Presentation 5: Platform pricing and monetization

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Platform launch, monetization and value

Last updated 4:57 PM on 7/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

21 Terms

1
New cards

Explain the Normal Demand Curve.

  • Profit/Revenue: Prie x Quantity

  • Consumer Surplus (CS) (Überschuss):

    • Value of the purchase beyond the price

    • Willingness of consumers to pay more

→ Difference between willing to pay and actually pay (e.g max willingness:100€; actual price: 70€ → CS: 30€)

  • Deadweight Loss (DWL):

    • Opportunity Costs

    • Consumers priced out by the product

→ Some customers would have bought the product at €60 but not at €70 (Those trades never happen → loss of value called DWL)

Normal Demand Curve (Optimized one product):

  • If the price is

    • too high → high margin but few customers.

    • too low → many customers but little money per customer.

    The optimum is somewhere in the middle

<ul><li><p>Profit/Revenue: Prie x Quantity</p></li><li><p>Consumer Surplus (CS) (Überschuss):</p><ul><li><p>Value of the purchase beyond the price</p></li><li><p>Willingness of consumers to pay more</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>→ Difference between willing to pay and actually pay (e.g max willingness:100€; actual price: 70€ → CS: 30€)</p><ul><li><p>Deadweight Loss (DWL):</p><ul><li><p>Opportunity Costs</p></li><li><p>Consumers priced out by the product</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>→ Some customers would have bought the product at €60 but not at €70 (Those trades never happen → loss of value called DWL)</p><p></p><p><strong>Normal Demand Curve (Optimized one product):</strong></p><ul><li><p>If the price is</p><ul><li><p>too high → high margin but few customers.</p></li><li><p>too low → many customers but little money per customer.</p></li></ul><p>The optimum is somewhere in the middle</p></li></ul><p></p>
2
New cards

Explain the Interdependent Demand Curve and the Interdependent Demand Curve Collectively.

Iterdependent Demand Curve (Optimized one side of a platform):

  • Two-sided platform

  • Consumer demand is influenced by the number of developers (apps), and developer demand is influenced by the number of consumers

  • Optimize only one side

Interdependent Demand Curve Collectively (optimized entire platform):

  • Two-sided platform

  • Platform owner optimizes both sides together

  • May subsidize one side to maximize total platform profit

  • Uses cross-side network effects

→ Platforms should not optimize each market separately

→ Because of cross-side network effects, the best decision for one side (e.g., maximizing Mac profits) is not necessarily the best decision for the entire platform ecosystem.

3
New cards

What is the difference between pricing a traditional product and pricing a two-sided platform?

Traditional product:

  • One demand curve

  • Optimize the price of one product

  • Goal: maximize the profit of the product

  • no (or few) network effects and no subsidies

Two-sided platfoms:

  • Two interdependent demand curves

  • Optimize prices on both sides

  • Goal: maximize the total platform profit

  • Strong cross-side network effects

  • Often subsidize one side to attract the other

4
New cards

Name and explain pricing strategies.

Symmetric Pricing:

  • Make money on (or subsidize) both consumers and complementors side

  • Subsidy = Price does not cover the platform cost

  • e.g. amazon: consumers pay price and complementors pay fees

  • e.g. Uber (2014-2017): consumers and complementors were subsidized

Asymmetric Pricing:

  • Make money on one side and give subsidy to the other

  • When something is free to your side, you are subsidized

  • Subsidy on one side can lead to maximization of total profit

  • e.g. Microsoft (1990er): consumers paid and complementors get SDKs free

  • e.g. Facebook: users free, advertisers pay

    • Subsidy Pricing as a pricing decision within an asymmetric strategy

      • One side is intentionally priced below cost (or free) to stimulate network effects and maximize total platform profit

5
New cards

What two questions are important for subsidy choices?

  1. Which side to subsidize?

  2. How long to subsidize?

6
New cards

Explain why the Subsidy choices depends on the strength of Network Effects.

Which side to subsidize?

  • Subsidize the side that creates the largest positive cross-side network effect

  • Charge the side with the higher willingness to pay

  • Impacted by low marginal costs

  • Always consider the cross sided influence of the price

  • Goal: maximize the total platform profit, even if it means to lose money on one side → not profit on each side

How long to subsidize? → Depends on the Strenght of Network effects

  • If network effects remain strong, the subsidy may need to remain permanent

  • Removing the subsidy too quickly can cause users on the subsidized side to leave the platform

    • this reduces cross-sided network effects, decreases the platform´s value for the other side , can lead to the collapse of poth sides of the platform

      • e.g., making users pay for a previously free service could scare them away, in turn hurts ad revenue and reduces total profit

  • Transition to symmetric pricing needs to be carefully planned and is best implemented slowly

<p><strong>Which side to subsidize?</strong></p><ul><li><p>Subsidize the side that creates the <strong>largest positive cross-side network effect</strong></p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Charge the side with the <strong>higher willingness to pay</strong></p></li><li><p>Impacted by low marginal costs</p></li><li><p>Always consider the cross sided influence of the price</p></li><li><p><strong>Goal: </strong>maximize the <strong>total platform profit</strong>, even if it means to lose money on one side → <strong>not</strong> profit on each side</p></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>How long to subsidize? → Depends on the Strenght of Network effects</strong></p><ul><li><p>If network effects remain strong, the subsidy may need to remain permanent</p></li><li><p>Removing the subsidy too quickly can cause users on the subsidized side to leave the platform </p><ul><li><p>this reduces cross-sided network effects, decreases the platform´s value for the other side , can lead to the collapse of poth sides of the platform</p><ul><li><p>e.g., making users pay for a previously free service could scare them away, in turn hurts ad revenue and reduces total profit</p></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p>Transition to symmetric pricing needs to be carefully planned and is best implemented slowly</p></li></ul><p></p><p></p>
7
New cards

Explain the difference between Pricing Strategy and Monetization Pattern.

Pricing Strategie: Who pays?

  • Symmetric and Asymmetric Pricing (inkl. Subsidy)

  • e.g. Spotify: Consumers pay; Artists don´t (asymmetric)

→ setting prices

Monetization Pattern: How does the platform capture revenue / earn money?

  • 6 Strategies (Transaction fees, Pay for Tool…)

  • e.g. Spotify: Subscription, Advertising

→ revenue mechanism

8
New cards

Describe why network effects are robust.

  • Without network effects:

    • Two seperate markets with two prices

    • Independent most profitable price

  • With network effects:

    • Cross-sided effects

    • Price on one side changes demand on other side

    • Scalling the Network effects via mathematical specifications

<ul><li><p>Without network effects: </p><ul><li><p>Two seperate markets with two prices</p></li><li><p>Independent most profitable price</p></li></ul></li><li><p>With network effects: </p><ul><li><p>Cross-sided effects</p></li><li><p>Price on one side changes demand on other side</p></li><li><p>Scalling the Network effects via mathematical specifications </p></li></ul></li></ul><p></p>
9
New cards

Why is price more important in network markets?

In traditional markets: Price only influences the demand → Demand curve stays fixd

In Network markets: Price influences demand and value → Demand curve shifts

The entire demand curve can change with price

10
New cards

Why is price more strategic in two-sided networks? Why is two-sided network pricing important for the adoption?

In two-sided platforms, prices are used not only to maximize revenue from one side but also to drive adoption, stimulate cross-side network effects, and maximize total platform profit

11
New cards

Does free make sense?

Yes—if the free side generates value for the paying side

  • e.g. Google: Users are free but advertisers pay

  • e.g. Windows SDK: Developers free → More Windows applications → more Windows sales

→ free =/= no revenue

→ free = strategic subsidy

12
New cards

Explain what flows are in platforms.

  • Three key flows: Goods/Services, Money, Information

  • Ensure as many travel through platform as possible

  • Danger: you can´t monetize whatever travels off platform

    • e.g. On Uber the ride happens off-platform, but the money and data stay on-platform

    • On UpWork/Fivver, the service, $ and data happen on-platform but next exchange may happen off-platform

13
New cards

Name six monetization patterns for generating revenue.

  1. Transaction fees (Commission/Take rate)

  2. Access fees (Subscription/Membership)

  3. Revenue Sharing

  4. Advertising (Monitize attention and data)

  5. Ranking/Promotion fees (Match or Ranking Influencing (Advertisement))

  6. Pay for Tools (Saas/Enablement)

14
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of transaction fees.

  • Charge fee (eine Gebühr erheben) for facilitating transaction

  • Some charge users, some charge complementors, some charge both

  • most of the time a cut from a one-time payment tha is hidden from the user

  • Transaction between both sides goes through platform

  • Example: eventbrite, Uber, upwork, AppStore, airbnb, amazon

<ul><li><p>Charge fee (eine Gebühr erheben) for facilitating transaction</p></li><li><p>Some charge users, some charge complementors, some charge both</p></li><li><p>most of the time a cut from a one-time payment tha is hidden from the user </p></li><li><p>Transaction between both sides goes through platform</p></li><li><p>Example: eventbrite, Uber, upwork, AppStore, airbnb, amazon</p></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of access fees.

  • Pay for access to platform infrastrcture

  • Charge fee for facilitating lead generation

  • Usally the side is charged that needs the other more

  • Can be in many forms as in subscription or one-time payment

  • Example: DatingWebsites, Lead Generation, AppStore

  • e.g. Complementors and consumers pay for access to the platform and platform provides infrastructure for complementors and consumers

<ul><li><p>Pay for access to platform infrastrcture</p></li><li><p>Charge fee for facilitating lead generation</p></li><li><p>Usally the side is charged that needs the other more</p></li><li><p>Can be in many forms as in subscription or one-time payment</p></li><li><p>Example: DatingWebsites, Lead Generation, AppStore</p></li><li><p>e.g. Complementors and consumers pay for access to the platform and platform provides infrastructure for complementors and consumers</p></li></ul><p></p>
16
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of Revenue sharing.

  • Platform owners share the revenue with complementors

  • Customer pays, and the platform shares part of the revenue with complementors according to an agreed revenue-sharing model

  • Can be a fixed percentage or decided with a sliding scale

  • Example: Twitch

<ul><li><p>Platform owners share the revenue with complementors</p></li><li><p>Customer pays, and the platform shares part of the revenue with complementors according to an agreed revenue-sharing model</p></li><li><p>Can be a fixed percentage or decided with a sliding scale</p></li><li><p>Example: Twitch</p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of Advertising.

  • Monetizing through user attention and data

  • Company pays the platform to show their ad

  • Advertisers pay for access to users' attention, often based on impressions, clicks, or conversions

  • Do not clutter the transaction

  • Money goes to the platform but can also go to the complementors

  • Advertiser pays for advertisement to complementors and/or platform owner and than consumers attention is monetized

  • Example: Youtube, Instagram, X, TikTok

<ul><li><p>Monetizing through user attention and data</p></li><li><p>Company pays the platform to show their ad</p></li><li><p>Advertisers pay for access to users' attention, often based on impressions, clicks, or conversions</p></li><li><p>Do not clutter the transaction</p></li><li><p>Money goes to the platform but can also go to the complementors</p></li><li><p>Advertiser pays for advertisement to complementors and/or platform owner and than consumers attention is monetized</p></li><li><p>Example: Youtube, Instagram, X, TikTok</p></li></ul><p></p>
18
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of Ranking/Promotion fees (Match or Ranking Influencing (Advertisement)).

  • Charge for sponsored search or recommendations (is used to influence recommendations to be seen by more consumers)

  • Typically auctions

  • Do not clutter the transaction, keep network effects in mind

  • Complementors pay for better visibility within search results or recommendations

  • Can be paid by percentage cut or per promotion

  • Example: amazon, AppStore, Immo,Scout24, ebay

<ul><li><p>Charge for sponsored search or recommendations (is used to influence recommendations to be seen by more consumers)</p></li><li><p>Typically auctions</p></li><li><p>Do not clutter the transaction, keep network effects in mind</p></li><li><p>Complementors pay for better visibility within search results or recommendations</p></li><li><p>Can be paid by percentage cut or per promotion</p></li><li><p>Example: amazon, AppStore, Immo,Scout24, ebay</p></li></ul><p></p>
19
New cards

Explain the monetization pattern of Pay for tools.

  • Charge fee for better/upgraded tools → Users/Complementors pay for additional platform tools or capabilities

  • Basic versions often free to test/use

  • Can be in many forms as in subscription or one-time payment

  • Example: SAP, LinkedIn, X

<ul><li><p>Charge fee for better/upgraded tools → Users/Complementors pay for additional platform tools or capabilities</p></li><li><p>Basic versions often free to test/use</p></li><li><p>Can be in many forms as in subscription or one-time payment</p></li><li><p>Example: SAP, LinkedIn, X</p></li></ul><p></p>
20
New cards

Explain, using two platforms as examples, how differently they make their money.

Uber:

  • Pricing strategy: Asymmetric pricing

    • drivers and riders may be subsidized during growth

  • Monetization pattern: Transaction fees

    • Uber earns a comission from every completed ride

Instagram:

  • Pricing strategy: Assymetric pricing

    • Users acces the platform for free and advertisers pay for advertisements

  • monetization pattern: Advertising

    • dvertisers pay Instagram to reach users, so user attention and data are monetized

21
New cards

Why should a platform use subsidies?

  • To overcome the Chicken & Egg problem

  • attract users

  • strengthen cross-side network effects

  • increase platform adoption

  • and maximize total platform profit

  • e.g. Google: free Search to users → Millions of users attract advertisers → Advertisers pay Google ==> The subsidy (free search) creates much higher overall profit.