1/25
AMTA Mock Trial Rules of Evidence 26/27
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
401
Standard for relevant evidence:
has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable
the fact is of consequence in determining the action
402
Relevant evidence is admissible unless an exception under US or Midlands says so
403
Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is significantly outweighed by prejudice, confusing the issue, misleading the jury, wasting time, etc.
404(a) (1)
Character evidence is not admissible to be used as proof that a person acted according to that trait/pattern of behavior
404(b)
(1) Evidence of a crime, wrong, or other act is NOT ADMISSIBLE to prove a
person’s character to show they acted in that manner in this instance
(2) This evidence MAY BE admissible for another purpose, such as proving motive, opportunity, etc.
405(a)
Methods of proving character— can prove through testimony of a person’s reputation
405(b)
Methods of proving character— character or a character trait can be proved by relevant specific instances of conduct
406
Routine Practice— Evidence of a person’s habit or an organization’s routine practice can be evidence they acted according to that in a specific scenario. This can be admitted regardless of if corroborated or if there’s no eyewitness.
407
Subsequent Remedial Measures
When measures are taken after an incident to prevent another, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove: negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in a product or its design, or a need for a warning or instruction.
BUT the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as impeachment or – if disputed – proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures.
408
Compromise offers— can’t admit evidence of a party being willing to settle/compromise to prove/disprove the validity of a certain claim
409
Offering to pay medical expenses— cannot be used as evidence/admission of guilt, doesn’t prove liability
411
Liability insurance— the fact of a person being insured/not insured for liability can’t be used to prove someone acted negligently or wrongly
601
Everyone is competent to testify for trial (unless a certain rule says otherwise)
602
Personal knowledge (need for/lack of)
608(a)
Reputation or opinion— another witness can attack reputation for being dishonest (if no rebuttal witness, WRIT NOT must be provided)
608(b)
Specific acts of dishonesty— if it comes up naturally, fine, but you can’t call one witness to testify about one singular act of dishonesty/for the purpose of proving dishonesty rather than overall character
611(b)
Beyond the scope of re-direct/re-cross
611(c)
Leading
612
Writing can be used to refresh memory
701
opinion testimony by lay witnesses must be based on rational perceptions of the witness, must be helpful to determining a fact, and can’t be based on specialized knowledge
702
testimony by expert witness
704(a)
testimony in the form of opinion or inference is not objectionable just because it embraces the ultimate issue
705
experts can state opinions without first testifying to underlying facts or data. required to disclose if asked on cross though
801(d)(2)
An Opposing Party’s Statement. The statement is offered against an opposing party
and:
(A) was made by the party in an individual or representative capacity;
(B) is one the party manifested that it adopted or believed to be true;
(C) was made by a person whom the party authorized to make a statement on the
subject;
(D) was made by the party’s agent or employee on a matter within the scope of that
relationship and while it existed; or
(E) was made by the party’s coconspirator during and in furtherance of the
conspiracy.
803
Hearsay exceptions:
Present sense impression
excited utterance
Then existing mental, emotional or physical condition c
Statement made for medical diagnosis or treatment
Recorded recollection
records of regularly conducted activity
absence of a record of regularly conducted activity
Public records
public records of vital statistics
absence of public record
records of religious organizations concerning family history
certificates of marriage, baptism, etc
family records
records of documents that affect an interest in property
statements of documents that affect an interest in property
statements in ancient documents
market reports/commercial publications
statements in treaties, periodicals, pamphlets
reputation concerning personal or family history
reputation concerning boundaries or general history
reputation concerning character
judgement of a previous conviction
Judgments Involving Personal, Family, or General History, or a Boundary.
805
Hearsay within hearsay.