1/65
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
why did McCulloch sue
Congress chartered bank in Maryland, Maryland fined them $15K
Maryland’s argument of why the establishment of the bank was unconstitutional
it says nowhere in the Constitution that Congress can do that
McCulloch’s argument for why the bank was constitutional
necessary and proper clause
decision in mcculoch v maryland
in favor of mcculloch, constitutional because of the necessary and proper clause
why mcculloch v maryland matters
set precedent for federal v state laws
why us v lopez went to SCOTUS
Lopez brought a gun to school, he was arrested for violating texas law, state charges were dropped because he was violating the gun-free school zones act
us v lopez constitutional principle
commerce clause
what did lopez argue
federal government can’t establish gun-free zones act because thats a power reserved to the states
what did the us argue
guns → gun violence → people less likely to travel through → affects commerce
why did the court side with lopez
if Supreme court can use commerce clause to justify that, then what can’t they justify?
why did baker v carr end up before scotus?
tennessee hadn’t redrawn districts in over 60 years, and urban population had expanded a lot
scotus hadn’t ruled on redistricting because they decided that redistricting was not [blank]
justiciable
which constitutional princple was baker v carr about
14th amendment equal protection clause
what was the argument against tennessee
by refusing to redraw districts, not all citizens were equally represented
why is baker v carr important
established one person one vote doctrine, and many states had to redraw their districts, and scotus now was involved with political questions
why did shaw v reno end up in scotus
none of nc’s representatives were black, so they tried to draw majority black districts, but district 12 was drawn weirdly
which constitutional stake was at stake in shaw v reno
14th amendment equal protection clause
what was shaw’s argument
his rights were violated because the districts were drawn only with race in mind
reno’s argument
It was drawn with the intention of helping black minority residents
what did the court rule in shaw v reno
ruled in favor of shaw
why did the court rule that way
districts drawn only based on race sets a dangerous precedent
first two parties of the us
federalists and democratic-republicans
why did marbury v madison end up before scotus
adams just lost the election to jefferson, so adams signed commissions for justices, but some were not delivered including Marbury’s, so he sued Madison to get his commission by a writ of mandamus
what is a writ of mandamus
court order for an official to do what they’re legally required to do
judiciary act of 1789
supreme courts could issue a writ of mandamus during original jurisiction
constitutional principle in Marbury v Madison
jurisdiction (original or appellate) in article 3
3 questions asked in marbury v madison
does marbury have legal right to comission?
is the writ of mandamus the right way to get the commission?
does the court have the authority to grant the writ of mandamus?
what were the answers to those questions
yes, yes, no
why did justice marshall answer no to the last question
marbury is a judge, and madison is a cabinet secretary which is not an ambassador or state official, so article 13 is unconstitutional
why is marbury v madison important
gave judicial branch power of judicial review
why did engel v vitale end up before scotus
NY had a prayer that was to be recited by schools, but kids could opt out with a permission slip, but engel still sued
constitutional principle at stake in engel v vitale
establishment clause of first amendment
what did the scotus decide
the prayer did violate the first amendment
why is engel v vitale important
established precedent for cases regarding schools and religious activities
why did wisconsin v yoder end up before scotus
3 Amish families removed their kids from public schools after 8th grade due to religion, and they were fined $5 due to Wisconsin law that said that kids had to be in school until they were 16
constitutional principle at stake in wisconsin v yoder
first amendment free exercise clause
yoder’s argument
wisconsin’s law violated their right to freely exercise their religion
wisconsin’s argument
states had a compelling interest in educating the children of the state which trumped the right to free exercise
what did the court rule
in favor of yoder
why did tinker v des moines end up before scotus
tinker’s family decided to support the christmas truce by wearing black armbands, and they got suspended
constituional principle at stake in tinker v des moines
first amendment free speech
what the the scotus rule
Violation of the student’s right to free speech
what did the court establish in tinker v des moines
substantial disruption test - how schools could limit student’s free speech
how did scenck v us end up before scotus
schenck tried to convince men to resist the new military draft to WWII, and was arrested for violating the espionage ac
constitutional principle at stake in schenck v us
first amendment right to free speech
what did the court rule
schenck’s rights were not violated because he was actively encouraging men to avoid the drat
what did schenck v US establish
clear and present danger test
why did nyt v us end up before scotus
us was involved in the undeclared vietnam war, and americans were unhappy so nixon told the americans that everything was going well when in reality it wasn’t which was leaked to nyt who published a paper about it. nixon tried to enact prior restraint on nyt
constitutional principle at stake
first amendment right to freedom of press
what did nixon argue
by publishing the papers it was a threat to national security
what did scotus decide
agreed with NYT
how did mcdonald v chicago end up before scotus
gun ownership was allowed federally but not state wise. mcdonald wanted a hand gun for self protection but was unable to buy one due to chicago laws
constitutional principle at stake
second amendment
chicago’s argument
laws were necessary to uphold public safety
what did the court rule
court ruled in favor of mcdonald
how did gideon v wainwright end up before scotus
gideon was arrested for robbing and sent to trial, but was poor and unable to have a lawyer due to florida laws and so lost his case
constitutional principle at stake
sixth amendment case
quesiton in gideon v wainwright
does the EPC of the 14th amendment let the sixth amendment be applied to the states
what did scotus rule
in favor of gideon
how did brown v board of education end up in scotus
plessy v ferguson est separate but equal, and a black family tried to get their white girl into a white school but was denied admission
constitutional principle at stake
14th amendment equal protection clause
who did the court agree with
brown
how did citizens united v fec end up before scotus
bcra made it illegal to do ads 60 days before the election, but in 2008 hillary the movie was to be released after that time frame
constitutional principle at stake
first amendment free speech
what did scotus decide
in favor of citizens united
question scotus considered during citizens united v fec
since money = speech, is it fair that those with the most money have the loudest voices?