1/43
Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering English transition words and cohesive devices across functional categories: adding information, emphasizing, giving examples, comparing, defining/clarifying, sequencing events, cause and effect, and contradicting.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Also
An 'Add information' transition used to naturally add information and connect two characteristics of a subject (e.g., "She is a talented musician. Also, she writes her own songs.").
Furthermore
A formal 'Add information' transition that introduces an additional strong argument to reinforce a preceding point (e.g., "The project is too expensive. Furthermore, it will take too long.").
In addition
An 'Add information' transition that clarifies that the following detail provides added value alongside an established fact (e.g., "He speaks fluent French. In addition, he knows basic German.").
Moreover
An 'Add information' transition that highlights another significant advantage, making the overall argument more persuasive (e.g., "The car is affordable. Moreover, it is very safe.").
In fact
An 'Emphasize' transition that turns the following clause into proof or raises it to a higher degree to reinforce the preceding statement (e.g., "It was cold yesterday. In fact, it was freezing.").
Indeed
An 'Emphasize' transition that affirms the truth or correctness of the preceding statement, solidifying praise or an evaluation (e.g., "He is a great leader. Indeed, he inspired the whole team.").
For example
A 'Give Example' transition immediately indicating that the following statement serves as specific proof for a general claim (e.g., "I love pets. For example, I have two dogs and a cat.").
For instance
A 'Give Example' transition similar to 'for example' that narrows down a broad category to a specific instance (e.g., from 'many animals' down to 'pandas': "Many animals are endangered. For instance, pandas are losing their habitat.").
Specifically
A 'Give Example' transition that gets directly to the core details, eliminating the ambiguity of a general term (e.g., clarifying 'supplies': "We need more supplies. Specifically, we need paper and pens.").
Likewise
A 'Compare' transition that establishes a comparative link showing that two subjects share the same quality or action (e.g., "She works very hard. Likewise, her brother is very diligent.").
Similarly
A 'Compare' transition signaling to the reader that the principle or rule in the preceding clause applies analogously to the subsequent clause (e.g., "Dogs need daily exercise. Similarly, cats need playtime.").
Fittingly
A 'Compare' transition indicating that the following action is an entirely deserved, appropriate reward or outcome matching the preceding event (e.g., "He won the championship. Fittingly, he was given a gold medal.").
Effectively
A 'Define, Clarify' transition that emphasizes practical, real-world results on the ground, even if not official in name or title (e.g., "The CEO is rarely there. Effectively, the manager runs the company.").
Essentially
A 'Define, Clarify' transition that summarizes the core essence of a thing or concept to make it easier to understand (e.g., "It is a smartphone. Essentially, it is a mini computer.").
In other words
A 'Define, Clarify' transition that restates the same concept using different wording, typically in a more straightforward or simpler manner (e.g., "He didn't pass the exam. In other words, he failed.").
That is
A 'Define, Clarify' transition used to clarify, specify, or correct precise information (such as dates) to prevent misunderstanding (e.g., "We leave tomorrow. That is, we leave on Tuesday.").
Previously
A 'Sequence of Events' transition that explicitly establishes a past time milestone in contrast to the present (e.g., "I work here now. Previously, I worked at Google.").
Subsequently
A 'Sequence of Events' transition signaling an action that occurs directly following the aftermath or consequence of a previous action (e.g., "He was fired. Subsequently, he sued the company.").
Finally
A 'Sequence of Events' transition conveying a sense of anticipation and marking the conclusion of an extended sequence of events (e.g., "We waited for hours. Finally, the train arrived.").
Ultimately
A 'Sequence of Events' transition emphasizing a final, definitive decision or outcome reached after extensive deliberation (e.g., "We tried many plans. Ultimately, we canceled the event.").
Accordingly
A 'Cause and Effect' transition expressing compliance, showing that the subsequent action is taken to respond or adapt to the preceding reason (e.g., "The rules changed. Accordingly, we updated our policy.").
As a result
A 'Cause and Effect' transition explicitly presenting the direct consequence of the preceding event (e.g., "It rained heavily. As a result, the streets flooded.").
As such
A 'Cause and Effect' transition linking clauses based on status or role: because someone holds that capacity, it leads to that specific authority or action (e.g., "He is the manager. As such, he makes the final decisions.").
Consequently
A 'Cause and Effect' transition similar to 'As a result' that builds a tight logical link between a cause and its inevitable consequence (e.g., "She missed the bus. Consequently, she was late for work.").
Hence
A 'Cause and Effect' transition connecting logical deductions and explaining the rationale behind a decision made in the following clause (e.g., "The company is growing. Hence, we need more staff.").
Thus
A formal and academic 'Cause and Effect' transition connecting a cause to its inevitable logical consequence (e.g., "He didn't study at all. Thus, he failed the test.").
Therefore
A 'Cause and Effect' transition presenting a mandatory logical deduction or conclusion dictated by a given set of circumstances (e.g., "The bridge is broken. Therefore, we must take a detour.").
To this end
A 'Cause and Effect' transition clarifying that the action in the subsequent clause is carried out specifically to achieve the 'purpose' stated in the preceding clause (e.g., "We want to increase sales. To this end, we launched a new ad campaign.").
Alternatively
A 'Contradict' transition introducing a substitute choice (Option B) presented alongside Option A (e.g., "We can go by car. Alternatively, we can take the train.").
Conversely
A 'Contradict' transition emphasizing a complete reversal of traits or characteristics between two statements (e.g., "Northern regions are cold. Conversely, southern regions are warm.").
Even so
A 'Contradict' transition expressing concession: acknowledging a situation while introducing an unexpected or contradictory result (e.g., "The car is old. Even so, it runs perfectly.").
However
A standard 'Contradict' transition that shifts the line of thought by introducing an obstacle or opposing factor (e.g., "I love ice cream. However, I am lactose intolerant.").
In any case
A 'Contradict' transition setting aside the obstacle mentioned previously to affirm that the subsequent action will occur regardless of conditions (e.g., "It might rain. In any case, we will go hiking.").
In contrast
A 'Contradict' transition juxtaposing two subjects side-by-side to highlight the prominent distinction between them (e.g., "The city is loud. In contrast, the countryside is quiet.").
Instead
A 'Contradict' transition negating the earlier option and substituting it with the choice presented in the subsequent clause (e.g., "I didn't buy the red shirt. Instead, I bought the blue one.").
Meanwhile
A 'Contradict' transition describing two simultaneous actions—often contrasting in nature—taking place at the same time (e.g., "He was studying. Meanwhile, his friends were playing.").
Nevertheless
A formal 'Contradict' transition (more formal than 'However') emphasizing perseverance and effort in overcoming adversity (e.g., "The test was extremely hard. Nevertheless, she scored 100%.").
Nonetheless
A 'Contradict' transition similar to 'Nevertheless' indicating that an action proceeds despite adverse conditions (e.g., "It was pouring rain. Nonetheless, we went for a walk.").
On the contrary
A 'Contradict' transition that completely refutes a prior assumption and asserts an entirely opposite reality (e.g., "I don't hate you. On the contrary, I really like you.").
On the other hand
A 'Contradict' transition presenting a different perspective on the same subject to offer a multi-dimensional assessment, such as pros vs. cons (e.g., "City life is exciting. On the other hand, it is very expensive.").
Otherwise
A 'Contradict' transition stating a hypothetical negative outcome if the preceding action is not carried out ('if not') (e.g., "We must hurry up. Otherwise, we will miss the flight.").
Rather
A 'Contradict' transition used to correct or clarify the truth, typically placed after a negative statement (e.g., "He didn't quit his job. Rather, he was fired.").
Regardless
A 'Contradict' transition that disregards an impeding factor, showing that the event carries on regardless (e.g., "The weather was bad. Regardless, we decided to go out.").
Still
A 'Contradict' transition creating a mild contrast, conveying surprise that despite adequate conditions, the outcome is unsatisfactory or unexpected (e.g., "He is very wealthy. Still, he is unhappy.").