1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Taste
Concept of Flavour (not just taste)
FLAVOUR INCLUDES:
Taste
Smell
Other nerve endings in the mouth
What are the tastes we perceive?
Sweet
Salt
Sour
Bitter
Umami (monosodium glutamate -MSG-savory)
How tastes are detected on the tongue?
Circumvallate papillae/cranial nerve IX
Foliate papilla
Fungiform papillae/cranial nerve VII
Epiglottis/cranial nerve X
Taste Bud
Taste molecules must dissolve in saliva
Individual receptor cells are chemoreceptors (Life span 10 days, renewable)
Different tastants are transduced by different kinds of channels (K+, Na+, second messengers):
Salt: Na+ influx;
Sour: H+ blocks K+ channel
Sweet: glucose or similar chemicals activates G-protein –cAMP – phosphorylation and blockage of K+
Bitter: more diverse tastants (e.g. alkaloids) – G-protein gustducin – inhibit phosphodiesterase – increase cAMP
Umami: triggered by amino acid, especially glutamate – G-protein – IP3 – Ca2+ release from internal store – activation of a monovalent-selective cation channel.
Type II Cell
Bitter, sweet, umami
T1R2/T1R3 or T2R (GPCR)
Increase cAMP
K+ channel closes → depolarization
CALHM1/3 releases ATP
P2X2/P2X3 (purinergic receptors)
Na+/Ca2+ influx → afferent excitation
Type III Cell
Sour + some salt
Sour: PKD2L1 (acid sensitive) → K+ channel closes → depolarization
Salt: ENaC (amiloride sensitive) → Na+ influx → depolarization
Serotonin (5-HT) ± GABA, ATP release via vesicular exocytosis
5-HT3 receptors
Na+/Ca2+ influx → afferent excitation
Type I Cell
Supportive (glial-like)
No direct taste transduction
Regulate extracellular milieu (e.g., K+ via Kir channels)
Cranial Nerves Conveying Taste
VII: ant. 2/3 of tongue, there may also be taste buds on the palate (roof of mouth)
IX: posterior 1/3 of tongue
X: a minor contribution, especially posteriorly around epiglottis
Labelled-line model of taste:
Implies that the activity in one neuron type is both necessary and sufficient to represent a given sensory modality
Taste receptor cells are generally tuned to a single taste modality, but their outputs converge onto shared gustatory afferent fibers, so individual taste sensory fibers carry mixed taste information
Across-fibre model 2 of taste:
Proposes that the pattern of responses to a particular stimulus across all fibers is the central feature of coding
Response of Individual fibers to Different Tastants:
Patterns of responses of sensory neurons in a population help discriminate tastes:
Not just connectivity (topography) but activity patterns within the population that help discriminate tastes
Coding of Taste – Population Coding
Not just connectivity (topography) but activity patterns within the population that help discriminate tastes
Taste receptor cells are generally tuned to a single taste modality, but their outputs converge onto shared gustatory afferent fibers, so individual taste sensory fibers carry mixed taste information
Patterns of neuronal activity appear to be more selective to tastes at ‘higher’ levels
Ageusia
no ability to taste
Dysgeusia
things taste odd (often bad)
Hypogeusia
diminished ability to taste
Clinical correlates of taste:
Trauma (CN VII and IX injury)
Chemotherapy (hypogeusia or dysgeusia)
Radiation therapy (damage to renewing taste receptor cells)
Decreased salivation (tastants must dissolve in saliva)
Olfaction
Sense of smell
Number of human olfactory receptor cells = 5 million
Number of dog olfactory receptor cells = 4 billion
Surface area of olfactory epithelium in humans = 10 cm2
Area of olfactory epithelium in some dogs = 170 cm2
Medical Doctors can utilize the sense of smell for diagnoses:
Infection after surgery from bacteria may smell like a wine cellar (musty)
Breath of a diabetic in coma smells like apples
Garlic smell can indicate arsenic poisoning
Location of the olfactory epithelium:
Below the olfactory bulb and cribriform plate
Olfactory receptor cells are primary sensory neurons that generate action potentials
Olfactory receptor neuron (ORN)
Olfactory receptor cells (neurons) have a life span of 30-60 days!
They fire APs → odor is first detected at cilia of olfactory receptor neuron
Use vesicular glutamate release at synapses,
Target well-defined second-order neurons in the CNS
Signal Transduction
Odorant → Golf –→ cAMP ↑ → open cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNG channels)

Odor Adaptation
The Ca2+ signal controls both excitation and adaptation:
Ca2+ -CAM binds to the CNG channel, reducing its affinity for CAMP
The extrusion of Ca2+ through the activation of Na+ /Ca2+ exchange proteins
Longer-lasting adaptation mechanisms (CO/cGMP, NO etc)
At receptor level → current detection in individual receptor cell is transient despite the continued presence of the odor
Coding at the ORN - Glomeruli
2004 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine to Linda Buck and Richard Axel for:
Their discoveries of odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system
1 receptor – 1 molecular feature
1 receptor – multiple odors sharing the same molecular feature
All receptors encoding the same molecular features – 1 glomerulus
1 odor activates several glomeruli
Different odors activate distinct patterns of glomeruli
Distinct patterns of glomeruli carry distinct odor information to the cortex (chemotopic odor map – basis to distinguish ~10,000 different odors)
Discovered a large gene family → 1000 genes (3% of our genes!) that give rise to an equivalent number of odorant receptors
Individual odor receptors expressing the same gene are dispersed throughout the olfactory epithelium but the axons of the receptors converge on 1 or 2 glomeruli in the olfactory bulb.

Olfactory Bulb Organization
In the olfactory bulb - glomeruli - these contain the 1st order neuron axons which carry information about one particular component of scent(s)
Separate components of an odour are separated into different glomeruli
These neurons then synapse on mitral cells --> refines the smell sense and relays it to the brain for further processing
Info goes from OB →
Cortical/subcortical route
Olfactory receptor neurons → olfactory bulb → lateral olfactory tract → primary olfactory areas: perception, discrimination, emotion, memory
Thalamo-cortical
Olfactory bulb → piriform cortex → mediodorsal thalamus → orbitofrontal cortex (OFC): conscious odor evaluation, multisensory integration, flavour
Orbitofrontal Cortex
integration of odour, taste, and reward
flavour perception
Primary Olfactory Cortex (Piriform Cortex)
conscious perception of odour
odour identification and discrimination
Amygdala
emotional and motivational aspects of odour
Hypothalamus
Autonomic and behavioural responses (e.g., feeding)
Entorhinal Cortex/Hippocampus
odour memory
contextual associations
How does the brain discriminate odors?
Olfaction also follows “population coding” as in taste
Activity patterns within the population that help discriminate tastes
Anosmia
near total loss of sense of smell
Hyposmia
diminished ability to smell many or some odors
Dysosmia
distorted sense of smell to some odors
Clinical correlates of olfaction:
Car accidents (head trauma) often lead to anosmia
Nasal polyps. Anosmia may be cured by surgery.
Flu/cold. Very often leads to short-lived anosmia
Unknown (idiopathic)
Brain tumor in temporal lobe. Rare, but can cause dysosmias.
Progressive diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s often decreases ability to detect and discriminate odors.
Covid-19 associated anosmia (often acute)
Vomeronasal organ (VNO)–accessory olfactory bulb pathways (pheromone detection):
Much more restricted (amygdala & hypothalamus) than the main olfactory system.
Vomeronasal/accessory bulb pathways in mammals are sexually dimorphic and likely involved in mating preferences.
Evidence for existence of VNO in humans is not so clear....but sexually dimorphic nuclei are present in olfactory related structures.
How does the olfactory system interact with the immune system?
There is evidence in animals that the immune system, via major histocompatibility (MHC) molecules, can leave a distinct odor in urine that can be detected by mice.
The mice will more likely mate with distantly related mice rather than closely related mice if confronted with multiple potential mates. This is a means to prevent the defects associated with in-breeding.
Could a similar unconscious mating scheme be working in humans? There is evidence that this is the case.
1995 Claus Wedekind “sweaty T-shirts” study