Molesworth Pastoral History: Land Use, Environmental Impact, and Management Changes

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

When were Molesworth, Tarndale and St Helens taken up as pastoral runs?

From the 1850s onward.

2
New cards

How many sheep did the three Molesworth runs once carry?

Around 95,000 sheep.

3
New cards

What did the 95,000 sheep show about the old perception of the high country?

Success was measured by maximising pastoral production, with little concern for environmental limits.

4
New cards

What environmental pressures damaged Molesworth?

Intensive sheep grazing, tussock burning, rabbits and the harsh climate.

5
New cards

What happened to the land because of overgrazing and rabbits?

Vegetation was stripped, causing soil erosion and severe land degradation.

6
New cards

What happened in 1938 at Molesworth?

Tarndale and Molesworth were amalgamated because the land had become badly degraded.

7
New cards

What happened in 1949?

St Helens was added, and private runholders had effectively abandoned the failed farming system.

8
New cards

What major management change happened from the 1950s?

Sheep were removed and replaced with cattle, which grazed less intensively.

9
New cards

What other recovery methods were introduced from the 1950s?

Rabbit control, aerial oversowing, fencing and careful stock management.

10
New cards

How many cattle could the recovering station carry by 1968?

About 9,000 cattle.

11
New cards

What happened in 1982?

A formal stocking cap of 10,000 head was introduced.

12
New cards

Why is the 1982 stocking cap important?

It shows that production was deliberately limited to protect the environment.

13
New cards

What happened to Molesworth in 2005?

Management passed to the Department of Conservation.

14
New cards

What did the 2005 change show about perceptions?

Molesworth was increasingly valued for conservation, recreation and public access, not just farming.

15
New cards

How much have cattle numbers been reduced in recent decades?

By around 40%.

16
New cards

Why is the 40% reduction important?

It shows environmental protection can be prioritised even when it reduces short-term farm income.

17
New cards

What happened in 2026?

Operation of Molesworth passed to Ngāi Tahu Farming.

18
New cards

What values were considered in the 2026 management decision?

Biodiversity, conservation, public access and farming performance.

19
New cards

What is the overall perception change at Molesworth?

From "land to be tamed" for maximum production to "land to be balanced" through stewardship, farming and conservation.

20
New cards

What is the strongest Molesworth cause-and-effect chain to remember?

Maximum production → overgrazing and vegetation loss → erosion and degradation → farming failure → changed management → environmental recovery → conservation and stewardship.