1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Justine Buck Quijada
MA and PhD in anthropology
Currently associate professor, Dept. of Religion, Wesleyan U.
Interests include post-Soviet religious practice in Buryatia, indigenous urban shamanism, and New Age neo-shamanism
Buryatia and the Buryats
Buryatia controlled by Russia/USSR since 18th c AD
By Mongolia before that
Buryats speak a Mongolic language; many cultural similarities to other Mongolian groups
Traditional religious practice includes both Buddhism and shamanism
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov
Born 1852, died (according to most opinions) 1927
Buddhist religious leader
Died in 1927 in lotus position
Exhumed 1955, 1973 and 2002
Corpse has been presented as a ‘scientific miracle’
Soft tissues are not desiccated
Preservation might be explained by soil/coffin of original burial and filling of coffin with salt after initial exhumations
Motives for visiting Etigelov include faith, healing, curiosity
Etigelov is also seen as ‘one of us’
In contrast, some express distaste, discomfort or fear of his corpse
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Buddhist religious leader
Joined monastery at age 15
Became 12th Pandito Khambo Lama of Eastern Siberia in 1911
Identified as reincarnation of first lama of his line – but officially he was elected
Reputation as a virtuous leader – many good acts for WWI soldiers, others
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Died in 1927 in lotus position
Or, some faithful argue, went into an extremely deep trance
Buried seated, in pine box
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Exhumed 1955, 1973 and 2002
Each time, body asserted to be miraculously preserved
Not reburied after 2002 – kept for display and veneration
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Corpse has been presented as a ‘scientific miracle’
From a standpoint of faith, it remains undecayed because of his extreme spiritual purity, or even because he’s not truly dead
From a standpoint of science many claim preservation is ‘inexplicable’
Thus bridges two ways of seeing the world in this society
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Soft tissues are not desiccated
Not natural mummification in the strict sense
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Preservation might be explained by soil/coffin of original burial and filling of coffin with salt after initial exhumations
Anaerobic conditions have created spectacular soft tissue preservation in some other well-known burials
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Motives for visiting Etigelov include faith, healing, curiosity
A way to heal complaints including ‘heaviness of the soul’ outside the state-approved medical system
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: Etigelov is also seen as ‘one of us’
A zemliak (countryman) of modern Buryats, healing, comforting and protecting his people
The corpse of Dashi-Dorzho Etigelov: In contrast, some express distaste, discomfort or fear of his corpse
Not clearly dead or alive – an unusual and troubling uncertainty
Even if he’s accepted as dead, his body seems to be in a persistent liminal state
Unlike a ‘dry’ mummy or ashes, Etigelov’s remains seem to be stuck in the ‘wet’ initial stage without actually decaying. To some people this may feel uncanny or ‘wrong’.
The corpse of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
Quijada contrasts Etigelov with Lenin, another iconic corpse on display in Russia
People she interviewed tended to reject the comparison but the parallels are very interesting
Lived 1870-1924, leader of Soviet Russia 1917-1924
Body preserved after death in 1924 and placed in mausoleum beneath Kremlin walls in Red Square
Displayed/venerated since then (brief pause during WWII when corpse was moved for its safety)
The science of Lenin’s corpse: For the first few days after death the body was preserved by extremely cold weather and short-term embalming
Removal of brain & viscera for autopsy
Draining of blood (replaced with embalming fluid)
Several large veins and arteries severed during this work, which was originally intended to be temporary
The science of Lenin’s corpse: Longer-term work has focused for decades on creating the appearance of a recently deceased corpse
Maintaining color, flexibility, facial & body contours
This has required extensive addition to and replacement of original tissues
Has included injection of flexible materials to replace subcutaneous tissue, replacement of eyelashes, regular immersion in fixative fluids
Lenin as a scientific/secular saint
Quijada draws a comparison between bodies of Lenin and Etigelov
Both are ‘miraculously’ preserved but for Lenin this was an intentional miracle of Soviet science
Thus Lenin’s corpse was used to symbolize nation’s future and a new identity for Soviet humanity
Lenin as a symbol of the state/history
After the collapse of USSR some argued Lenin should be buried
After much debate this was rejected
Lenin seen as a crucial part of history
Thus the corpse has entered a new phase of postmortem life
Symbol of Russian history, greatness and pride, not ‘Soviet greatness’
The corpse of Abraham Lincoln
Assassinated Washington DC April 1865, shortly after Civil War (1861-1865), by Confederate sympathizer
Embalmed for state funeral followed by three week transportation to place of burial (Springfield IL) with frequent stops for public viewing, mourning and funeral orations
Viewed by massive crowds
Early in this process, accounts stressed impression of corpse as peaceful, lifelike
Lincoln, nationhood and US deathways: Lincoln’s preserved corpse carried a number of messages
Mass gatherings to view it can be seen as a way to assert fragile national unity
Portrayal of Lincoln as ‘sleeping martyr’ and the willingness of so many people to wait to view his corpse both can be seen as underscoring the moral rightness of Union victory
Lincoln, nationhood and US deathways: Some argue this helped popularize embalming in the late 19th c USA
Yes, but important to recognize that embalming was popularized during Civil War
Fairly effective methods developed in mid-19th c but many were reluctant to use them because of strictures against disturbing/defiling the ‘pure’ corpse
Embalming used by upper class Union families as a way to return dead soldiers for family to say farewell to and (for some) for public mourn as martyrs
The corpse of Eva Perón
Eva Duarte Perón became first lady of Argentina in 1946 when Juan Perón was elected president
Her origins in poverty helped make her a public face of Peronism
Died in 1952 of cervical cancer (age 33) Embalmed with intention of permanent display, state funeral held
Stored pending completion of mausoleum
Transported out of country in 1957, buried in Italy under assumed name
Exhumed 1971, returned to Juan Perón
Final internment in Duarte family tomb 1975
The history of Perón’s corpse can be understood as a reflection of the messages it could carry
The corpse of Eva Perón: Her origins in poverty helped make her a public face of Peronism
Movement relied heavily on the support of poor and working classes
Eva Perón was popular with these groups – vocal supporter of the rights of the poor and of women
The corpse of Eva Perón: Embalmed with intention of permanent display, state funeral held
Massive attendance by public
The corpse of Eva Perón: Stored pending completion of mausoleum
The body ‘vanished’ from storage in 1955 after Juan Perón was ousted and exiled – possibly to protect it?
The corpse of Eva Perón: Exhumed 1971, returned to Juan Perón
Perón regained power in 1973
Eva’s corpse brought to Argentina, restored and displayed again
The corpse of Eva Perón: The history of Perón’s corpse can be understood as a reflection of the messages it could carry
Initially embalmed & displayed as symbol of the Perón regime’s legitimacy
Movements after 1955 reflect both use as a political symbol and a desire to protect/respect her body through burial
The power of iconic corpses
These corpses function simultaneously as the remains of an individual and the embodiment of larger ideas
Conduits for messages about faith, self-sacrifice, national identity
Public may experience grief, veneration, curiosity, anxiety
Power interests preserving, displaying or hiding the corpses have strategic agendas but may also experience these emotions
Iconic corpses and Verdery’s ideas: This is a great illustration of some of Verdery’s ideas on the political lives of dead bodies:
They fascinate because of their humanity and because they remind us of our mortality (think of attraction to / fear of Etigelov)
Part of their power as a medium for communication comes from their personal history (e.g. Lincoln as symbol of his united nation)
They no longer speak, but convey the messages selected for them (e.g. Lenin’s modern role as a symbol of Russian greatness)
They can carry multiple meanings (e.g. Eva Perón as symbol of her husband’s regime, but also as a woman deserving burial/rest)