1/149
Looks like no tags are added yet.
who was the philosopher behind virtue ethics
aristotle
most of his works are teasties which were thought to be lecture notes
who are the big 3 philosophers
aristotle
plato
socrates
define virtues and vices
strengths and weaknesses of character that operate to promote or hinder the development of personality
what does virtue ethics ask
what kind of person should I be
what is the purpose of virtue ethics
pursue virtues and avoid vices
contains aspects of character that pertain to personality
what does aristotle really think virtue is
a middle ground or balance between two extremes
ex: brutal honesty, dishonesty, and the middle ground of honesty
what is virtue ethics not
and act based ethics
its not about evaluating the ethics of a single behavior or action
doesnt determine if a person is ethical because of one action
what is virtue ethics about
the development of character over time
not something that you have but rather something that you do repeatedly
bullseye example
define virtues
personal qualities or traits that are shown through habitual action, that a person of excellent character demonstrate
aristotle specific definition
define habitual
ethos
custom/habit
describe the cycle of virtue ethics
virtuous actions lead to virtuous character which leads to virtuous actions
the repetition of virtuous actions develops a virtuous character and virutous character then becomes the source of virtuous actions
ex: learning to play the piano
define arete
often translated simply as virtue but is more nuanced
excellence: reaching the height of ones potential
is a greek word
define eudaemonia
happiness as a state of well being, flourishing, thriving
developing a virtuous character brings a good life
greek word
the end product or the result of having virtuistic character
has a karma aspect
doesnt mean good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people
more a sense of you can have a sense of fulfillment and accomplishment even if bad things happen to you
ex: people who took a stand for the civil rights movement
what are the two types of practical wisdom
sophia - rational, intellectual wisdom (book smart)
phronesis - practical wisdom, prudence (street smart)
what does sophia mean in greek
wisdom
what does philosophy mean
love of wisdom
philo = love
is wisdom situational or experiential
both!
mikes hard lemonade example
when do you use practical wisdom
to seek moderation (the golden mean) which leads to fulfillment (eudomonia)
describe phronesis as a skill
a skill we use that is situational and experiential
can vary based on characteristics of situation (can tailor ethics to each) and wisdom informed by experience
a skill we can develop
according to aristotle what are our biggest experiences
education
training
discression
what is the golden mean
all virtues are means between excess and deficiency
middle ground or balance between two means
avoiding extremes
this is the closest we get to a formula for virtue ethics
the virtue - the two extremes are the vices
is everyones golden mean the same
no
its dependent on personality and background
what are the strengths of virtue ethics
introspective - challenges us to develop our character!!!!!!!!
allows for mistakes
what are the criticisms of virtue ethics
limited for problem solving (nothing to say about large social issues)
sometimes there no middle ground
the notion that happiness will result from ethical behavior may be somewhat naive
potential ethical class bias
what do we associate with middle class bias
a lot of the things we consider to be good
what does introspection allow for
the biggest self growth
how to apply virtue ethics
which virtues are relevant to the situation and will allow me to become the ideal person/professional
how can I use practical wisdom and the golden mean
what decision will most allow me to demonstrate these virtues and exemplify the golden mean
what is stoicism and hedonism
we arent in control of our lives, just living out something that a higher power already has planned out
if it doesnt go to plan
stoicism - just acccepts it and doesnt have emotions about it
hedonism - have as much fun as you can
what do stoicism and hedonism do
they emphasize a way to respond to predestined or fatalistic world
fantasy or destiny
what is stoicism
philosophers are zeno and epitetus
remaining indifferent to external circumstances
virtue consists of learning to accept whatever happens
what is hedonsim
philosopher epicurus
YOLO
the ultimate goal of life is the pursuit of pleasure
define epicurianism
pleasure as tranquility and avoidance of pain
what kind of ethics are stoicism and hedonism
greek ethics
what are stoicism and hedonism not
used to solve moral dilemmas in calss
not related to egoism ethics, they are their own thing
what is psychological egoism
all behavior, even those seemingly altruistic, is motivated by self interest
not an ethic
what is altruism
unselfish concern for the welfare of others, doing good deeds for nothing in return
what is ethical egoism
the only ethical duty is to promote ones own well being
ethical courses of action are determined based on self interest
who is the philosopher behind psychological egoism
hobbes
characteristics of psychological egoism
descriptive
how everyone does behave
characteristics of ethical egoism
normative
how everyone should behave
who is the philosopher behind ethical egoism
ayn rand
what does psychological egoism say
all people only ever behave in ways they think will benefit themselves
there is a sense of reciprocity - you do things for people and then there is a debt they may have to pay back
what does ethical egoism say
you can be altruistic but you shouldnt
only act in your own self interest/benefit
doing whats best for you
rational way to behave, will produce most rational world
what are the critiques of egoism
selfishness is normally considered to be unethical
could be breaking the law/rules if it benefitted the individual
egoism is inconsistent with public service
define self interest
preservation of the self
define selfishness
obsessed with the well being of the self with limited or no consideration for the well being of others
how to apply egoism
what act would most benefit me
how will my self interest be promoted
the most ethical action is that which is best for me
who is the psychologist behind ethics of care
carol gilligan
she worked under kohlberg and his stages of moral development
she wrote “in a different voice: psychological theory and womens development”
what were kohlbergs stages of moral development
preconventional - needs of the self are prioritized (obidience and punishment)
conventional - morality is shaped by understanding of becoming a member of society (social expectation and legal obligation)
postconventional - abstract and internalized notions of morality and justice
what were gilligans stages of moral development
pre conventional - needs of self are prioritized
conventional - morality is about non violent care (not harming others) and balance between needs of others and needs of self
where did gilligan conduct her research
outside of an abortion clinic and interviewed women
her focus was on women
what are the feminist critiques of ethical theory
assumed individuals make ethicals decisions independently
emphasizes impartiality and universality in thinking
how does ethics of care change between a patriarchal society and democratic society
patriarchal
ethics of care is feminist
there is the standard that men and women have different ethics and the mens are better - your job is to argue there is no supremacy and that both are important for everyone
democratic
ethics are representative for everyone in society
what are some masculine values
right
justice
independence
reason
impartial
strength
leadership
protection
what are some feminine values
care
responsibility
relational
emotion
situational
gentleness
support
nurture
human virutes
right justice care responsibility reason emotional strength gentleness leadership support
what is restorative justice
restoring or repairing the harm done to all parties via the crime
restoration to victim, community, and offender
offenders obligated to make amends
collaborative healing for all involved
what is the process of restorative justice
involves all parties or representative of each party along with a mediator to come up with a plan to fix the problems and have the offender take accountability
consent is needed from all parties
what is argued about restorative justice
it isnt for more serious issues
it doesnt give justice to victims
research shows that victims feel more satisfied with this compared to other forms of justice
what are the 3 components of caring
attentiveness
responsibility
responsiveness
define attentiveness
recognition of relationships and needs of those with whom we interact
define responsibility
recognition of an obligation to relationships
define responsiveness
actoin taken to address the needs of those with whom we are in a relationship with
define care
look out after someone or somethings, meeting the needs and how you do that
particularly because you love them or its in an emotionally sensitive way
what are the strengths of ethics of care
combats gender stereotypes in ethics
centers relationships in ethical decision making
what are the criticisms of ethics of care
how does an ethic of care inform us as to the ethical treatment of strangers
provides little guidance on the moral or ethical way to care
how are concepts of justice and care complimentary and or contradictory
response to ethics of care and strangers
you dont need an intimate relationship with someone for ethics of care but it most likely prioritized
response to ethics of care and concepts of justice
both complementary and contradictory
victim and rehabilitation could be viewed as care while the other goals of punishment could be viewed as contradictory
juvenile vs adult system
applying ethics of care
identify all relationships involved
identify the option for resolution that minimizes harm and is most attentive, responsible, and responsive to the relationships involved
what is justice
rights and responsibilities, fairness, and standards
define rights
human rights, constitutional rights, and due process rights
define responsibilities
the responsibility to respect rights, stand ip for rights violations for others, responsibility to other nations and people
define standards
the source or basis for justice
codes of law, religion, morality, whats the reason we need to be just, where we can find what justice looks like
what are 3 justice related themes
equality
fairness
impartiality
what is equality
treating everyone the same - the absence of avoidable differences
sometimes its fair and other times if unfair
ex: splitting a pizza
what is fairness
responding to people and situations based on what is deserved or needed
hard to define but easy to feel
central concept to justice
different from equality
what is impartiality
decisions should be made, particularly, criminal justice decisions, based only on those things that are relevant to punishment
blind justice, whether one is poor or rich, black or white, man or woman
is equality always justice
no
fence and box example
track without staggered start lines example
what are the types of justice
distributive
corrective
substantive
procedural
define distributive justice
the just distribution of resources of society
the one that the benefits and burdens of society are distributed justly
characteristics of distributive justice
emphasizes the burdens and unavoidable benefits of society to the poor and marginalized groups
when life is harder for one group in society simply because they beong to that group (women, african americans, lgbt, immigrants) its unjust
aka social justice
what are societal resources
healthcare
education
jobs
what are the 2 justifications for the attribution of resources
desert (merit) - resources go to those who deserved them, they worked for them, skill and effort based
ex: scholarships
need based - resources go to those who need them
ex: financial aid
who was john rawls
philosopher who taught at harvard for 40 years
made a theory of justice
distributive justice focus!
veil of ignorance
what did john rawls think
moral luck (privilege, inheritance, social status) created injustice and reduces fairness
gives certain people advantage when it comes to resources and resource distribution
the things we get by luck should not determine what share of resources we get
privilege, inheritance, social status, parents
what are the 2 principles of social justice
liberty
difference
what is the liberty principle
each person has equal right to basic liberties
what is the difference principle
inequalities must be designed to benefit the least advantages members of society
what did rawls argue
a just society is one that is created by people in the original position - the veil of ignorance
distribution of resources should be decided on decisions of people when they have no idea what position they hold in society
how does the veil of ignorance work
no one knows if they are rich or poor
equality should be strived for but any inequalities must benefit the least advantages members of society
if we distribute goods unequally they should be designed to go to the poorest members of society
how do CJ professionals deal with issues of distributive justice in their professions
must distribute their talents and services fairly
must enforce laws of society concerning distribution
right to private property, enforce laws against stealing
prevent it, detect it, enforce it, punish it, recover it, recompensate it
who does the distribution of resources in society have an impact on
who commits the crime
who is targeted by the CJ system
who has the resources to navigate the CJ procedure
how should justice be distributed
justly
if one group isnt achieving justice from the CJ system (or is receiving unjust treatment) we need to rethink how to distribute it
distribution of wealth education, opportunity, and their impact of criminal offending and distribution of justice
areas of concentrated disadvantage
poor african americans, single parent families, poverty, social isolation
structural conditions to those areas, poverty, anonymity, and street culture breed crime and violence
how does CJ action and enforcement differ in society
its disproportionate against the poor
why do people without education, money, or opportunity have little to offer in way of their defense
have strong social networks to provide support during CJ process
dont have capacity to get bailed out of jail
dont have resources to hire and attorney, questions as to adequacy of public defense
what are reasons for racial disproportionality in the CJ system
differential involvement (distributive justice issues) - increased offending by racial minorities
disparity in the CJ system - theoretical colorblind policies that have racially different impacts
discrimination in the CJ system - overt bigotry and implicit bias
define disproportionality
we see a greater percent of a demographic in CJ settings than general population
US pop is 15% black but prison pop was 45% black
differential involvement, disparity, and discrimination explain this