1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
return
measure of how well a security or a portfolio performs
stock holding period return
P0: begin. per. stock price
P1: end of per. stock price
D1: dividends paid (if any) right before the end of the period

income yield
dividends received by the investor (ex. interest earned from the bank)

capital gain or loss
change in security price

Fisher equation
to go from nominal returns to real returns (and vice versa)
inflation = growth rate in CPI

real return
return adjusted for inflation; shows true purchasing power
RR of cash is negative if i>0%
nominal return
return at face value before adjusting for inflation
NR of holding cash = 0% w/ no dividends

expected value
mean of a random variable
estimated using calculated sample mean based on past returns
stock return
viewed as a random variable b/c its realization is uncertain
variance
avg distance from the mean (units = sq. of original); measure of investment risk
standard deviation
average distance from the mean (units = same as original); measure of investment risk
sq. root of variance
interpret: the stock return typically deviates by __ % from the avg return of __ %
covariance
how 2 variables move together; measures direction; scale = infinite
positive # = move together
negative # = move opposite
correlation
how 2 variables move together; measures strength and direction; scale = -1 to 1
positive # = move together
negative # = move opposite
simple linear regression
best line that describes the relationship between 2 variables
error term: dist b/w point and regression line
errors minimized by ordinary least square

coefficient of determination (R2)
how much of the variation in Y is explained by X; scale = 0 to 1
alpha
the intercept of the regression; the value of Y when X is 0
t-stat
t-stat > 1.96 means the coefficient is statistically significant (aka different from 0)
for alpha or beta
beta
the slope of the regression; on avg, when X increases by 1%, Y increases by (beta)%
returns across various assets
treasury bills: ST loan to gov; low risk, low returns
bonds (gov and corp): LT, receive periodic CPNS then principal is paid back at maturity; mid risk, mid returns
Stocks: ownerships to corporations that are entitled to receive cash dividends; high risk, high returns

security returns based on firm characteristics
size (market cap)
small firm = higher TOT risk, higher returns (not higher market risk/beta)
industry affiliation
accounting ratios (BTM)
value firms have higher returns and risk than growth firms
How security returns behave compared with their risk
Relation between average returns and dispersion (risk) is not trivial (simple/linear)
benefits of diversification
even naive diversification reduces risk considerably (ex. picking stocks randomly)
downward trend, but the relationship is not monotone (adding a stock does not strictly decrease volatility every single time)
utility function
used to rank and choose among different investment alternatives
same utility = no preference b/w risky or RF asset
risk aversion
The higher the A, the more the investor dislikes risk
A>0: risk averse (prefers RF if RP=0); paying for insurance
A=0: risk neutral
A<0: risk-loving (prefers risky if RP=0)
A doesn’t matter if sd=0 (constant returns)
determines which securities an investor selects
risk premium
E(R)-Rf; expected excess return
indifference curve
all the combos of risk and expected return that give an investor the same amount of utility
one for each level of utility (infinite possibilities)
indifference curve breakdown
risk averse = steep curve (requires massive return for extra risk)
risk loving = flatter curve (required minimal return for extra risk)
higher intercept = higher utility (closer to NW area = highest return, least risk))
risk neutral investor
only cares about expected return and completely ignores risk/volatility (A = 0, U=E(R))
indifferent between investments
investor derives the same utility from both investments
every point along indifference curve
portfolio
combo of securities indicating the amount invested in each one to balance risk and return
3 rules of portfolio algebra
To characterize the risk and return of ANY portfolio
E(R) of a portfolio is the weighted avg of the E(R) of the securities in the portfolio
sum of the weights of each security in a portfolio is ALWAYS 1
Variance formula for 2 assets
covariance = 0 if 1 risky and 1 RF (constant return)
capital allocation line
shows all the risk and return combos from a portfolio of 1 risky and 1 RF asset
slope = sharpe ratio of risky asset
every portfolio on the same CAL = same Sharpe ratio
buying on margin
borrowing money from a broker to buy stocks
investor benefits if stock price increases
short selling
Selling something you don’t own
Investor benefits if stock price decreases
short selling example
borrow a security from a broker and sell it, then buy it back later and return the security
CAL for buying on margin (borrowing)
TOT risk surpasses stock risk

CAL for short selling
only short if Rf > E(R) b/c all earned proceeds are the Rf

sharpe ratio
how much excess return an investor receives for taking on extra risk; measures risk-adjusted return
slope of the CAL
interpret: asset earns (SR)% of excess return above the Rf for every 1% of risk
optimal portfolio
proportion you should invest in the risky asset; tangent of the indifference curve and CAL;
Xs decreases when A or sd increases
Xs increases when E(R) increases
Formula derived from maximizing utility, subbing E(Rp) and sd(Rp) values
minimum variance frontier
set of RISKY portfolios with the lowest variance for each level of return
minimum variance frontier for correlation=1
highest risk b/c if one does poorly, so does the other (no buffer)
like holding one stock
small gains from diversification
investment opportunties set will curve slightly left

minumum variance frontier for correlation=-1
lowest risk b/c 2 risky assets move in opposite directions (performance cancels)
high gains from diversification (lower risk for same level of E(R))
investment opportunties set will curve sharply left (NW area)

perfectly hedged portfolio
portfolio of risky assets with zero risk; when correlation=-1
minimum variance frontier for correlation=0

efficient frontier
the set of portfolios that have the highest possible expected return for a given level of risk.

minimum variance portfolio
the portfolio of RISKY assets which has the lowest standard deviation

diversification
combining risky securities into a portfolio in order to reduce total portfolio risk
eliminates firm-specific risk, but not market risk (beta)
Two-Fund Separation Theorem
All portfolios on the Minimum Variance Frontier can be found by combining ANY two distinct portfolios that are also on that frontier
Useful when constructing a minimum variance frontier with N assets to avoid multivariate optimization and vector algebra
If portfolios Y and Z lie on the Minimum Variance Frontier, any new portfolio P constructed from them is also on the frontier

systematic and non-systematic risk
because the average covariance between the securities in the NYS is positive, we should not expect to completely eliminate market risk in a large diversified portfolio
systematic/market risk - interest rate changes, recessions, geopolitical conflicts
non-systematic/ firm-specific - mismanagement, product failures, labor strikes

optimal risky portfolio (many risky securities and 1 RF asset)
tangency point of the CAL and the efficient frontier; maximum sharpe ratio (slope)
weight invested is determined by the investor’s risk aversion
mean variance efficient portfolio (MVEP)
the portfolio of risky assets that has the HIGHEST SHARPE RATIO
maximizes the reward per unit of risk

optimal CAL
CAL with the maximum sharpe ratio (slope)
any portfolio on this line is an efficient portfolio
obtained by combining the risk-free rate with the MVEP
slope is the sharpe ratio of the MVEP

optimal global portfolio
agents will combine the risk-free asset with the MVEP in different proportions
everyone chooses the MVEP, but high risk averse investors will invest more on the RF asset and low-risk-averse investors will invest more on the MVEP (and possibly borrow at the risk-free rate)