1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
shareholder theory
Managers have a duty to maximize SH value, maximize profitability
cases to know for shareholder theory
Dodge v. Ford Motor (1919)
Shlensky v. Wrigley (1968)
who is known for shareholder theory
Milton Friedman
Dodge v. Ford
dodge is complaint, Ford is not giving out dividends as he wants to reinvest $ to increase production, lower cost of cars, dodge won the case. embraces short term vision of SH theory
shlensky vs. wrigley
install lights for night games to increase attendance, but wrigley didn't want to disturb neighborhood. wrigley has more of a vision for daytime baseball. wrigley wins, more of a long term view of SH theory
stakeholder theory
Rebuke to the shareholder primacy theory, other parties(stakeholders) need to be considered for any corporate action
who is known for stakeholder theory
freeman
ethical business decision
utilitarianism + deontological (kant) + rights + justice (rawls)
utilitarianism
The right action or policy is one that produces the greatest good for the greatest number. it is ends based thinking and consequentialist
who is known for utilitarianism
bentham and mill
Deontological
Rule based: The morality of an action is judged based on the action's adherence to rules or principles. No matter how good the consequences, some choices are morally forbidden. Kant's categorical imperative
kants categorical imperative
universibility and reversibility, to determine the principle is something that you want to adhere to, you would be comfortable with it being a universal standard of behavior
deontology and who created it
kant
rights theory
Rights-based approach to ethical decisions (which option best respects the rights of the stakeholders?) Prioritizes basic over non-basic rights
who is known for rights theory
werhane
justice theory
Many different theories of justice, but most theories revolve around the idea that stakeholders must be treated fairly, distribute benefits and burdens fairly
who is known for justice theory
rawls and distrubutive justice (protecting the most vulnerable stakeholder)
gaia hypothesis
earh is a living creature
virtue theory
Any action is morally right if in carrying out the action the agent exhibits amorally virtuous character• Character-based (as opposed to action-based) approach to morality• Are you exhibiting the character of person you want to be when carrying out the decision?
virtue theory step 1
Identify the pool of virtues you/your company wants to cultivate:
- Look to philosophers on the core virtues of humanity; or
- Company's mission statement; or
- Class community election
virtue theory step 2
define the virtues
virtue theory step 3
which virtues are relevant to the situation?
virtue theory step 4
apply the relevant virtues (need to decide how to prioritize virtues)
behavioral ethics
Examining the situational, psychological, and social forces that influence decision-making. Increase awareness of the disconnect between our actual behavior and our reflective morals
behavioral economics
people will do what is in their economic best interest, hence a market economy
normative
how you should act (philosophy)
descriptive
how people actually act (behavioral/psych)
confirmation bias
tendency to seek, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms one's existing beliefs. How we frame a question can be a function of confirmation bias
conformity bias
People tend to behave like those around them instead of exercising independent judgment (herd mentality), see ansch and milgram
how to counteract conformity bias
neutral questions, devils advocate
fundamental attribution error
Tendency people have to overemphasize personal characteristics and ignore situational factors in judging others' behavior
ansch
line test
milgram
electric shock test
informational confirmtion/conformity
where subject actually believes they were wrong
normative conformity
go along with the group to avoid uncomfortibility
implicit bias and in group favoritism
more likely to favor beliefs/values of your group and vice versa with outgroup
why we conform
1. compliance driver
2. identification
3. internalization
4. ingratiation
1. compliance driver (why we conform)
want to gain benefits/rewards
2. identification (why we conform)
view oneself as wanting to be part of a group and reflect traits of those groups
3. internalization (why we conform)
you actually believe what the group believes is the truth (ex. vegetarianism)
4. ingratiation (why we conform)
you want someone to view you in a favorable way
incrementalism
enron and college admission scandals (slippery slope), see varsity blues
overconfidence bias
unconsiously lowering your ethical standards over time because you can get away with it
rationalizations
denial of responsibility, denial or injury, denial of the victim, condemning the condemners, appeal to higher loyalty, metaphor of the ledger, claim of entitlement, claim of relative acceptability/normality
denial of responsibility
"i didn't do anything wrong, it was an accident"/ "it was an emergency, i needed it"
denial of injury
"nobody got hurt"/ "I didn't steal, I just borrowed"
denial of the victim
"I'm the real victim here"/ "they got what they deserved"
condemning the condemners
"this place is unfair or corrupt"/ "the rules are unjust anyway"
appeal to higher loyalty
"I did it for the company"/"I had to put my family first"
metaphor of the ledger
"ie done way more good than bad in my life"/ "for all i've done for this place, this is nothing
claim of entitlement
"I deserve this"/ "i've earned the right to have this"
claim of relative acceptability/normality
"there are people way worse than me" or "everybody does it"
Hosmer step 1
Identify the moral problem
Hosmer step 2
Identify additional unknown facts helpful to making a decision
Hosmer step 3
Identify the alternatives available to apply to the problem
Hosmer step 4
Identify the personal impacts to the decision-maker (not stakeholder, but personal) & Behavioral Ethics
Tombstone Test
How do you want to be remembered?
Newspaper Test
How would it sound with a reporter summarizing your actions
Hosmer step 5
apply 3 leading contemporary theories of business ethics (ex. shareholder, stakeholder, virtue)
Hosmer step 6
Conclude with a decision