1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
~ Privacy
~ Data Protection
~ European Data Protection Board
~ GDPR
“personvern”
data protection
~ Westin’s privacy typology
Solitude, intimacy, anonymity, reserve
~ Orla Lynskey’s three models
Complementary to "human dignity"?
Data protection as privacy?
Data protection as a separate right?
~ CIA-model
Confidentiality, integritety, accountability/availability (including transperency)
Joined cases C-465/00, C-138/01 and C-139/01 - protecting fundamental rights
“so far as they govern the processing of personal data liable to infringe fundamental freedoms, in particular the right to privacy, must necessarily be interpreted in the light of fundamental rights”
“If the national courts conclude that the national legislation at issue is incompatible with Article 8 of the Convention, that legislation is also incapable of satisfying the requirement of proportionality in Articles 6(1)(c) and 7(c) or (e) of Directive 95/46”
Regulation 2018/1725
GDPR for EU institutions
~ EDPS/European Data Protection Supervisor
2002/58: article 13
unsolicted communcations by automated calling, including e-mail, are only permitted based on prior consent
2002/58: article 5 (3)
The cookie rule. Information capsules are only permitted based on clear and comprehensive information and the right to refuse.
~ Processor
~ Controller
~ Schengen
~ OECD Principles
collection limitation
data quality
purpose specification
use limitation
security safeguard
openness
individual participation
accountability
~ infringement
~ positive obligation
~ principle of proportionality
ICCPR Article 17
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondance, nor to unlawful attacks upon his honour and reputation.
Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
UDHR Article 12
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, now to attacks upon his hour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Amann v. switzerland. Right to privacy, article 8
The term prixcite life must not be interpreted too restrictively. Does not exclude activities of a professional or business nature