1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Actus reus
an act must be voluntary and volitional
Mens rea
the mental state required by statute for criminal culpability
Purposeful
defendant has a goal of engaging in certain conduct
Knowing
the defendant is aware of the nature of their conduct and that a harmful result is practically certain to occur
Reckless
the defendant is conscious that their behavior creates an unjustifiable risk and acts anyway
Negligent
the defendant did not perceive the risk at the time, but should have known that their behavior created an unjustifiable risk
general intent
crimes require only that you had the requisite intent to commit the actus reus
specific intent
crimes require that you had an intention to bring about the resulting harm
Solicitation
asking someone to commit a crime on your behalf
only the solicitor needs to possess mens rea
merges into the completed crime
Conspiracy
2+ people need to possess mens rea
at least one party must take one overt action
does not merge
Attempt
requires proof that the defendant actively desired or planned to bring about that exact criminal result
substantial step test (model penal code) vs proximity test (common law)
Substantial Step Test (Model Penal Code)
the act must strongly corroborate the person’s criminal intent
buying materials
scouting a location
Proximity Test (Common Law)
the action must come dangerously close to completing the crime
merely planning or preparing is not enough