Supreme Court, Judicial Process, and Constitutional Law Vocabulary

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/93

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering judicial power, constitutional interpretation, decision-making theories, court procedures, selection, voting rights, and the First Amendment based on the exam study guide notes.

94 Terms

1
New cards

Judicial review

The power of courts to determine whether a law or government action is constitutional.

2
New cards

Article III

The part of the Constitution that establishes the federal judicial branch and defines its powers and jurisdiction.

3
New cards

Jurisdiction

A court’s legal authority to hear and decide a case.

4
New cards

Original jurisdiction

Authority to hear a case for the first time.

5
New cards

Appellate jurisdiction

Authority to review a decision made by a lower court.

6
New cards

Constitutional interpretation

The process of determining what the Constitution means and how it applies to a case.

7
New cards

Judicial authority

The power courts have to interpret and apply the law.

8
New cards

Judicial legitimacy

The public’s belief that courts have the right and authority to make decisions.

9
New cards

Implementation and enforcement

The process of putting court decisions into effect; courts often depend on other institutions to carry out their rulings.

10
New cards

Life tenure

Federal judges generally serve during “good Behaviour,” allowing them to remain in office without regular elections.

11
New cards

Textualism

Interpreting a law or constitutional provision based primarily on the meaning of its words.

12
New cards

Plain meaning

The ordinary meaning of the words used in a legal text.

13
New cards

Original intent

Interpreting the Constitution by considering what its authors intended when they wrote it.

14
New cards

Stare decisis

The principle that courts should generally follow precedent from earlier cases.

15
New cards

Precedent

An earlier court decision that guides how similar future cases should be decided.

16
New cards

Attitudinal model / attitudinalism

The theory that justices’ ideological and policy preferences strongly influence their decisions.

17
New cards

Behavioral approach

Studying judges’ actual behavior and decisions to understand how they make choices.

18
New cards

Strategic decision-making

The idea that justices consider how other justices, elected officials, or institutions may react to their choices.

19
New cards

Collegial decision-making

Decision-making among justices who must work with one another to reach outcomes and opinions.

20
New cards

Institutional constraints

Limits on judges’ choices, including legal rules, other justices, public opinion, Congress, and enforcement.

21
New cards

Disposition

The final result or resolution of a case.

22
New cards

Legal reasoning

The explanation and legal principles used to justify a court’s decision.

23
New cards

Overrule

To reject an earlier precedent and replace its legal rule.

24
New cards

Distinguish

To explain why an earlier case does not control because the facts or legal issues differ.

25
New cards

Limit

To narrow the circumstances in which an earlier precedent applies.

26
New cards

Expand

To extend a legal rule or precedent to cover additional circumstances.

27
New cards

Obiter dicta

Statements in a judicial opinion that are not necessary to decide the case; they may be persuasive but are not the holding.

28
New cards

Judicial policy preferences

The policy outcomes or ideological positions a justice tends to favor.

29
New cards

Tenth Amendment

Reserves powers not delegated to the federal government, nor prohibited to the states, to the states or the people.

30
New cards

Commerce Clause

Gives Congress power to regulate commerce among the states, with foreign nations, and with Native American tribes.

31
New cards

General Welfare Clause

Language in Article I that allows Congress to tax and spend for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.

32
New cards

Docket

The list of cases a court will consider.

33
New cards

Agenda-setting

The process through which the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear.

34
New cards

Writ of certiorari

An order through which the Supreme Court agrees to review a lower court’s decision.

35
New cards

Petition for certiorari

A request asking the Supreme Court to review a case.

36
New cards

Rule of Four

At least four of the nine justices must vote to accept a case for review.

37
New cards

Cert pool

A system in which law clerks from participating justices’ chambers share the work of reviewing petitions and preparing summaries.

38
New cards

Legal conflict

A disagreement between lower courts about how a law or constitutional provision should be interpreted.

39
New cards

Legal salience

The importance of a legal issue, such as its potential impact or significance beyond the individual case.

40
New cards

Oral argument

A public court session in which attorneys present arguments and answer justices’ questions.

41
New cards

Brief

A written legal argument submitted to a court.

42
New cards

In forma pauperis (IFP)

A procedure that allows qualifying people who cannot afford court costs to seek review without paying certain fees.

43
New cards

Standing

The requirement that a person bringing a case have a sufficient personal stake, generally including a concrete injury connected to the challenged action.

44
New cards

Ripeness

The requirement that a legal dispute be developed enough for a court to decide, rather than hypothetical or premature.

45
New cards

Mootness

When a dispute no longer presents a live controversy that a court can resolve, subject to recognized exceptions.

46
New cards

Political question doctrine

The principle that some issues are not appropriate for judicial resolution because the Constitution assigns them to other branches or they lack judicially manageable standards.

47
New cards

Grant, vacate, and remand (GVR)

A process in which the Supreme Court grants review, sets aside the lower court’s judgment, and sends the case back for reconsideration.

48
New cards

CVSG

“Call for the views of the Solicitor General”—the Court asks the U.S. Solicitor General to provide the federal government’s views on whether or how to consider a case.

49
New cards

Nomination

The president’s selection of a person to serve as a federal judge or Supreme Court justice.

50
New cards

Confirmation

The Senate’s approval of a judicial nominee.

51
New cards

Senate advice and consent

The Senate’s constitutional role in considering and approving presidential nominations.

52
New cards

Federalist No. 78

An essay by Alexander Hamilton defending the federal judiciary and judicial independence, including life tenure during good behavior.

53
New cards

Judicial independence

The ability of judges to make decisions without improper political pressure or fear of losing their positions.

54
New cards

Political ideology

A set of political beliefs that may shape a nominee’s views on constitutional interpretation and policy.

55
New cards

Senatorial courtesy

A political practice in which senators, especially those from a nominee’s home state, may influence consideration of lower-court nominees.

56
New cards

Blue slip

A Senate Judiciary Committee practice allowing home-state senators to express their views on certain judicial nominees; its effect depends on the chamber’s rules and leadership.

57
New cards

American Bar Association (ABA)

A professional legal organization that evaluates judicial nominees’ professional qualifications.

58
New cards

Majority opinion

The opinion expressing the reasoning supported by a majority of justices.

59
New cards

Concurrence

An opinion agreeing with the Court’s result but offering different or additional legal reasoning.

60
New cards

Dissent

An opinion disagreeing with the Court’s result or reasoning.

61
New cards

Per curiam opinion

An opinion issued in the name of the Court rather than a named justice.

62
New cards

Syllabus

A summary of the case and the Court’s decision provided at the beginning of a published opinion; it is not itself the Court’s binding opinion.

63
New cards

Opinion assignment

The process of choosing which justice will write the opinion for the Court or a separate opinion.

64
New cards

Majority coalition

The group of justices who agree on the result and, for a majority opinion, its controlling reasoning.

65
New cards

Join

To agree to sign onto another justice’s opinion.

66
New cards

Opinion bargaining

Negotiations among justices over the wording and reasoning of an opinion to secure support.

67
New cards

Judgment of the Court

The Court’s formal result in a case. Your notes distinguish this from a full opinion of the Court supported by five or more justices.

68
New cards

Equally divided vote

A tie among participating justices, often because of a vacancy or recusal; it generally leaves the lower court’s decision in place without establishing a Supreme Court precedent on the merits.

69
New cards

Precedential power

The extent to which a decision’s legal reasoning controls or guides future cases.

70
New cards

Judicial impact

The effects of a court decision on law, government policy, institutions, or society.

71
New cards

Fifteenth Amendment

Prohibits the federal government and states from denying or abridging voting rights on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

72
New cards

Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment

Gives Congress power to enforce the amendment through appropriate legislation.

73
New cards

Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA)

Federal law designed to combat racial discrimination in voting.

74
New cards

Section 2 of the VRA

A provision prohibiting voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race or membership in a language minority group. Your notes describe it as permanent and reactive.

75
New cards

Section 5 preclearance

A requirement that covered jurisdictions obtain approval before implementing certain voting changes. It was designed to prevent discriminatory changes before they took effect.

76
New cards

Section 4 coverage formula

The formula historically used to determine which jurisdictions were subject to Section 5 preclearance.

77
New cards

Preclearance

Advance review and approval of certain election-law changes before they can be implemented.

78
New cards

Reactive protection

A legal protection used to challenge a potentially discriminatory rule after it has been adopted or implemented.

79
New cards

Preemptive protection

A legal safeguard intended to stop discriminatory practices before they take effect.

80
New cards

Racial vote dilution

Election rules or districting arrangements that weaken a racial group’s ability to elect candidates of its choice.

81
New cards

Racial gerrymandering

The use of race in drawing electoral district boundaries, raising constitutional questions depending on the circumstances.

82
New cards

Election integrity

The goal of protecting elections against fraud, manipulation, or improper administration.

83
New cards

Equal access to voting

The principle that eligible voters should have a fair opportunity to participate in elections.

84
New cards

Equal sovereignty of states

The idea that states should generally be treated as equals within the federal system; it was central to the majority’s reasoning in Shelby County.

85
New cards

Out-of-precinct (OOP) ballot

A ballot submitted by a voter at a polling location outside the voter’s assigned precinct.

86
New cards

Ballot harvesting / ballot collection

The collection and delivery of completed ballots by someone other than the voter, subject to applicable laws.

87
New cards

First Amendment

Protects freedoms including speech, religion, the press, assembly, and petition.

88
New cards

Free speech

The constitutional protection for expression against certain forms of government restriction.

89
New cards

Content-based restriction

A government rule that regulates speech because of its subject matter or message. Such restrictions generally receive heightened constitutional scrutiny.

90
New cards

Citizen–government relationship

The relationship in which constitutional protections restrict what the government may do to individuals. This is the central relationship in most First Amendment claims.

91
New cards

Citizen–citizen relationship

Interactions between private individuals; constitutional speech restrictions generally concern government action, though other laws can govern private conduct.

92
New cards

Incitement

Speech that urges others toward unlawful action; under the test in Brandenburg v. Ohio, advocacy can be punished as incitement only when it meets a demanding standard.

93
New cards

Imminent lawless action test

Under Brandenburg, speech may be punished as incitement when it is directed to producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce it.

94
New cards

Off-campus speech

Student expression occurring away from school; Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. examines the limits of a public school’s authority over this speech.