Civil Procedure Attack Outline UBE

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/43

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering the Civil Procedure Attack Outline UBE, including personal and subject-matter jurisdiction, venue, service of process, Erie doctrine, pleadings, joinder, pretrial motions, discovery, trials, and preclusion doctrines.

44 Terms

1
New cards

Personal Jurisdiction

The power of a court to hear a case over a particular person, arising from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

2
New cards

General Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction allowing a defendant to be sued in the state for acts committed generally, established through consent, presence, or domicile (mnemonic = CPD).

3
New cards

Corporate Domicile (General Jurisdiction)

The state in which a corporation is incorporated and the state where its principal place of business (corporate headquarters) is located, giving it 22 domiciles.

4
New cards

Specific Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction that exists when a lawsuit arises out of the defendant's contacts with the forum state, requiring authorization by a state long-arm statute and satisfaction of constitutional minimum contacts that do not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.

5
New cards

Direct Attack

A challenge to personal jurisdiction raised before judgment where the defendant appears in the original action to object.

6
New cards

Collateral Attack

A challenge to personal jurisdiction raised after judgment where the defendant ignores the lawsuit and challenges jurisdiction when the plaintiff attempts to enforce a default judgment.

7
New cards

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction

The power of a court to hear a certain type of case, which can never be waived and may be raised by the parties or policed by the court sua sponte at any time.

8
New cards

Federal-Question Jurisdiction

Subject-matter jurisdiction over claims that arise under federal law or a state law raising a substantial federal question, which must appear on the face of the plaintiff's well-pleaded complaint.

9
New cards

Diversity Jurisdiction

Subject-matter jurisdiction requiring complete diversity between the parties (no plaintiff is from the same state as any defendant based on domicile) and an amount in controversy exceeding textdollar75,000\\text{dollar}75,000.

10
New cards

Supplemental Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction permitting a federal court to hear additional state-law claims that arise from a common nucleus of operative fact with a claim having an independent jurisdictional basis, except that a plaintiff cannot use it against a non-diverse party when the primary basis is diversity.

11
New cards

Removal

The transfer of an action by defendants from state court to the federal court that geographically embraces it, provided all defendants agree and the case could have initially been filed in federal court.

12
New cards

Home-State Defendant Rule (Removal)

An exception barring removal if the defendant is sued in their home state and the sole basis for federal jurisdiction is diversity.

13
New cards

Remand

A procedure to send a case back to state court; motions based on procedural defects must be filed within 30 days30\text{ days} after removal, while motions for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction can be made at any time.

14
New cards

Venue

The statutory requirement determining the proper court to hear a case among courts having jurisdiction; proper in any district where any defendant resides if all reside in the same state, or where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.

15
New cards

Transfer to a Proper Venue

The dismissal or transfer of a case filed in the wrong venue to a federal court where it could have been brought under the venue statutes; the law of the transferee court applies.

16
New cards

Transfer to a More Appropriate Forum

The transfer of a case from a proper venue to another federal district for the convenience of parties and witnesses, and in the interest of justice; the law of the transferor court applies even if initiated by the plaintiff.

17
New cards

Service of Process on an Individual (SAID)

Methods to serve an individual under federal rules: State law methods, Agent delivery, Individual personal delivery, or Dwelling/usual place of abode delivery to someone of suitable age and discretion residing there.

18
New cards

Erie Doctrine

The principle that a federal court presiding over diversity or supplemental jurisdiction claims must apply federal procedural law and state substantive law (including outcome-determinative rules).

19
New cards

Amendment as a Matter of Course

The right to amend a pleading once without leave of court no later than 21 days21\text{ days} after serving the pleading, responsive pleading, or pre-answer motion.

20
New cards

Relation Back

A doctrine allowing new claims in an amended pleading to be treated as filed on the date of the original pleading if they derive from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence.

21
New cards

Compulsory Counterclaim (Rule 13(a))

A claim brought by a defendant against an opposing plaintiff that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the opposing claim; it must be asserted or it is waived.

22
New cards

Crossclaim (Rule 13(g))

A claim asserted by one party against a co-party that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence as the original action or a counterclaim; it is never compulsory.

23
New cards

Impleader (Rule 14(a))

A procedure enabling a defending party to join a third party who may be liable to the defendant for all or part of any recovery the plaintiff obtains.

24
New cards

100-Mile100\text{-Mile} Bulge Rule

A rule establishing personal jurisdiction over a third-party defendant (or joined necessary party) if served within 100 miles100\text{ miles} of the courthouse where the action is pending.

25
New cards

Interpleader (Rule 22)

A joinder device allowing a stakeholder/property holder to join all claimants in one action to avoid double liability, requiring minimal diversity and an amount of at least textdollar500\\text{dollar}500.

26
New cards

Intervention (Rule 24)

A procedure allowing a nonparty with an interest to timely move to enter a lawsuit, either as a matter of right (interest impaired and inadequately represented) or permissively (common question of law or fact).

27
New cards

Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss

A dispositive motion asserting that even if every factual allegation in the complaint is true, there is no violation of any legal rights; can be raised at any time before or at trial before a verdict.

28
New cards

Summary Judgment (Rule 56)

A dispositive motion granted when the moving party shows there is no genuine issue of material fact and they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

29
New cards

Preliminary Injunction

Equitable relief aimed at preserving the status quo requiring notice to the adverse party, evaluated under the HELP factors: Harm (irreparable injury), Evaluate risk, Likelihood of prevailing, and Public interest.

30
New cards

Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)

A stopgap emergency order lasting up to 14 days14\text{ days} that can be issued without notice to prevent immediate and irreparable harm until a preliminary injunction hearing.

31
New cards

Class Action Prerequisites (CANTS)

The four required Rule 23(a) elements plus superiority: Commonality, Adequacy of representation, Numerosity (classes of 4040 are sufficient), Typicality, and Superiority (for common question class actions).

32
New cards

Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA)

A federal statute conferring jurisdiction over class actions with 100100 or more plaintiffs seeking over textdollar5 million\\text{dollar}5\text{ million} where minimal diversity exists.

33
New cards

Initial Disclosures (DISS)

Mandatory disclosures required within 14 days14\text{ days} after the Rule 26(f) conference: Damages computation, Insurance agreements, Supporting witnesses, and Supporting documents.

34
New cards

Rule 11 Sanctions

Penalties imposed when a signed paper presented to the court is submitted for an improper purpose, is frivolous, or lacks factual or evidentiary support.

35
New cards

Two-Dismissal Rule

The rule providing that while a plaintiff's first voluntary dismissal is without prejudice, a second voluntary dismissal of the same claim operates as an adjudication with prejudice.

36
New cards

Seventh Amendment Jury Trial Right

The constitutional guarantee preserving the right to a jury trial in civil suits at common law where the amount in controversy exceeds textdollar20\\text{dollar}20, requiring a written demand within 14 days14\text{ days} after service of the last pleading.

37
New cards

Peremptory Challenges

Requests allowing each side to strike up to 33 potential jurors during jury selection for any reason, except on the basis of race or gender.

38
New cards

Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL)

A motion made during a jury trial before submission to the jury, granted if there is no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the nonmoving party.

39
New cards

Renewed Motion for JMOL

A post-trial motion filed within 28 days28\text{ days} of entry of judgment challenging the legal sufficiency of the evidence, permitted only if the party previously made a motion for JMOL during trial.

40
New cards

Collateral Order Doctrine

An exception to the final judgment rule permitting immediate appeal of orders resolving issues completely separate from the merits that are effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.

41
New cards

Claim Preclusion (Res Judicata)

A doctrine barring relitigation of a claim when there is the Same claim (transaction or occurrence test), Same parties or privity, a Final judgment, and an Outcome on the merits (mnemonic = SSFO).

42
New cards

Issue Preclusion (Collateral Estoppel)

A doctrine barring relitigation of a specific issue when it involves the Same issue, Actually litigated, Actually decided, and Necessary to the court's judgment (mnemonic = SAAN).

43
New cards

Defensive Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel

The use of issue preclusion as a shield by a new defendant to prevent a plaintiff from relitigating an issue that the plaintiff previously litigated and lost against another defendant.

44
New cards

Offensive Nonmutual Collateral Estoppel

The use of issue preclusion as a sword by a new plaintiff to prevent a defendant from relitigating an issue that the defendant previously litigated and lost against another plaintiff.