an existing RPD
what are the steps for fabrication of survey crown- diagnostic phase?
diagnosis and treatment planning
mounted diagnostic casts- occlusal plane analysis, ensure sufficient inter arch space present
survey of study cast and finalize RPD design
wax up, incorporate GP and rest seat in wax up, putty matrix of wax up
optional but highly recommended- duplicate wax up cast and fabricate a clear vaccuform stent to be used as a prep guide to ensure sufficient reduction
how much reduction is needed for a rest seat?
1-2mm, average of 1.5mm
what are the steps for fabrication of survey crown- clinical phase?
prep and temp- putty matrix to fabricate provisional, clear vaccuform stent to verify reduction
RPD abutment preps: rest seats, GP, and undercuts must be done prior to crown final impression
final impression for crown fabrication (full arch, must capture the RPD abutments and edentulous ridge), consider using a custom tray
what are the steps for fabrication of survey crown- lab phase?
pouring of final impression and mounting- pour the impression twice (first pour master cast that gets sectioned and pindexed, second pour is solid cast)
if case can be hand articulated proceed to mounting
if case cannot be hand articulated (insufficient/unstable posterior stops), a record base and wax rim must be fabricated on the second pour (solid cast)
survey and tripod of master cast
mounting of master cast
case sent to lab for crown fabrication
after crown returns from lab, it must be re-surveyed prior to insertion appt, if any modifications needed must be done prior to cementation
what are the steps for fabrication of survey crown- crown insertion phase?
crown insertion
preliminary impression for RPD design verification
final impression for RPD frame fabrication
guide planes- designing a survey crown
fabricated in metal
tooth borne RPD- maximum length in occlusogingival direction (min 2/3), flat in occlusalgingival direction, curved in buccolingual direction
distal extension RPD- reduced occlusogingival length (<1/2), flat in occlusogingival direction, curved in buccolingual direction
rest seats- designing a survey crown for posterior teeth
fabricated in metal
round, the floor slopes towards the center of the tooth, broad buccolingually (1/3-1/2 occlusal BL width), if the tooth receiving a survey crown has an adjacent tooth the rest seat must be designed with a flare, sufficient clearance (min 1mm of metal thickness, preferably 2mm), rounded angle between the guide plane and rest seat
rest seats- designing a survey crown for anterior teeth
fabricated in metal
cingulum rest seats or ML rest seat
same guidelines for cingulum rest in natural teeth
the rest seat should not be over contoured
finish line
on the tooth
champfer, shoulder, bevel
margin
on crown
butt joint, metal collar, ceramo-metal margin
undercut- designing a survey crown for posterior teeth
typically in porcelain (for PFM crowns)
clasp tip 2-3mm coronal to gingival margin
depth and location of undercut is dependent on the clasp design and material used for the retentive arm of the clasp
special considerations for tooth preparation for survey crown
more reduction in the rest seat area may be needed to allow for sufficient thickness of the rest
cases with planned ledges, more reduction required to allow for fabrication of crown within normal contours
how much undercut does a c-clasp or I-bar need?
0.01mm
how much undercut does a ww-clasp?
0.02mm
what are the 3 techniques to retrofit a crown to an existing RPD?
pick up impression with the RPD seated firmly- a second impression without the RPD is required to be used for a master cast
chair-side clasp index using blue mousse (or any rigid bite registration material) and a final impression of the prepared tooth
digital workflow (CAD/CAM)- replicating the shape of the abutment tooth using a preop scan of tooth before the crown prep, a second scan of the prepped tooth is required
retrofitting a crown to existing RPD- pick up impression technique
pick up impression with the RPD seated firmly, a second impression without the RPD is required to be used for a master cast
most accurate technique
disadvantage- the pt will be without the RPD until the case is returned from the lab
retrofitting a crown to existing RPD- clasp index technique
chair-side clasp index using blue moose (or any rigid bite reg material), a final impression of the prepared tooth is needed too
advantage- pt will keep the RPD
disadvantage- more technique sensitive, typically requires more adjustments
retrofitting a crown to existing RPD- digital workflow (CAD/CAM)
replicating the shape of the abutment tooth using a preop scan of tooth before the crown prep, a second scan of the prepped tooth is required
advantages- accurate, less expensive
disadvantage- limitation of crown material (Zr or lithium disilicate)
*implant assisted RPD
first reported around 1991-1993
many descriptions- implant assisted RPD (IARPD), implant retained RPD (IRRPD), implant supported RPD (ISRPD)
beneficial in mandibular RPD’s with DE (K I and K II)
advantages and disadvantages of IARPD
improved support/retention, improved pt comfort, improved esthetics
requires surgery, cost, maintenance
attachment retained RPD
a mechanical device for the fixation, retention, and stabilization of a prosthesis
used for segmented bridges works and RPDs
2 components- matrix component (attached to crown), patrix component (attached to the pontic or the RPD)
advantages and disadvantages of ARRPD
esthetics
cost, maintenance due to wear, close monitoring required esp with DE RPDS
increased technical expertise by the clinician and technician
requires the pt to have adequate manual dexterity
how are attachments classified?
based on the contour of the attachment components- intra or extra coronal
based on the fit of matrix/patrix and the amount of movement- rigid, resilient
based on method of fabrication- precision, semi-precision
intra coronal attachment for attachment retained RPD
pre-fabricated or custom-made attachment for support and retention of a fixed or removable dental prosthesis; the matrix and patrix components are positioned within the normal contours of the abutment tooth
typically used for segmented fixed bridgework
extra coronal attachment for attachment retained RPD
pre-fabricated or custom-made attachment for support and retention of a fixed or removable dental prosthesis; the retentive components (matrix and patrix) are positioned outside the normal contours of the abutment tooth
allows for some rotation
rigid attachment for attachment retained RPD
non-resilient
provides stable, fixed connection between the matrix and patrix with no movement
prefab then soldered or cast to/with the prosthesis or castable resin pattern
indicated for segmented bridgework and tooth borne RPD’s
contraindicated for distal extension RPD
resilient attachment for attachment retained RPD
allows controlled movement between the matrix and patrix, vertical and/or rotational, to reduce stress on the abutment teeth (stress breaker)
can be used for distal extension RPD
ERA is an example
precision attachments for attachment retained RPD
prefabricated then cast-to or soldered
parallel walls
fit- approx 10 microns
semi- precision attachments for attachment retained RPD
wax pattern or resin pattern then cast in metal
tapered walls