AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases and Fondational Documents

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:52 PM on 10/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

25 Terms

1
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Judicial Review</strong>. The Court declared a congressional law unconstitutional, establishing the judiciary as an equal branch of government with the power to check other branches.</span></p>

Focuses on Judicial Review. The Court declared a congressional law unconstitutional, establishing the judiciary as an equal branch of government with the power to check other branches.

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

2
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Federalism and the Elastic Clause</strong>. Ruled that Congress has the implied power to create a national bank, and states cannot tax federal institutions because federal law is supreme.</span></p>

Focuses on Federalism and the Elastic Clause. Ruled that Congress has the implied power to create a national bank, and states cannot tax federal institutions because federal law is supreme.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

3
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Federal Overreach &amp; The Commerce Clause</strong>. Ruled that possessing a gun in a school zone is a non-economic activity, marking the first time in decades that the Court limited Congress's power under the commerce clause.</span></p>

Focuses on Federal Overreach & The Commerce Clause. Ruled that possessing a gun in a school zone is a non-economic activity, marking the first time in decades that the Court limited Congress's power under the commerce clause.

United States v. Lopez (1995)

4
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause</strong>. Ruled that legislative mal apportionment challenges can be reviewed by federal courts, creating the <strong>“one person, one vote” </strong>standard for equal district populations.</span></p>

Focuses on the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Ruled that legislative mal apportionment challenges can be reviewed by federal courts, creating the “one person, one vote” standard for equal district populations.

Baker v. Carr (1962)

5
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Racial Gerrymandering</strong>. Ruled that although states can consider race to comply with the Voting Rights Act, they cannot make race the predominant factor when drawing bizarrely shaped district lines.</span></p>

Focuses on Racial Gerrymandering. Ruled that although states can consider race to comply with the Voting Rights Act, they cannot make race the predominant factor when drawing bizarrely shaped district lines.

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

6
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>First Amendment Free Speech</strong>. Ruled that political spending by corporations and unions is protected speech, allowing for unlimited independent political expenditures and giving rise to Super PACs.</span></p>

Focuses on First Amendment Free Speech. Ruled that political spending by corporations and unions is protected speech, allowing for unlimited independent political expenditures and giving rise to Super PACs.

Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

7
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Establishment Clause</strong>. Ruled that school-sponsored, non-denominational prayer in public schools is unconstitutional because the government must remain neutral in matters of religion.</span></p>

Focuses on the Establishment Clause. Ruled that school-sponsored, non-denominational prayer in public schools is unconstitutional because the government must remain neutral in matters of religion.

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

8
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Free Exercise Clause</strong>. Ruled that a state's interest in compulsory high school education is outweighed by a community's right to freely practice its deeply rooted religious beliefs.</span></p>

Focuses on the Free Exercise Clause. Ruled that a state's interest in compulsory high school education is outweighed by a community's right to freely practice its deeply rooted religious beliefs.

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

9
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Wartime Speech Restrctions</strong>. Established the <strong>“clear and present danger” </strong>test, ruling that speech can be limited if it poses a direct threat to national security or public safety.</span></p><p></p>

Focuses on Wartime Speech Restrctions. Established the “clear and present danger” test, ruling that speech can be limited if it poses a direct threat to national security or public safety.


Schenck v. United States (1919)

10
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Symbolic Speech</strong>. Ruled that students do not lose their free speech rights at the schoolhouse gate; silent protests (like wearing armbands) are protected if they do not substantially disrupt school operations.</span></p>

Focuses on Symbolic Speech. Ruled that students do not lose their free speech rights at the schoolhouse gate; silent protests (like wearing armbands) are protected if they do not substantially disrupt school operations.

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

11
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Freedom of the Press</strong></span>. <span style="font-size: medium;">Struck down the government's attempt at <strong>prior restraint </strong>(censorship before publication), ruling that the government failed to prove publishing the classified papers threatened national security.</span></p>

Focuses on the Freedom of the Press. Struck down the government's attempt at prior restraint (censorship before publication), ruling that the government failed to prove publishing the classified papers threatened national security.

New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)

12
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Second Amendment &amp; Incorporation</strong>. Ruled that the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense applies to state and local governments through the <strong>14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause</strong>.</span></p>

Focuses on the Second Amendment & Incorporation. Ruled that the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense applies to state and local governments through the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

13
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Equal Protection Clause</strong>. Overturned <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em>, ruling that state-sanctioned racial segregation in public schools is inherently unequal and unconstitutional.</span></p>

Focuses on the Equal Protection Clause. Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson, ruling that state-sanctioned racial segregation in public schools is inherently unequal and unconstitutional.

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

14
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on the <strong>Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel</strong>. Ruled that state courts must provide a free lawyer to any criminal defendant who cannot afford one, incorporating this right via the <strong>14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.</strong></span></p>

Focuses on the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel. Ruled that state courts must provide a free lawyer to any criminal defendant who cannot afford one, incorporating this right via the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

15
New cards
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Focuses on <strong>Same-Sex Marriage</strong>. Ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples under both the <strong>Due Process Clause </strong>and the <strong>Equal Protection Clause</strong>.</span></p>

Focuses on Same-Sex Marriage. Ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples under both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause.

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

16
New cards

Outlines natural rights and the social contract to explain why the colonies are breaking away from a tyrannical king.

The Declaration of Independence

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The Declaration of Independence</span></p>
17
New cards

The first U.S. government framework that failed completely because the central government was too weak to tax or raise an army.



The Articles of Confederation

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The Articles of Confederation</span></p>
18
New cards

Written by James Madison; argues that a large republic is the best way to keep powerful political factions (interest groups) from taking over.

Federalist No. 10

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Federalist No. 10</span></p>
19
New cards

Written by James Madison; argues that separation of powers and checks and balances are necessary to keep the government from becoming tyrannical.



Federalist No. 51

20
New cards

Written by Anti-Federalists; argues that a large central government will use the Elastic Clause to destroy state powers and trample individual liberties.



Brutus No. 1

21
New cards

The first 10 amendments added to the Constitution to explicitly protect individual freedoms from federal government overreach.

The Bill of Rights

22
New cards

Written by Martin Luther King Jr.; argues that citizens have a moral duty to use nonviolent direct action to fight unjust, segregationist laws.

Letter from Birmingham Jail

23
New cards

Written by Alexander Hamilton; argues for a single, energetic executive (one President) who can make decisions with speed, secrecy, and accountability.

Federalist No. 70

24
New cards

Written by Alexander Hamilton; argues that the judiciary needs lifetime tenure to maintain its independence and exercise judicial review.

Federalist No. 78

25
New cards

Establishes our current supreme law and three-branch government framework built on compromises and federalism (shared power with states).

The Constitution of the United States